Schuberth Sc2 Manual Pdf Download |TOP|
Phuong Vath
In order to pair your unit with a non-Cardo headset please do the following:
1. Start intercom pairing on your unit (please refer to your pocket guide or user manual on how to do it)
2. On the other unit start mobile phone pairing
3. Wait For the pairing to complete
1.Pair the first rider to your unit on channel A.
2.Pair the second rider to your unit on channel B.
3.Ask the first or the second rider to pair the fourth member of the group on their free channel.
Consult the Pocket guide or the user manual For more details.
1.Pair the first rider to your unit on channel A.
2.Pair the second rider to your unit on channel B.
3.Ask the first or the second rider to pair the fourth member of the group on their free channel.
Consult the Pocket guide Or the user manual For more details.
The SCHUBERTH SC2 is a communication system designed for motorcycle helmets. It offers various features including Mesh Intercom, Bluetooth Intercom, Music playback, and device settings. The SC2 comes with a remote control for convenient operation. The device can be upgraded and configured using the SCHUBERTH Device Manager software.App functions: Mesh Intercom, Bluetooth Intercom, Music, Device settings, Language settingsSCHUBERTH DEVICE MANAGERThe SCHUBERTH Device Manager allows you to upgrade the firmware and configure its settings directly from your PC. Download the SCHUBERTH Device Manager from oem.sena.com/schuberth/.
Recently it was proposed by Schuberth et al., (GJI, 2012) that the difference in the magnitude of P and S delay times from the large low shear velocity provinces (LLSVP) can be explained by differences in their frequency content. They produced synthetic seismograms using the spectral element method (SEM) and measured travel times using an automated cross correlation technique through a synthetic 3D Earth model based solely on temperature variations. They found a similar difference in the magnitude of P and S travel time variations for their isochemical model as the real Earth and suggest that it is the nature of the cross correlation analysis that results in different P and S wave delay times, not the Earth's material properties. Their preferred explanation is two-fold: 1) that the P waves are front loaded with higher frequencies and 2) that for the same frequency, P waves have a larger Fréchet kernel and thus different wavefront healing characteristics than S waves for the same structure. Here, I demonstrate that the observed long period P waves are no more front loaded in frequency than S waves when cluster analysis is applied. I compare the travel times of P and S waves for events sweeping across the Pacific lower mantle recorded at the numerous USArray stations. I apply the cluster analysis method (Houser et al., GJI, 2008) and a manual cross correlation method (Bolton and Masters, JGR, 2001) method to the long-period (25s) as well as shorter period (15s) observed and synthetic seismograms. If the notion of Schuberth et al. were correct, then the observed P-wave pulse would be compressed at the onset, e.g. front loaded in frequency, and then spread out toward the back end. In this case, a cross correlation made based on the first swing of the pulse would result in a different travel time than a cross correlation based on the highest amplitude swing in the middle of the P wave. However, I find that for both P and S waves, the highest quality waveforms are matched peak-for-peak by normal mode synthetics. This indicates that there is no front loading of the P waves compared to the S waves and that their relative travel time differences are not strongly influenced by finite frequency effects. Thus, the high dlnVs/dlnVp ratio in the Pacific LLSVP is not a finite frequency feature, but a material property. While the results of Schuberth et al. for their synthetic Earth still stand, they cannot be reconciled with observations of the real Earth by detectable differences in the P and S wave frequency content.
df19127ead