Absurdities of a wave model for light

11 views
Skip to first unread message

sorin

unread,
May 25, 2009, 5:35:16 PM5/25/09
to Fundamentos de Física
Absurdities of a wave model for light
A new text is presented at:
http://www.elkadot.com/corpuscular/Absurdities%20of%20a%20wave%20model%20for%20light.htm
The present text analyses the actual wave model of photon at frequency
greater then 3 ×108 Hz, corresponding to light speed. Few principal
problems are raised:
Why the electric field generated at these frequencies at different
moments does not interfere and produce interference fringes?
Does a quantum electron jump between two atomic orbits produce an
oscillating electromagnetic field?
Can someone trust in classical mechanism of electromagnetic wave
generation at these frequencies? Does an inertial electron oscillate
with these superluminal frequencies?
Any ,,common sense’’ intelligence and only one synapse in a common
theoretical mind will admit that actual wave model of photon need to
be changed at least for frequencies greater then light speed.
The next discussion will be about electronic polarization at
frequencies greater or close to 3×108 Hz, or how charges are forced to
move at these frequencies.

From the multitude of messages received, I will try to comment one of
must lucid answer made by Vince Morgan for a previous link:
http://www.elkadot.com/magneticity/Electric%20current%20cut%20off%20experiments.htm
The Vince text:
I've been watching this post, anticipating some lively debate. Should
I be
surprised that no one has responded, I don't think so.
Seems that some prefer the warm fuzziness of knowing that they, and or
their
peers, already know what there is to know. It's so personaly
comforting
that they aren't likely to give it up in a hurry.
It's posts like these, especialy where the experiment is so very
easily
replicated, that seem to attract the least responces.
Many who've been challenged by the above online material will tomorrow
claim
that they've seen nothing.
Science has more in common with religion today than most realize. …..

My comment:
I have sent for about 15 years a lot of texts for publishing to all
relevant physics journals with a impact factor greater then 1. All,
without exception, had denied publishing my papers.
I have sent messages to quite all world physics and chemistries
academies. All of them ignored the texts.
I have sent texts to all well known organizations working in the field
of physics or chemistry: NASA, ESA, great universities from all around
world, or personal to professors at these universities. No answer.
I still support the comments of some non physicists working in the
field of physics, when I try to make advertising to a new theory of
physics.
If I hade made these and I support all these is because the proposed
theory is becoming an affair. The time when I would be happy if one
journal publishes one of my papers is gone. Now I’m not interested to
publish in all these recognized journals. Their incompetence and the
incompetence of all (non) physicists working in the key position in
actual structures help me to gain monopole of a new theory covering
physics and chemistry. With every day which passes the monopole
enlarges…


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages