Error:005, 3 jobs

647 views
Skip to first unread message

Miquel Gallardo Penas

unread,
Apr 2, 2024, 5:07:53 AM4/2/24
to FUMA GWAS users
Good morning, I have uploaded some jobs to FUMA and it has returned error 005 stating that it has not found any significant SNPs (threshold e-8), however there are significant SNPs in the job data and I don't know what is really happening. I'm leaving the IDs here in case you can take a look.
ID: 468798, ID: 468802, ID: 468803. 
Thank you very much.

fuma.ctglab

unread,
Apr 2, 2024, 9:18:10 AM4/2/24
to FUMA GWAS users
Dear Miquel, 

ID: 468798
In this job, 1 SNP has p value < 5e-8: 
chr     bp      non_effect_allele       effect_allele   rsID    p       beta    se      N
5       141841444       G       T       rs2974701       2.38926e-08     -28.2941        5.06957 234

However, the position of this SNP seems to be incorrect. 
In our database,  rs2974701 is associated with chr5 position 141221009.
Please double check. 

ID: 468802
In this job, 1 SNP has p value < 5e-8: 
chr     bp      non_effect_allele       effect_allele   rsID    p       beta    se      N
7       3943268 C       T       rs73038416      3.55169e-08     -0.663862       0.120444        251

However, the position of this SNP seems to be incorrect. 
In our database,  rs73038416 is associated with chr7 position 3982900. 
Please double check. 

ID: 468803
In this job, 1 SNP has p value < 5e-8: 
chr     bp      non_effect_allele       effect_allele   rsID    p       beta    se      N
7       155923947       C       G       rs7789601       3.53774e-08     0.703946        0.1277  234

However, the position of this SNP seems to be incorrect. 
In our database,  rs7789601is associated with chr7 position 155716641. 
Please double check. 

Please double-check to make sure that your coordinates are in hg19. 

Thank you,
FUMA

wenhui liu

unread,
Dec 20, 2025, 9:56:28 AM (13 days ago) 12/20/25
to FUMA GWAS users
Good afternoon. I have uploaded some work to fua, and it returned error 005, indicating that it did not find any important SNPS (threshold e-8), but there were important SNPS in the work data. I tried to relax the threshold and lower the MAF, but it was still the same. I left my ID  here. You can have a look.


Id: 690424, Id: 690422, Id: 468803.

Thank you very much.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages