makes you think doesn't it...
quite easy for him to go about life (is he still inside BTW?)
when he (gets/got) out, and not be recognised.
He's out, he only served something ridiculous like 3 months. I think he
lives in Brazil now he used to live there alot before he was arrested. But
yeah it makes you think.
--
ぐ`壶挨Hedwigぐ`壶挨
hedw...@NOSPAMhotmail.com
Dawn is nature's way of telling you to go to bed.
I suppose it is worth taking note of but it scares me.
--
Tersefer
Take for instance people who get off on seeing things on bangedup.com such
as heads exploded, or dead people with infections etc etc etc etc Now I
think that's pretty fucked up myself. A lot of that is us being humand and
being curious creatures as we are, willing to poke our fingers in the wounds
etc.
But it's equivalent to standing over the dead body of someone and gawping,
maybe even laughing at the severity and ridiculous nature of some poor
unforunate souls death.
If these images are so "sick" to the core, how come 15 years 11 months and
29 days can be illegal and a few hours later it's legal. If we're making
younger and younger people more attractive then the consequences are that
there's no harm in finding something so young sexually attractive. Depending
on wether Mr Glitter was looking at these images from a curiousity point of
view ("What the hell would that look like?") based on image descriptions, or
wether he actuall would've been capable of any act upon a child.
Are the image producers exploiting the children as well as their audience?
Or is it a cowardly audience who want the image producers to exploit the
children to satisfy their needs?
You may yourself have slightly questionable images on your drive :) Don't
take it to friggin' Tiny Computer for a service :D
"挨Hedwigぐ" <Hed...@hedwig7.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:aa3hg0$b21$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...
--
ぐ`壶挨Hedwigぐ`壶挨
hedw...@NOSPAMhotmail.com
Dawn is nature's way of telling you to go to bed.
"M_HOULLIER" <m_houllier @ blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:%Pcx8.5516$Cp4.3...@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
Didn't he used to shag Denise Van outen?
"挨Hedwigぐ" <Hed...@hedwig7.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:aa3tlt$r3v$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk...
16? That's still illegal!!! If I found out that some shit had managed to
find naked pictures of my (16 and 17 yo) female friends, I would be
extremely pissed off! I admit that girls are lookign older younger and
younger these days, but that's WHY the age is 18, because by that time girls
are mature enough to make their own decisions. His crime was a horrendous
one. Hed said 4000 images on his laptop? WTF? Evil sick bastard.
"M_HOULLIER" <m_houllier @ blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:%Pcx8.5516$Cp4.3...@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
>Yes I'm back :P
>
>16? That's still illegal!!! If I found out that some shit had managed to
>find naked pictures of my (16 and 17 yo) female friends, I would be
>extremely pissed off! I admit that girls are lookign older younger and
>younger these days, but that's WHY the age is 18, because by that time girls
>are mature enough to make their own decisions. His crime was a horrendous
>one. Hed said 4000 images on his laptop? WTF? Evil sick bastard.
AFAIK the age of consent is still 16, Baul. But, yes, you're right,
Gary Glitter's collection of downloaded kiddie porn and printed
material featuring children as young as 2 was horrendous, and only a
sicko would attempt to defend him.
--
~yidaho~
"There are only 10 types of people in the world - Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
Theresa
>In N.I the age of consent is 17 for girls and 16 for boys - and paedophilic
>pornography is revolting, there is no defence. Many of us will remember
>M_Houllier from last year, he just likes to be controversial
Indeed, Tess, to both statements.
--
Boffy
"Baul" <boff...@bowsher.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Caix8.7554$xn.3...@news8-gui.server.ntli.net...
>If these images are so "sick" to the core, how come 15 years 11 months and
>29 days can be illegal and a few hours later it's legal.
He had pictures of 2 year old girls being abused.
Defend that...
Yo Gran, BTW
--
Boffy
"Granulated" <An...@Nicotinepatch.co.uk> wrote in message
news:78qeaukstse6lstc6...@4ax.com...
Far more dangerous ar re the pedo's whose faces you wont recognise
than any you do.
--
Vanessa
Some people have a way with words, while others... erm... thingy.
>Yo Gran, BTW
Yo Boff.. AFAIK
--
Boffy
"vjc" <v...@sistersofstreisand.com> wrote in message
news:44gbcukc04dm3idel...@4ax.com...
>Yes I'm back :P
You were "gone" ?
All child pornography literally makes my stomach turn, and as for the
thought of those two year old children being involved - heart wrenching.
