I should like to be the first (on this group anyway)...
Michael Fanner
knighthood.
So now they give them out to snake oil salesmen they might just as well
give us all one and get it over with.
--
Sir Mick.
Ron Clark
Well I reckon he deserves it more than that shrunken, adulterous,
big-lipped, ear-insulting grand dad who shares your name.
The Gates foundation is one of the biggest donors to charities and
relief organisations in the world.
--
®óñ© © ² * ¹°°²
Michael Fanner
> Well I reckon he deserves it more than that shrunken, adulterous,
> big-lipped, ear-insulting grand dad who shares your name.
They deserve it about the same. IE, not at all. Gates got it for services
to British commerce (or some such trash as that)
> The Gates foundation is one of the biggest donors to charities and
> relief organisations in the world.
On a percentage of gross wealth basis, my mum gives a lot more than him.
Of course, she doesn't bleat about her generosity all over the front pages
so she'll never get any sort of honour.
Also on the basis that one billion is more than anyone can ever need, I
figure he could give 50 billion and not miss a cent of it. Now *that*
would do some good.
--
Mick.
Ron Clark
Undoubtedly.
But does he have a spare $50,000,000,000?
I don't, you don't, so we won't get a nonner this year or next year.
Thank god.
I think the honours system is a load of bollox, the royal family is a
load of inbred tossers and the house of lords is a wa*kers retreat.
The European CAP is a scam, gives most of its support to the biggest
landowners in the country, the French are users, the Krauts are bad,
but practised, losers and Italian tanks have five reverse gears
The Greeks and Turks are considered by some to be perverts and the
whole wurld is going down the tubes big time.
Even the Thais and Vietnamese are exporting avian flu to Tesco etc
and Saddam is not a donor to the RSPCA. What is to become of Mother
Nature? Why could P. Charles not find a prettier horse to ride?
Why is the Queen hammering innocent peasants with her walking stick?
EMNTK
--
®óñ© © ² * ¹°°²
s
Michael Fanner
> But does he have a spare $50,000,000,000?
Last I heard, he had a personal wedge of 51 billion. So he could easily
spare 50 of em.
> Why is the Queen hammering innocent peasants with her walking stick?
Everybody's got to something with their walking stick.
--
Mick.
purplehaze
"Michael Fanner" <michae...@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.01.26....@onetel.net.uk...
One of my former colleages mentioned he'd been to the Palace once while his
Dad collected his medal. Only I misheard and wondered what on earth he'd
gone all the way to London for a gonk for. "Gong man, Gong!"...
Hazel
Michael Fanner
> Only I misheard and wondered what on earth he'd
> gone all the way to London for a gonk for.
And you were right to ask that. <lol>
--
Mick.
Humbug
"I've forgotten the words."
BTW, where is that (Bob?
--
Humbug
Ron Clark
Bob Goddard
<hum...@tofee.net> writes
He's rather busy at the moment and Mark has been doing much of his
reading for him.
(Bob
--
>---B---------| This space unintentionally left |---NB - "News"--->
Goddard | blank. | may be updated
>---b---------| |--occasionally--->
www.goatherd.freeserve.co.uk/sheds.html www.bobsticks.co.uk
^Ï^
> He's rather busy at the moment and Mark has been doing much of his
> reading for him.
Busy bloke, that Mark. Care for a Pint, (Bob?
--
^Ï^ http://www.tinyurl.co.uk/2d2g Bye-bye BBC, bye-bye.
^Ï^
>>Only I misheard and wondered what on earth he'd
>> gone all the way to London for a gonk for.
I'm just back from Lunnon, and I didn't get a gonk. <snif>
> And you were right to ask that.
They're dedd gud, yer gonks.
> <lol>
Leary Old Lout?
Michael Fanner
>> And you were right to ask that.
>
> They're dedd gud, yer gonks.
I might have had one once but it was so long ago I've forgotten
--
Mick.
