Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

As chat groups go...

29 views
Skip to first unread message

PJ The Womble

unread,
Jun 19, 2003, 10:21:27 AM6/19/03
to
We're not being all that chatty at the moment, are we?


deviant

unread,
Jun 19, 2003, 10:29:22 AM6/19/03
to

"PJ The Womble" <spam....@all.thanks.gov.nr> wrote in message
news:bcsgt0$4fb$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...

> We're not being all that chatty at the moment, are we?
>
>

not in a chatty mood really. sure it will pass.


Inspector Frost

unread,
Jun 19, 2003, 10:56:39 AM6/19/03
to

"PJ The Womble" <spam....@all.thanks.gov.nr> wrote in message
news:bcsgt0$4fb$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
> We're not being all that chatty at the moment, are we?
>
Go onn then shon talke tooo me I'm listeenenning.>


PJ The Womble

unread,
Jun 19, 2003, 4:03:52 PM6/19/03
to
In news:bcsiv8$jn1$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk,
Inspector Frost <insp...@frostymail.com> typed:

Byyyy thisshhh time of might, sorry, night , you
may be listening but I'm not all that interesssssssssssttttttttttiiiiiiiing.

So I'm going to listen to a nice old Bobby Bland album and a bit of The Ruts
for the minute.

Just before I go, though, an ex-pal of mine who I've known since I was 14
has just brought up a few things I lent him over the years, because I asked
him to in a nice but very compelling way a short while ago.....

He didn't bring up the nice stainless steel flask that I lent him last year.
BUT.... I now have in my hand as I speak an original pressing of "All Mod
Cons" by The Jam, which apparently I lent him in 1981 and he'd forgotten all
about. And 3 good novels, and The Best of The Stranglers on vinyl.

Every cloud.....


Maria

unread,
Jun 19, 2003, 4:50:56 PM6/19/03
to
well i could chat about chatting.

"PJ The Womble" <spam....@all.thanks.gov.nr> wrote in message
news:bcsgt0$4fb$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...

deviant

unread,
Jun 19, 2003, 5:22:58 PM6/19/03
to

"Maria" <ma...@mallon8649.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bct7nh$p78$1...@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk...

> well i could chat about chatting.


and those lovely scams offering unlimited income


PJ The Womble

unread,
Jun 19, 2003, 5:35:14 PM6/19/03
to
In news:bct7nh$p78$1...@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk,
Maria <ma...@mallon8649.fsnet.co.uk> typed:

Like, look in the dictionary under "recursion", dudette. If you find it
says "see Recursion" then get back to me.


deviant

unread,
Jun 19, 2003, 7:29:28 PM6/19/03
to

> Like, look in the dictionary under "recursion", dudette. If you find it
> says "see Recursion" then get back to me.

ahh recursion... my favorite part of computing...... oh no i've gone
crosseyed


PJ The Womble

unread,
Jun 19, 2003, 8:37:43 PM6/19/03
to
In news:bcth0u$4qd$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk,
deviant <xxx...@xxx.xx> typed:

I've yet to work out the Towers of Hanoi problem, and they shot that one at
me 11 years ago!

If anyone's got a good formal method for that. I would not only be happy,
I'd be bloody grateful to see it. I'm still trying to do the thing on the
solitaire prog, before I start playing it, instead of steaming in and
clicking!.

Two things about this:

Asking the woman you're dating about the last woman you went out with is
guaranteed to provide an undefined result. Which knacks the recursive
function at stage n-1!

Woody Allen backs up the idea that everything you can do recursively, you
can do iteratively as well: "I have learned from my mistakes to the point
that I can now repeat them exactly".

deviant

unread,
Jun 20, 2003, 7:09:39 AM6/20/03
to

> If anyone's got a good formal method for that. I would not only be happy,
> I'd be bloody grateful to see it. I'm still trying to do the thing on the
> solitaire prog, before I start playing it, instead of steaming in and
> clicking!.
>

i used to have a pascal program listing for the towers of hanoi, and a
mathematical formula defining the number of turns it would take to finish
the game, but god knows where it is now


PJ The Womble

unread,
Jun 20, 2003, 10:27:26 AM6/20/03
to
In news:bcuq1q$q7m$1...@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk,
deviant <xxx...@xxx.xx> typed:

I remember that listing in the first-year textbook at uni, but it was
uncommented and I couldn't make head or tail of it. It was included, I
think, as an example of a problem that could only be solved recursively, and
not iteratively - to illustrate the point that anything you can do
iteratively, you can do recursively, but not vice versa.

I'm really pleased I remembered that, actually. I was quite stoned during
that first year of college! Wish I could remember Nicola Waterson's phone
number too. Still, I digress.

Hanoi? No wonder the Americans bombed Vietnam, that's all I've got to say!


kkiranr...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 4, 2013, 5:13:15 AM12/4/13
to
On Thursday, June 19, 2003 7:51:57 PM UTC+5:30, PJ The Womble wrote:
> We're not being all that chatty at the moment, are we?

wait a minute
?????????????

thenewch...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 6, 2014, 4:51:42 PM2/6/14
to
On Thursday, June 19, 2003 3:21:57 PM UTC+1, PJ The Womble wrote:
> We're not being all that chatty at the moment, are we?

come join us at www.chatstreet.webeden.co.uk we offer free rooms to organisations.
0 new messages