I was once unfortunate enough to open a post on an ng with similar
atrocities, I just could not comprehend it, and it took several seconds
for the image to actually hit home. The smiling face of the little girl
on the picture was the first thing that I homed on to, and then I saw
the rest . Her smile still haunts me, and just the thought of that smile
alone, is the only reason I need to brand it all as sick.
If I had it my way, I'd castrate not only the people who are producing
it, but the parents who allow their children to me misused in this
fashion.
As for the pedophiles themselves, they really do need help, and in The
Netherlands they get it.
Gary Glitter got off very, very lightly indeed.
I'm not sure it this is the right forum for this discussion, but I just
had to say it.
Ah, yes... you're prolly right, Boffy.
--
~yidaho~
"I love my dust. It shows I had something better to do." -- Anonymous
You'd think he was Ronnie Kray sometimes :)
But seriously though, I've thought that any crime where the crime is to look
at something is quite weird.
2 years old is sick, in that case probably banging someone up aint gonna do
any good - they're still gonna be the kind of person who likes that kinda
thing at the end of the day, need to be some sort of rehab there for sure?
All the rehab he's had is to serve 3 months and then buggar off abroad
living a happy life.
Didn't Catherine of Russia used to like horses? (not sure if she DID them of
course, although it's bullshit that that's how she died).
But hey, the world's a big place, Gary Glitter looking at dodgy pictures
aint the biggest fish in the pond now is it.
Oh and, Morning all :)
Just thought I'd pop in.
Tess - I didn't leave you aggreived didst thou?
- MH
"tim(bo) ;-)" <shaw...@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
news:3CC5C5B6...@wanadoo.nl...
--
Boffy
"Granulated" <An...@Nicotinepatch.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2kseaug7aj3amepgi...@4ax.com...
> Tess - I didn't leave you aggreived didst thou?
>
> - MH
Nah, but you can't deny you're a stirrer! Half the time I don't think you
even agree with what you're saying, you just like an argument lol. and
before another English picks up on it, shouldn't it be didst I? ;-)
Tess
>"Tess" <theresa...@ntlworld.com> wrote this, suspiciously:
>
>>
>>"M_HOULLIER" <m_houllier @ blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:7Ojx8.1413$dh5.1...@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>>> Tess - I didn't leave you aggreived didst thou?
>>>
>>> - MH
>>Nah, but you can't deny you're a stirrer! Half the time I don't think you
>>even agree with what you're saying, you just like an argument lol. and
>>before another English picks up on it, shouldn't it be didst I? ;-)
>>
>>Tess
>
>or dickest i?
snnnnn!!
They now begin to realise that I don't take NO for an answer!
:-P
However, we shouldst not be arguing amongst ourselves, we need to unite
against the common enemy!
THE JUDEAN PEOPLE'S FRONT?
(either them or Rupert Murdoch!)
(hugs and kisses and flowers in Tess' direction)
Doesn't everyone deserve a second chance? :-)
- MH
"Tess" <theresa...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:_4kx8.14873$A43.3...@news11-gui.server.ntli.net...
Aww, thanks for the kisses and flowers, I am starved of affection here!!
I hate to admit this but.........
I have a Greatest Hits of Gary Glitter and the Glitterband on CD.
Shocking stuff. I think I'll emigrate to Brazil too.
M_HOULLIER wrote:
--
TimBo :-)
"ooe err, zei de actries tegen de bischop, dat is een grote klokkenspel!"
You got that right and so many are 'respectable' people you would
never suspect.
--
Tersefer
snnn
--
Tersefer
Helloooooo! :p Welcome back :)
It's 16 for topless only and 18 for full nudity, etc.
--
Paul
remove the medication from email address to reply
-- -- --
Boffy <boff...@bowsher.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:XFix8.14369$A43.3...@news11-gui.server.ntli.net...
Dorty booger...................
Welcome back!
V
"Paul" <dp.v192m...@ntlworld.com> wrote this, suspiciously:
>I know the answer to that..surprisingly. :-D
>
>It's 16 for topless only and 18 for full nudity, etc.
--
What, me?? <:-)
> Welcome back!
Cheers. :-) I'll be in and out (easy!) of here, post when I can (be
bothered that is). Got a ton of college work on at the moment, nearly the
end of the first year, so I ain't had the time to post a thing.
I have, however, found the time/put back an assignment to go out on the town
tonight. yay! :-)
--
Paul
remove the medication from email address to reply
-- -- --
vjc <v...@sistersofstreisand.com> wrote in message
news:pceecugrc8c9kibr1...@4ax.com...