Bob Goddard
<snip...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> writes
>Bob Goddard wrote:
>
>> He's rather busy at the moment and Mark has been doing much of his
>> reading for him.
>
>Busy bloke, that Mark. Care for a Pint, (Bob?
I think Haze is just pulling one for me, but I get confused easily so
I'd better say yes just to be on the safe side.
Cheers,
^Ï^
>
>>> He's rather busy at the moment and Mark has been doing much of his
>>> reading for him.
>>
>>Busy bloke, that Mark. Care for a Pint, (Bob?
>
> I think Haze is just pulling one for me, but I get confused easily so
> I'd better say yes just to be on the safe side.
>
> Cheers,
One in the can, then; and cheers to yer goodself, (Bob.
--
^Ï^ http://www.tinyurl.co.uk/2d2g Fomenting sedition on the Outernet.
N. Korean Plutonium bombs trigger Echelon surveillance alarm, *WHOOPEE!*
purplehaze
"Bob Goddard" <sp...@spam.spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:R0Nv8jPf...@godwit.plus.com...
> In message <48880445....@scolopax.snipeco.fsnet.co.uk>, ^Ï^
> <snip...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> writes
> >Bob Goddard wrote:
> >
> >> He's rather busy at the moment and Mark has been doing much of his
> >> reading for him.
> >
> >Busy bloke, that Mark. Care for a Pint, (Bob?
>
> I think Haze is just pulling one for me, but I get confused easily so
> I'd better say yes just to be on the safe side.
A pair of pints for your fine and lovely self.
Withaze and I
purplehaze
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:16:35 +0000, ^Ï^ wrote:
>
> >> And you were right to ask that.
> >
> > They're dedd gud, yer gonks.
>
> I might have had one once but it was so long ago I've forgotten
Is it wise to go gonkless for extended periods? You might want to get
yourself re-gonked.
Hazel
Michael Fanner
>> > They're dedd gud, yer gonks.
>>
>> I might have had one once but it was so long ago I've forgotten
>
> Is it wise to go gonkless for extended periods? You might want to get
> yourself re-gonked.
Well you scared me there and I gave it some serious thought. I *don't*
know for sure if you're right but just in case I've scanned Yellow Pages
and I've got some people coming round over the weekend to give me a quote.
I may *not* take the lowest one.
--
Mick.
^Ï^
>> >> And you were right to ask that.
>> >
>> > They're dedd gud, yer gonks.
>>
>> I might have had one once but it was so long ago I've forgotten
>
> Is it wise to go gonkless for extended periods? You might want to get
> yourself re-gonked.
Gonk me! Gonk me-e-e-e!
--
^Ï^ http://www.tinyurl.co.uk/2d2g Hands off our BBC!
purplehaze
Wise move there, Michael. You don't want to end up on a Gonkers from Hell
tv show.
Hazel
Michael Fanner
> purplehaze wrote:
>
>>> >> And you were right to ask that.
>>> >
>>> > They're dedd gud, yer gonks.
>>>
>>> I might have had one once but it was so long ago I've forgotten
>>
>> Is it wise to go gonkless for extended periods? You might want to get
>> yourself re-gonked.
>
> Gonk me! Gonk me-e-e-e!
Gonk me with your rhythm styck?
--
Mick.
Michael Fanner
> You don't want to end up on a Gonkers from Hell
> tv show.
Well that is true but then that might be my big break in the entertainment
industry. The all singing all dancing 'Badly Regonked Sparky from
Hampshire'.
I might even get on Richard and Judy.
--
Mick.
Ron Clark
Gonk fishing
--
®óñ© © ² * ¹°°²
Ron Clark
Bloody hell, that's a threesome I'd pay good money to miss!
On the other hand....................................
--
®óñ© © ² * ¹°°²
^Ï^
>>You don't want to end up on a Gonkers from Hell
>> tv show.
>
> Well that is true but then that might be my big break in the
> entertainment industry. The all singing all dancing 'Badly Regonked
> Sparky from Hampshire'.
