Segfault with freemedforms 0.9.4 on Fedora 21

[Ankur Sinha]

Hi Eric,

I just updated the Fedora package to 0.9.4. I was testing it out before
I push the update but I seem to be getting a segmentation fault when I
login after the initial user creation. Please find the trace attached:

> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> g_type_check_instance_cast (type_instance=0xce20b0, iface_type=11801200) at gtype.c:4013
> 4013 node = lookup_type_node_I (type_instance->g_class->g_type);
>

This is on gnome3 on Fedora 21. I haven't tried another DE yet. It is always reproducible. Freediams works just fine.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

[Ankur Sinha]

On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 01:50 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> This is on gnome3 on Fedora 21. I haven't tried another DE yet. It is
> always reproducible. Freediams works just fine.

ABRT also filed a bug for me. It'll probably have more information than
the trace I attached:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142358

It looks like something to do with the webcam plugin.

[Eric Maeker]

May be try without the webcam plugin : edit buildspecs/optionalplugins.pri

Éric

> <freemedforms.log>

[Eric Maeker]

Ah and just remove all CONFIG+=with-* there are uneeded as the
buildspecs/optionalplugins.pri contains now all information about
extra-plugins to build.

Thanks
Eric

--
Eric Maeker
GPG: 0xB9520933

[Ankur Sinha]

Hi Eric,

On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 18:01 +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
> May be try without the webcam plugin : edit
> buildspecs/optionalplugins.pri

It doesn't crash when I disable the webcam plugin.

[Ankur Sinha]

On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 10:22 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> It doesn't crash when I disable the webcam plugin.

Eric,

Should I push a package without the webcam plugin as an update or would
you prefer that we fix the bug and then I push the complete package? The
webcam plugin is quite a convenient feature to have :)

[Eric Maeker]

Le 17/09/2014 02:30, Ankur Sinha a écrit :
> On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 10:22 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> It doesn't crash when I disable the webcam plugin.
>
> Eric,
>
> Should I push a package without the webcam plugin as an update or would
> you prefer that we fix the bug and then I push the complete package? The
> webcam plugin is quite a convenient feature to have :)

Please, can you push without the webcam plugin. Webcam plugin requires
some debugging and is provided as source only for devs.

Thanks a lot Ankur

[Ankur Sinha]

On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 09:02 +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
> Please, can you push without the webcam plugin. Webcam plugin requires
> some debugging and is provided as source only for devs.

Sure. I'll do that.

I was wondering: should I split each plugin into a different subpackage?
That way users can install whatever plugins they want? Will this work?

[Eric Maeker]

Le 17/09/2014 02:30, Ankur Sinha a écrit :

> On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 10:22 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> It doesn't crash when I disable the webcam plugin.
>
> Eric,
>
> Should I push a package without the webcam plugin as an update or would
> you prefer that we fix the bug and then I push the complete package? The
> webcam plugin is quite a convenient feature to have :)

I'd like to keep everything about the project sync with the debian
package. Currently, all plugins are released inside one unique package,
but I plan to create a specific package for webcam as it depends on
opencv libs (may be with 1.0.0).

Thanks

[Ankur Sinha]

On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 13:25 +0200, Eric Maeker wrote:
> I'd like to keep everything about the project sync with the debian
> package. Currently, all plugins are released inside one unique
> package,
> but I plan to create a specific package for webcam as it depends on
> opencv libs (may be with 1.0.0).

OK. Great. I'll push the update now.
--
Thanks for your help, Eric,