So are we giving up on Fresh?
1 view
Skip to first unread message
James Beirne
Feb 14, 2010, 1:10:05 PM2/14/10
to fresh...@googlegroups.com
--
James Beirne
Kenner Gordon
Feb 14, 2010, 3:39:48 PM2/14/10
to fresh...@googlegroups.com
Yes.
--
I don't really get the point of signatures.
--
I don't really get the point of signatures.
Kenner Gordon
Feb 14, 2010, 3:42:22 PM2/14/10
to fresh...@googlegroups.com
Wait, no, sorry, mistyped.
James Beirne
Feb 14, 2010, 6:23:34 PM2/14/10
to fresh...@googlegroups.com
On 14/02/2010 4:42 PM, Kenner Gordon wrote:
> Wait, no, sorry, mistyped.
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Kenner Gordon <kenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:10 AM, James Beirne <james.m...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> James Beirne
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> I don't really get the point of signatures.
>>
>
>
>
Jajajaja> Wait, no, sorry, mistyped.
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Kenner Gordon <kenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:10 AM, James Beirne <james.m...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> James Beirne
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> I don't really get the point of signatures.
>>
>
>
>
--
James Beirne
James Beirne
Feb 14, 2010, 6:23:59 PM2/14/10
to fresh...@googlegroups.com
Hahahaha.
--
James Beirne
James Beirne
Feb 14, 2010, 6:43:04 PM2/14/10
to fresh...@googlegroups.com
On 14/02/2010 4:42 PM, Kenner Gordon wrote:
> Wait, no, sorry, mistyped.
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Kenner Gordon <kenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:10 AM, James Beirne <james.m...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> James Beirne
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> I don't really get the point of signatures.
>>
>
>
>
So what do you suggest we do about this mess, then?>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Kenner Gordon <kenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:10 AM, James Beirne <james.m...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> James Beirne
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> I don't really get the point of signatures.
>>
>
>
>
--
James Beirne
Kenner Gordon
Feb 15, 2010, 10:34:46 AM2/15/10
to fresh...@googlegroups.com
What mess? Fresh is just going throw a death spurt. It happens every time someone gets a dictatorship. Yally's lasted longer, you know; we just need to wait until either A) someone finds a way to remove your dictatorship or B)
Kenner Gordon
Feb 15, 2010, 10:35:14 AM2/15/10
to fresh...@googlegroups.com
Ugh. Anyway, or B) something happens that makes people want to play again.
James Beirne
Feb 15, 2010, 3:18:34 PM2/15/10
to fresh...@googlegroups.com
On 15/02/2010 11:34 AM, Kenner Gordon wrote:
> What mess? Fresh is just going throw a death spurt. It happens every time
> someone gets a dictatorship. Yally's lasted longer, you know; we just need
> to wait until either A) someone finds a way to remove your dictatorship or
> B)
> What mess? Fresh is just going throw a death spurt. It happens every time
> someone gets a dictatorship. Yally's lasted longer, you know; we just need
> to wait until either A) someone finds a way to remove your dictatorship or
> B)
Whatever you say. Just don't expect much.
--
James Beirne
Aaron Goldfein
Mar 6, 2010, 6:21:11 PM3/6/10
to Fresh Nomic
I pretty much stopped playing when James insisted that he took
dictatorship and refused to accept anyone saying otherwise, thereby
pretty much ruining the game for everyone. I'm sure with enough work I
could have intervened and fixed everything, but I didn't, and since I
still feel that James's dictator thing failed, we're all no longer
players by the player removing rule and have no way to become players.
Therefore, we'll need to start a new game if we want to continue
playing.
dictatorship and refused to accept anyone saying otherwise, thereby
pretty much ruining the game for everyone. I'm sure with enough work I
could have intervened and fixed everything, but I didn't, and since I
still feel that James's dictator thing failed, we're all no longer
players by the player removing rule and have no way to become players.
Therefore, we'll need to start a new game if we want to continue
playing.
Aaron Goldfein
Mar 6, 2010, 6:27:48 PM3/6/10
to Fresh Nomic
I have an idea. What if we make the rules to this new game such that
the goal is to gain a dictatorship. We can all occupy various distinct
roles with distinct powers, and the winner of the game is the person
who adds a rule that says "Player X is in charge." When that happens,
that player creates a new game, assigns everyone roles in that game,
and we repeat.
the goal is to gain a dictatorship. We can all occupy various distinct
roles with distinct powers, and the winner of the game is the person
who adds a rule that says "Player X is in charge." When that happens,
that player creates a new game, assigns everyone roles in that game,
and we repeat.
Kenner Gordon
Mar 7, 2010, 2:06:13 PM3/7/10
to fresh...@googlegroups.com
Also, I like your idea for the new game, if no-one agrees with spirit-over-spirit; it's quite similar to the rounds of yore.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Kenner Gordon <kenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey, Aaron... when we switched from the BlogNomic ruleset to the Suber one, did you change it with a proposal or your dictatorship? (Oh, please let it be the latter; if it was the latter, then I have a plan. Operation Artisan will soon be set in motion.)
--I don't really get the point of signatures.
Kenner Gordon
Mar 7, 2010, 1:50:42 PM3/7/10
to fresh...@googlegroups.com
Hey, Aaron... when we switched from the BlogNomic ruleset to the Suber one, did you change it with a proposal or your dictatorship? (Oh, please let it be the latter; if it was the latter, then I have a plan. Operation Artisan will soon be set in motion.)
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Aaron Goldfein <aarong...@gmail.com> wrote:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages