A website of interest
Nigel Lane
Has free stuff like an A to Z list for christian teens, talky bit
outlines and more.
The opportunity to find individualised answers to the issues you may
face or opportunities you may want to explore to the full.
Why not go for a snoop?
Nigel Lane
www.TeenCoach.org
Helping young people find clear direction for their life
knickfan
"Nigel Lane" <Head...@REMOVETHIS.TeenCoach.org> wrote in message
news:d3e7ku87gs90c4lfb...@4ax.com...
Nigel Lane
wrote:
>sounds nice.. now if it only worked... :P
IF ??
Sam R
Nigel Lane <Head...@REMOVETHIS.TeenCoach.org> wrote in message
news:d3e7ku87gs90c4lfb...@4ax.com...
> www.TeenCoach
>
> outlines and more.
>
> The opportunity to find individualised answers to the issues you may
> face or opportunities you may want to explore to the full.
>
> Why not go for a snoop?
Because that would be encouraging spam. Please do not spam
alt.religion.christian-teen, we don't appreciate it and the only visits your
site will get from us is to laugh at it's poor design or look for security
weaknesses.
knickfan
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 22:24:49 GMT, "knickfan" <knic...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >sounds nice.. now if it only worked... :P
>
> IF ??
>
ahh, it wasn't working when you first posted it :)
Nigel Lane
I think we must have a different definition of spam. To me spam is
unsolicited email, the original newsgroup post was offering
information that is of interest to people that would read stuff here -
specifically an a to z of christian teens; youth talks, and the like.
You, or others reading here, would not create spam by visiting the
site. I don't think the original psot was spam.
Nigel Lane
www.TeenCoach.org
For young people who want to be their absolute best
Sam R
The purpose of your post was to solicit visits to the site mentioned in the
first line of the post.
Whether you think it is relevant to the five newsgroups you posted it to is
irrelevant.
It was not part of any discussion, and as these are discussion groups it
served no purpose but to advertise your site - thus it is spam.
wersh
<Head...@REMOVETHIS.TeenCoach.org> wrote:
>On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:07:59 +0100, "Sam R" <co...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Nigel Lane <Head...@REMOVETHIS.TeenCoach.org> wrote in message
>>news:d3e7ku87gs90c4lfb...@4ax.com...
>>> Why not go for a snoop?
>>
>>Because that would be encouraging spam. Please do not spam
>>alt.religion.christian-teen, we don't appreciate it and the only visits your
>>site will get from us is to laugh at it's poor design or look for security
>>weaknesses.
>>
>I think we must have a different definition of spam. To me spam is
>unsolicited email,
Spam is commonly defined as unsolicited advertisement. You were
advertising a website. Your advertisement was not solicited; further,
the FAQ/charter of at least one of the newsgroups requests that such
messages not be made to that group.
Did you read the FAQs and/or charters for all the groups before posting
to them? If not, you really should have. *shrug*
--
@suzi=map{$_=~/[SUZI]/?1:0}split//,'SUzISUzisUzisUZISuzISuziSuZiSUZiS'.
'UzISUziSuZISuZiSUzISUziSuzisuZIsUZisUzISuzISuZisuZIsuZisuzIsuzi';while
(@suzi){$suzi+=2**$Suzi++*pop@suzi;unless($Suzi%4){print((split//,'Ju'.
'stknocha Perl')[$suzi]);$suzi=$Suzi=0;}}# Z...@wersh.com http://wersh.com