>
> I might even get on Richard and Judy.
That's the way to do it!
^Ï^
>>>>> >> And you were right to ask that.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > They're dedd gud, yer gonks.
>>>>>
>>>>> I might have had one once but it was so long ago I've forgotten
>>>>
>>>> Is it wise to go gonkless for extended periods? You might want to
>>>> get yourself re-gonked.
>>>
>>> Gonk me! Gonk me-e-e-e!
>>
>>Gonk me with your rhythm styck?
>
> Gonk fishing
Wot bait d'yer use, WonK?
^Ï^
Je t'adore, Ych lieber dych.
purplehaze
"Ron Clark" <r...@spamall.com> wrote in message
news:kdhl10ligju7ngm21...@4ax.com...
Gonk but not forgotten.
Hazel
purplehaze
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 21:00:08 +0000, "Michael Fanner"
> <michae...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:09:28 +0000, purplehaze wrote:
> >
> >> You don't want to end up on a Gonkers from Hell
> >> tv show.
> >
> >Well that is true but then that might be my big break in the
entertainment
> >industry. The all singing all dancing 'Badly Regonked Sparky from
> >Hampshire'.
> >
> >I might even get on Richard and Judy.
>
> Bloody hell, that's a threesome I'd pay good money to miss!
<averts gaze>
Hazel
Michael Fanner
> Hands off our BBC!
Yer just a Hutton delialist. The man worked out the truth as he was told
to see it.
What more can anyone do?
--
Mick.
^Ï^
>
>> >>>> >> And you were right to ask that.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > They're dedd gud, yer gonks.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I might have had one once but it was so long ago I've forgotten
>> >>>
>> >>> Is it wise to go gonkless for extended periods? You might want
>> >>> to
> get
>> >>> yourself re-gonked.
>> >>
>> >> Gonk me! Gonk me-e-e-e!
>> >
>> >Gonk me with your rhythm styck?
>>
>> Gonk fishing
>
> Gonk but not forgotten.
I've Gonk razey, Hazey.
--
^Ď^ http://www.tinyurl.co.uk/2d2g Hands off our BBC!
Michael Fanner
>> I might even get on Richard and Judy.
>
> That's the way to do it!
Twould be one ambition out of the way.
--
Mick.
Michael Fanner
> <averts gaze>
Don't trip over that
Ooops.
--
Mick.
^Ï^
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:50:29 +0000, ^Ï^ wrote:
>
>> Hands off our BBC!
>
> Yer just a Hutton delialist. The man worked out the truth as he was
> told to see it.
Wot's a delialist? And yes, Hutton did the job he was put there to do;
when did a Law Lord *ever* criticise the Gummint? I must admit that I'm
utterly gobsmacked at just how one-sided his putative report is,
though.
> What more can anyone do?
Foment sedition on both the Inter- and Outer-net.
^Ï^
>>> I might even get on Richard and Judy.
>>
>> That's the way to do it!
>
> Twould be one ambition out of the way.
Judy, Judy, Judy! <brandishes club>
Oops, here comes the Copper and the Crocodile.
Michael Fanner
> Wot's a delialist?
It's a made up word spelt wrong.
--
Mick.
Michael Fanner
> Michael Fanner wrote:
>
>>>> I might even get on Richard and Judy.
>>>
>>> That's the way to do it!
>>
>> Twould be one ambition out of the way.
>
> Judy, Judy, Judy! <brandishes club>
> Oops, here comes the Copper and the Crocodile.
Ah, I see where you're coming from. Or going to. Or something
--
Mick.
Ron Clark
<snip...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>Wot's a delialist? And yes, Hutton did the job he was put there to do;
>when did a Law Lord *ever* criticise the Gummint? I must admit that I'm
>utterly gobsmacked at just how one-sided his putative report is,
>though.
I thought his report was supposed to be definitive, not putative,
whatever one might think about the limited frame of reference..
Gilligan admitted errors and unwarranted allegations of guvvinment
duplicity were committed in his first unscripted broadcast interview
which were never withdrawn. Gilligan shopped his source (or at
least Susan's source) to the Select Committee and emailed them with
embarrassing questions to ask him.
Dyke backed up Gilligan blindly and totally, but admitted, that for at
least a month, as Editor-in-Chief he had not bothered to read a
transcript of the first broadcast nor ask to see Gilligan's notes.
Kelly was authorised to speak to journalists but under strict rules
and managerial control. His little chats to Gilligan and Susan were
unauthorised and he would quite probably have been facing disciplinary
action.
IANAL or a learned judge but given the purpose of the enquiry I might
well have come to the same conclusions. I saw Tom Mangold
interviewed, a long-term friend of Kelly, and to me, he didn't seem to
have too much of a problem with the results.
IANA blind supporter of new tony and these are my own personal views
<no warranties of guarantees apply>
The National gutter rags seem determined to whip this report up into a
disaster for the guvvinment for their own purposes,
But, didn't 'Something of the night' have a face like a
badly-smacked arse after reading it, (or like a bear with toothache
and a mouthful of hornets)
--
®óñ© © ² * ¹°°²#
Michael Fanner
> The National gutter rags seem determined to whip this report up into a
> disaster for the guvvinment for their own purposes,
Don't you think that it's right that they should question this report.
From the start I wondered what the point of an enquiry was. Surely the
inquest would answer all the questions that needed to be answered.
In 28 days time we'll find out if the coroner feels there is any merit in
re-opening that inquest.
--
Mick.
Ron Clark
<michae...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>In 28 days time we'll find out if the coroner feels there is any merit in
>re-opening that inquest.
If it takes as long to schedule as the inquest on Diana I'm not going
to hold my breath/ And even that one was opened and put on the back
burner for at least a year.
--
®óñ© © ² * ¹°°²
purplehaze
"^Ï^" <snip...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4288908.o...@scolopax.snipeco.fsnet.co.uk...
> purplehaze wrote:
>
> >
> >> >>>> >> And you were right to ask that.
> >> >>>> >
> >> >>>> > They're dedd gud, yer gonks.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I might have had one once but it was so long ago I've forgotten
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Is it wise to go gonkless for extended periods? You might want
> >> >>> to
> > get
> >> >>> yourself re-gonked.
> >> >>
> >> >> Gonk me! Gonk me-e-e-e!
> >> >
> >> >Gonk me with your rhythm styck?
> >>
> >> Gonk fishing
> >
> > Gonk but not forgotten.
>
> I've Gonk razey, Hazey.
#You know he's gonk gonk gonk, hip shaking King Creole...
Hazel, who's real real gonk
purplehaze
Oof! <rubs extremities>
Hazel
^Ï^
> But, didn't 'Something of the night' have a face like a
> badly-smacked arse after reading it
Didn't see that, but it wouldn't surprise me. IMO they (politicians)
are all tarred with the same brush; I eschew 'em all. Put me down as
utterly cynical about the whole sorry business, war included.
^Ï^
>
>> >> >>>> >> And you were right to ask that.
>> >> >>>> >
>> >> >>>> > They're dedd gud, yer gonks.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> I might have had one once but it was so long ago I've
>> >> >>>> forgotten
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Is it wise to go gonkless for extended periods? You might
>> >> >>> want to
>> > get
>> >> >>> yourself re-gonked.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Gonk me! Gonk me-e-e-e!
>> >> >
>> >> >Gonk me with your rhythm styck?
>> >>
>> >> Gonk fishing
>> >
>> > Gonk but not forgotten.
>>
>> I've Gonk razey, Hazey.
>
> #You know he's gonk gonk gonk, hip shaking King Creole...
>
> Hazel, who's real real gonk
Solid Gonk, Man. -- Louie, King of the Swingers..
--
^Ï^ http://www.tinyurl.co.uk/2d2g Hands off our BBC!
