Hi,
I would think you express the consumption of ingots in fractional numbers.
Eg a demand for 1 of foil X requires 0.5 ingots, a demand for 1 of foil Y requires 0.05 ingots, etc…
This will give you a good enough view on the purchasing of ingots.
This approach is an approximation. How&which foils can be produced together from a single ingot is not considered in detail.
If you need that level of detail, it’s perfectly possible to create operations that produce multiple items.
You fill the operation-material table as shown below.
We often use such approach to model “by-products” or “scrap material”. When the output is flexible and changes in function of the demand this approach won’t be valid. The approximated approach described first is then the best & simplest approach.
operation | item | quantity | type |
make foils X and Y | ingot | -1 | start |
make foils X and Y | X | 3 | end |
make foils X and Y | Y | 5 | end |
Stay safe,
Johan De Taeye
Mob: +32 477.385.362
Skype: jdetaeye
Visit us at https://frepple.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "frePPLe users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to frepple-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/frepple-users/8cd4129a-d76f-4a44-8994-3171566b0516n%40googlegroups.com.