BRAND NEW NOKIA HANDSETS £20
brian HOLMES
ROM. Already received a nokia 6600 waited 10 weeks EXCELLENT any one else
want on e go here. www.mobiles4all.com PLEASE quote my Referral ID =
70000250 and help get my handset quicker THANK YOU!
steveb
trapdoor, peered around and wrote:
>X-Complaints-To: ab...@theplanet.net
Reported for touting yet another illegal pyramid scheme.
Freeserve TOS forbids criminal use of accounts
malcolm
"steveb" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:il0v20la5vf6fr3ss...@4ax.com...
But making libellous comments and using profanity is perfectly okay is it?
Let he who hath commited no sin cast the first stone.
Chris Peacock
"malcolm" <nospamc...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:2gSXb.6499$cb7....@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net...
steveb
and wrote:
>But making libellous comments and using profanity is perfectly okay is it?
>Let he who hath commited no sin cast the first stone.
/me chucks stone at Malcolm, who has behaved like a total arse before :P
What libelous statement? Matrix schemes have been describe by the Office of
Fair Trading as pyramid schemes and unlawful. Which bit of that do you
stuggle with?
Why are you supporting a spammer and a criminal to score points off me?
What a dipstick you are lolololololol
Go play in the traffic sonny
by the way ..... so sue me ....
malcolm
Most people ignore spammers in the hope they will go away, but not you. By
replying to them, you encourage others to post their dross in newgroups.
For others who may not ne aware of your mannerisms, recently, when I was
replying to a poster who wanted to retrieve fault codes from his car, you
gave me a tirade of profanic abuse, and made insult upon my iq.
I don't support spammers, as I don't support those who abuse.
steveb
Your memory is as defective as your intelligence.
In fact, sonny Jim, all I did was say that Tech 2 provided a better
analysis than simple fault code retrieval. You jumped to the erroneous
conclusion that I had a vested interest in that remark, and became abusive.
If you want me to dig out the evidence, it's easy enough. You then lost it
completely when you were made to face the fact you had got it wrong, and
attempted to belittle me even more.
You are a windbag, who looks even more stupid with each increasingly
desperate and misplaced attack on me. I haven't even started on you yet, so
I suggest you use your killfile quicksmart, because you don't have the
intelligence for a decent argument.
Your latest trollish attempt to inflame me was a quite stupid response in
this thread to my reporting of a spammer who is trying to criminally rip
off people who post here.
Quite why you felt this was an inappropriate post, yet your attack on me
was to be considered decent, honest and appropriate, is beyond me. Add the
word "hypocrite" to the other accurate charges.
Be clear - you attacked first, and had your arse spanked .... maybe you
liked it, because you keep coming back for more :)
steveb
ps. I didn't reply to the spammer ... you stupid little man. I simple
posted the abuse address to encourage others to end his criminal
activities. That post is entirely in line with every Usenet convention on
spam that I know of. If you know different, please tell me ...
Meanwhile, a village appears to have mislaid it's idiot, did you wander
off?
malcolm
never whipped me, and never could. I won't lower myself to your misuse of
the English language, and somehow you think this makes you right. The
original comment you made about the Tech2 I had no problem with. I simply
pointed out that anyone could retrieve fault codes from their Vectra without
special equipment, to which you belittled my contribution. Check the
original posts if you wish, and you will see that it was YOU who started the
abuse with your ridiculous insults.
I have been a car tech for almost 30-years..Having started my own business
some 20-years ago. I own the company, which is very successful, and has a
customer base stretching into the thousands. Not bad for a halfwit, eh?
steveb
and wrote:
> Check the
>original posts if you wish, and you will see that it was YOU who started the
>abuse with your ridiculous insults.
Ok, for the halfwit, I will do this the once!
In message: ddJTb.16164$YV1....@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net you wrote:
>Why pay to have the codes pulled, when all you need is a piece of wire? The
>following url tells you how to pull the codes from a vectra without special
>equipment, hence no cost.
In message: kg0v1015u2m1kgkmu...@4ax.com I replied:
>This is fine for basic fault codes ... doesn't come even close to Tech 2
>analysis tho
This, apparently is the rubbishing and abuse I am guilty of ....
To this vicious abuse you responded in message:
YqVTb.16778$JL4.1...@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net
>And your Tech 2 doesn't come anywhere near my Snap-On grafix. And my dad's
>bigger than your dad...lol
You will agree that this was a considered and "adult" reply ... and I
actually don't give a fuck about your Snap-off intelligence.
Anyway, In message: f8902096bnmuip7uc...@4ax.com I ignored
your infantile jibe, and replied:
>I don't have a Tech 2 ....
>
>Anyone who insists basic fault code reading comes even close to providing
>the analysis a Tech 2 offers, has few opinions worth hearing
This was met, in message:
_42Ub.16815$YV1....@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net with the following
nonsense, which, as is your wont, finished with yet another jibe .....
curiously, you are now two up, I have as yet made no personal comments
about you at all. You are simply incapable of reasoned argument, resorting
to the playground at the first hint of another opinion.
>No one claimed that code reading is comparitive to data flow reading. Code
>reading has its uses, such as confirming a bad sensor.
>I have over 30-years experience in engine diagnostics with which to back up
>my claim.
>Your statements are almost non-sequitur, and are of little help to anyone.
>My statement and advices were designed to save people their hard earned
>money.
>Have you punctured any kids' footballs recently?
At this point, I had had quite enough of your moronic ranting and said
this: bjj1201pltkitbcou...@4ax.com
>Bwaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaa
>
>fuckwit
Quite frankly, you asked for it.
Now then. Which bit of this history would you like to rewrite, yet again?
You are a fuckwit and a halfwit, and you haven't the good sense to shut up,
so you get just what you deserve.
You accused me of going after you with abuse, yet clearly you are wrong.
You began the infantile jibes, and somehow that's ok, because "your Dad is
bigger than mine"
You asked me to show you the posts, well there they are .... can you read?
Now then, about this "libel" I am apparently guilty of ......
Bwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Martin
<big snip>
Deuce ?
Seriously, kids, I enjoy this NG - even though I'm a rotten car-fixer.
Disagreement expressed with some eloquence and no vulgar language seems
fine. But not only do I find words being used which I treasure for
exclusive use when scraping the skin off my knuckles while lying on my back
in a pool of muddy oil, but the bandwidth is being gobbled up by repeats.
Let's accept you're both partly right and both partly wrong and move on -
even if that may not be the case.
Smile, everyone
--
Martin
[remove barrier to reply]
steveb
and wrote:
>Let's accept you're both partly right and both partly wrong and move on -
>even if that may not be the case.
I thought we had mate ... until he started again, in this thread :)
malcolm
I replied to your post with humour, to which you gave your foul and filthy
reply in post. As for calling me a f***ing halfwit...POT, KETTLE AND BLACK,
TROLL.
malcolm
"Martin" <n...@ngngng.BARRIER.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5F8Yb.6956$cb7....@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net...
newsgroup that I can, afterall, that is what the newsgroup was designed for.
steveb
and wrote:
> As for calling me a f***ing halfwit...
I just go on the evidence ... as I said, use your killfile if you know how
...
If you follow me into anymore threads ... I'll spank your tushy again!
malcolm
I'll make a deal with you, Steveb. Stop with the profanic insults on my
person, and I won't give you any grief.
You may have misunderstood the humour intended in my earlier posts, and if
you did, I'll accept that there was a communitive break-down.
When you mentioned the Tech 2, I thought I might be getting into a debate
with another tech who owns one, hence my referral to the Grafix system.
Having used both, I find the latter to be of more use in diagnostics. If
this is of interest to you, I am still willing to explain why I am inclined
to prefer the Grafix system...I'm sure it is of no interest to the layman,
but probably is to the avid DIYers and professional techs.