Ron Clark
<snip...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
>> But, didn't 'Something of the night' have a face like a
>> badly-smacked arse after reading it
>
>Didn't see that, but it wouldn't surprise me. IMO they (politicians)
>are all tarred with the same brush; I eschew 'em all. Put me down as
>utterly cynical about the whole sorry business, war included
Yeh, nobody appreciates a good war these days.including me.
Don't really matter about voting, really, the f**king guvvinment
always gets in..
--
®óñ© © ² * ¹°°²
Ron Clark
I think I may be Gonk razy too.
--
®óñ© © ² * ¹°°²
^Ï^
> Don't really matter about voting, really, the f**king guvvinment
> always gets in..
Regrettably, they never get out.
Michael Fanner
> If it takes as long to schedule as the inquest on Diana I'm not going
> to hold my breath/ And even that one was opened and put on the back
> burner for at least a year.
Different thing entirely. No inquest was scheduled on the D. death in this
country because les frogs had one. It's only Dodi's daddy's lunacy that
finally got one started over here. It was adjourned so that the Brit
coroner could be got up to speed, as it were.
An inquest was started on Dr Kelly and promptly adjourned when the enquiry
was announced. I read somewhere that a judicial enquiry can replace an
inquest, so presuming that is true, it's likely that it was assumed the
Hutton's report would draw a line under things. However the coroner
expressed doubts a couple of weeks back about the way things were going
and said that when he'd read the report he would decide whether to review
the evidence - including all the witheld statements - and decide whether
to re-open the inquest. Apparently, by law he can make no announcement for
28 days after the enquiry ends.
You may be right about not holding your breath, but believe me, if the
coroner decides to proceed, it won't be off the front pages till it's
done.
--
Mick.
Michael Fanner
> <rubs extremities>
Need any help?
--
Mick.
Bob Goddard
<hazey.sam...@btinternet.com> writes
>
>"Bob Goddard" <sp...@spam.spam.invalid> wrote in message
>news:R0Nv8jPf...@godwit.plus.com...
>> In message <48880445....@scolopax.snipeco.fsnet.co.uk>, ^Ï^
>> <snip...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> writes
>> >Bob Goddard wrote:
>> >
>> >> He's rather busy at the moment and Mark has been doing much of his
>> >> reading for him.
>> >
>> >Busy bloke, that Mark. Care for a Pint, (Bob?
>>
>> I think Haze is just pulling one for me, but I get confused easily so
>> I'd better say yes just to be on the safe side.
>
>A pair of pints for your fine and lovely self.
>
>Withaze and I
Thanks, they'll go well with me new pair of glasses.
(Bob
--
>---B---------| This space unintentionally left |---NB - "News"--->
Goddard | blank. | may be updated
>---b---------| |--occasionally--->
www.goatherd.freeserve.co.uk/sheds.html www.bobsticks.co.uk
Bob Goddard
<hazey.sam...@btinternet.com> writes
>> >
>> >Gonk me with your rhythm styck?
>>
>> Gonk fishing
>
>Gonk but not forgotten.
Hasn't it Gonk Wyatt?
Bob Goddard
Fanner <michae...@onetel.net.uk> writes
>On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:35:14 +0000, ^Ď^ wrote:
>
>> Wot's a delialist?
>
>It's a made up word spelt wrong.
Oh no it's not! I know someone called Delia who's always making lists.
The Odd Stray
B*gger!
Thassa' dismayingly appropriate comment, coming into our election year
...
Odd - depressed at the state of Leftpondian politics
^Ï^
>>>Didn't see that, but it wouldn't surprise me. IMO they (politicians)
>>>are all tarred with the same brush; I eschew 'em all. Put me down as
>>>utterly cynical about the whole sorry business, war included
>>
>>Yeh, nobody appreciates a good war these days.including me.
>>
>>Don't really matter about voting, really, the f**king guvvinment
>>always gets in..
>
>
> B*gger!
>
> Thassa' dismayingly appropriate comment, coming into our election year
Regrettably, it's strictly accurate, too; it's driven me to drink.
