In sixth grade, our teacher was talking about such things as evolution
versus creation theory. I already understood that Moses's very short
talk about the origin of mankind was for undeveloped (not to be confused
with uncivilized) people.
In fact, Jesus uses lots of parables in the New Testament. And in fact,
the people of Moses's time had no use for evolution theory. His
audience, people more civilized than the following troll's ancestors
would have stoned Moses for mentioning evolution theory. The people
probably wanted an explanation for their origin, but of course proposing
evolution theory or suggesting they use the scientific method to
discover the answer would have gone over like a lead balloon. Also,
evolution theory has nothing to do with biblical Christianity.
It was a parable. It worked for the people at the time. It allowed them
to think about more important things, like survival.
The cannibal left suck at logic.
--
Gronk <invalid net.invalid> wrote in news:nhp1hg$qrj$21
news.mixmin.net:
> Path:
eternal-september.org!
mx02.eternal-september.org!
feeder.eternal-september.org!
news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: Gronk <invalid net.invalid>
> Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
rec.arts.tv,rec.crafts.metalworking
> Subject: Re: What the Bible says about Christians
> Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 01:08:33 -0600
> Organization: 2.0
> Message-ID: <nhp1hg$qrj$21
news.mixmin.net>
> References: <13ifjb9t0kv2mva97glgdqrbd0ut8hc5es
4ax.com> <mjmfjb95sbp2efl14q6lfu8bt2n6mgn282
4ax.com> <69nfjb1o27mq6ladoe2591ubmsnihv0e8v
4ax.com> <baufjbhs62llip7h7lcl7ig563mjuj948v
4ax.com> <150520161814342819%YourName YourISP.com> <s2egjbhoa7bdv51f7dtfe586btv7vra0df
4ax.com> <XnsA6095E61C9A74noemailattnet 216.166.97.131> <qplhjbdp0rb8a8255nbklhdksg1iq93dhr
4ax.com> <rjvhjb5lddgb2au6n59kpvt99u8738gaq6
4ax.com> <KG8_y.214166$ml2.126928 fx14.fr7> <shlijb5dn1rksdtkaod6ke8pms13eiu95o
4ax.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Injection-Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 07:08:32 -0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info:
news.mixmin.net; posting-host="c9d8e6e77d75ea751f8e059f17c5e2192a846b4d"; logging-data="27507"; mail-complaints-to="abuse
mixmin.net"
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40
> In-Reply-To: <shlijb5dn1rksdtkaod6ke8pms13eiu95o
4ax.com>
> Xref:
mx02.eternal-september.org alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1832560
rec.arts.tv:1057532 rec.crafts.metalworking:476029
>
> Gunner Asch wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 May 2016 17:41:16 -0700, Brian Girecky
>> <
abc.xyz gardner.shitbags.con> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/15/2016 3:57 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 15 May 2016 16:10:12 -0400, clare
snyder.on.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 15 May 2016 09:22:41 -0500, Mitchell Holman
>>>>> <noemail
comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Gunner Asch <gunnerasch
gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:s2egjbhoa7bdv51f7dtfe586btv7vra0df
4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 15 May 2016 18:14:34 +1200, Your Name <YourName YourISP.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <baufjbhs62llip7h7lcl7ig563mjuj948v
4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>> <clare
snyder.on.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I may be gullible to believe there is a god, but not as gullible as
>>>>>>>>> anyone who believes there is any proof there is no god.
>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There's no proof there is a God. There's no proof that anything in the
>>>>>>>> Bible is even true. In fact all the real proof points to it being a
>>>>>>>> load of fictional crap heavily edited (if not written!) by the church
>>>>>>>> in the Middle Ages, just like the idiotic fake "Shroud".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no proof there ISNT a god(s).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or a Tooth Fairy, or the Great Pumpkin,
>>>>>> or an Illuminati conspiracy. You can have
>>>>>> all sort of fun demanding proof of a negative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The "shroud" hasnt been proven a fake either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "In 1998, the shroud was carbon dated to the end of
>>>>>> the 13th century, lending support to those who say
>>>>>> it is a medieval forgery."
>>>>>>
http://tinyurl.com/obpfulb
>>>>>>
>>>>> Which is about as close to proof as science is likely to get.
>>>>> Proving the shroud is a fake is a LONG way from proving there is no
>>>>> God.
>>>>
>>>> What is the accuracy range of carbon dating? Weeks? Months? Years?
>>>> Decades? Centuries? Particularly carbon dating as performed 20 yrs
>>>> ago. What is its accuracy?
>>>
>>> Plenty accurate when it comes to things only a few hundred years old.
>>>
http://ncse.com/cej/3/2/answers-to-creationist-attacks-carbon-14-dating
>>
>> Thanks for the nice article. However...it didnt say that it was
>> "plenty accurate to things only a few hundred years old..and in
>> fact..said it made "older things" look "younger"..up to about 5000 yrs
>> ago. Now again I ask..what is the accuracy mean? The best one can
>> expect from C14 dating of things from say..the 13th century as opposed
>> to the 1st century?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Since C14 dating is plenty enough to demolish the genesis myth, the rest
> falls like a house of cards and the shroud just becomes a piece of cloth.
>
>