Scientifically rigorous computation: was "You don't need delegation, but it's very useful"

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Carl Hewitt

unread,
Jul 29, 2021, 11:12:03 AMJul 29
to fr...@googlegroups.com, Alan Karp

Thanks Christine!

 

We need a rigorous scientific understanding of computation that is free of dogma.

 

As in other branches of science, that means mathematical foundations.

 

Such foundations can help address critical practical challenges such as the following:

 

   Currently, a Great Power cyberattack campaign can take down a country’s economy and

    keep it down for a long time [“Sandworm”  Greenberg 2019] .  Unless there is drastic change, it is expected that

    there is a particular country that will be so attacked within the next 7 years in the context of a larger crisis.

 

To prevent successful cyberattacks, an Apollo-scale project is required to develop and deploy

current scientific understanding.

 

See the following video for more information:

 

    “Preventing Successful Cyberattacks Using Strongly-typed Actors”

             https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJP1VL7shiI

 

Regards,

Carl

https://professorhewitt.blogspot.com/

 

-----Original Message-----
From: fr...@googlegroups.com <fr...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Christine Lemmer-Webber
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 19:22
To: fr...@googlegroups.com
Cc: Alan Karp <alan...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [friam] You don't need delegation, but it's very useful

 

Alan Karp writes:

 

> (Previously sent to cap-talk, but I haven't gotten any responses.)

> 

> from a comment made on a standards email list.

> 

> 

> That's not what I think.  I suppose you could avoid needing

> attenuation by having a separate capability for each possible

> permission (or worse, combination of permissions), but I don't know

> how to do responsibility tracking without it.

 

In a sense, since you cannot prevent delegation, maybe you don't need it, in that you'll always have it.  ;)

 

One doesn't need memory reclamation either, but it is very useful :)

 

- Christine

 

PS: I think the earliest implementations of lisp machines, maybe pre-CADR even, actually didn't have first-class memory reclamation support either (hardware based GC came later), but also had it anyway... what people would do is write out the entire running "world" to disk and come back later and boot it again, as a kind of hardcore stop-and-copy.  I think I read this in the lisp history writeup or something... I like the story, so I hope I didn't get it wrong.

 

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages