Commit 2600
23 views
Skip to first unread message
Waldek Hebisch
Aug 28, 2019, 8:57:25 PM8/28/19
to fricas...@googlegroups.com, leh...@math.tugraz.at
Dear Franz,
You have:
+ subordinationConvolution : (%, %) -> %
+ ++ \spad{subordinationConvolution(x, y)} returns the orthogonal convoluti
on
+ ++ of the distributions \spad{x} and \spad{y}
In docstring there is "orthogonal convolution", is this correct?
--
Waldek Hebisch
You have:
+ subordinationConvolution : (%, %) -> %
+ ++ \spad{subordinationConvolution(x, y)} returns the orthogonal convoluti
on
+ ++ of the distributions \spad{x} and \spad{y}
In docstring there is "orthogonal convolution", is this correct?
--
Waldek Hebisch
Franz Lehner
Aug 29, 2019, 4:19:55 AM8/29/19
to fricas...@googlegroups.com
Dear Waldek,
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> + subordinationConvolution : (%, %) -> %
> + ++ \spad{subordinationConvolution(x, y)} returns the orthogonal convoluti
> on
> + ++ of the distributions \spad{x} and \spad{y}
>
> In docstring there is "orthogonal convolution", is this correct?
no, typical error by copy and paste. It returns the subordination
convolution as its name says. Corrected.
best,
Franz
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> + subordinationConvolution : (%, %) -> %
> + ++ \spad{subordinationConvolution(x, y)} returns the orthogonal convoluti
> on
> + ++ of the distributions \spad{x} and \spad{y}
>
> In docstring there is "orthogonal convolution", is this correct?
convolution as its name says. Corrected.
best,
Franz
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages