I can see the file attached to my previous message, so my server
appears to be carrying it. Can anyone else see it?
--
Jay Linn
Habeas corpus, habeas mentis. (Latin canis).
-Scott
"Scott Seltzer" <sc...@juggler.net> wrote in message
news:c1d4pj$jv3$1...@news2.netvision.net.il...
> The binary didn't come up on my servers for me but your response did.
>
> Can you see my 60.4KB attachment? It's a drawing my 4 yr old just made of
me
> juggling (actually holding the balls after I finished juggling).
>
> -Scott
>
> "Jay Linn" <J...@feck.arse.gerrels> wrote in message
> news:wCk_b.9215$h44.1...@stones.force9.net...
>Well, it appeared on my server with the attachment. Did anyone else get it?
>
>-Scott
No, the message was missing entirely for me.
...JAG
Edward Woodward would.
Naomi
>Jay Linn wrote:
>> Hola earthlets,
>>
>> Have a binary : attached file is 11-box-stack.jpg, ~95KB.
>
> I can see the file attached to my previous message, so my server
>appears to be carrying it. Can anyone else see it?
Jay, we went through this a year ago - as you can see I've saved the
messages. Apparently some people can post and read binaries here and some
not.
...JAG
> Jay, we went through this a year ago - as you can see I've saved the
> messages. Apparently some people can post and read binaries here and some
> not.
> ...JAG
Yeah, I know, mea culpa.
To tell the truth, after recent fist-waving at r.j, I just wondered
how many people monitor f.r.j these days, and I thought my last
paragraph might prompt some responses. I'm a troll, albeit a fairly
polite one :-) Also, last time I think I flagged it up on r.j
beforehand didn't I?
Anyhow, the conclusion is unmistakable - 5 people read f.r.j!
--
Jay Linn
Proud to be a fiver!