Can I get one for you, Odd? We have a special on Ringwood's Old Thumper
this weekend.
at the mo.
^Ï^
>>> Wot's a delialist?
>>
>>It's a made up word spelt wrong.
>
> Oh no it's not! I know someone called Delia who's always making lists.
I deny Delia, instigator of shopping lists as she is.
^Ï^
>>> >Busy bloke, that Mark. Care for a Pint, (Bob?
>>>
>>> I think Haze is just pulling one for me, but I get confused easily
>>> so I'd better say yes just to be on the safe side.
>>
>>A pair of pints for your fine and lovely self.
>>
>>Withaze and I
>
> Thanks, they'll go well with me new pair of glasses.
Suddenly the World snaps into sharp focus; scary!
I take mine off when I'm down the pub, on the principle
that everything will be blurry later and I may as well
start as I mean to continue.
^Ï^
> In message <bvfu5l$f5r$1...@sparta.btinternet.com>, purplehaze
> <hazey.sam...@btinternet.com> writes
>>> >
>>> >Gonk me with your rhythm styck?
>>>
>>> Gonk fishing
>>
>>Gonk but not forgotten.
>
> Hasn't it Gonk Wyatt?
Gonk lean round the bend, more like.
Michael Fanner
>>> Wot's a delialist?
>>
>>It's a made up word spelt wrong.
>
> Oh no it's not! I know someone called Delia who's always making lists.
Ah but Bob, you've missed the point here. I made up a word (a slightly
different word from the one in question (above)) and spelled it
incorrectly - that's if there is a correct way of spelling a made up word.
The error could (and it seems, did) result in a word that you claim
exists, based on your 'knowing' this Delia bird.
The only lists I make are to port (or starboard) as I walk home from the
pub.
Come to think of it, I make the same list in the passenger seat of the car
when my good lady wife picks me up from the pub. Except the 'starboard'
option is a no no due to the effect it has on her driving.
--
Mick.
Humbug
forgotten the words."
>In message <pan.2004.01.31....@onetel.net.uk>, Michael
>Fanner <michae...@onetel.net.uk> writes
>>On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:35:14 +0000, ^Ď^ wrote:
>>
>>> Wot's a delialist?
>>
>>It's a made up word spelt wrong.
>
>Oh no it's not! I know someone called Delia who's always making lists.
Those are called "recipes", (Bob.
HTH
--
Humbug
Humbug
"I've forgotten the words."
>On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:50:29 +0000, ^Ď^ wrote:
>
>>> I might even get on Richard and Judy.
>>
>> That's the way to do it!
>
>Twould be one ambition out of the way.
IRTA an abomination
--
Humbug
^Ï^
>>>> Wot's a delialist?
>>>
>>>It's a made up word spelt wrong.
>>
>>Oh no it's not! I know someone called Delia who's always making lists.
>
> Those are called "recipes", (Bob.
Except when they're shopping lists full of ingredients
that can only be bought at aSnibsrusy...
^Ï^
>>>> I might even get on Richard and Judy.
>>>
>>> That's the way to do it!
>>
>>Twould be one ambition out of the way.
>
> IRTA an abomination
They're so far past their sell-by, aren't they?
[aside: Can you see this, Humbug?]
purplehaze
>
> > <rubs extremities>
>
> Need any help?
Some reckon I'm beyond help.
Hazel
^Ï^
>> > <rubs extremities>
>>
>> Need any help?
>
> Some reckon I'm beyond help.
# One Step Beyond!
Humbug
forgotten the words."
>[aside: Can you see this, Humbug?]
Today, yes I can :-)
I still can't see Hazel though :-(
--
Humbug
^Ï^
>>[aside: Can you see this, Humbug?]
>
> Today, yes I can :-)
Good-oh; I thimk Gazeta must have had trouble with
MyDoom over the last couple of days.
> I still can't see Hazel though :-(
# Well I woke up this morning, still got those Brokenworld Blues...
--
^Ï^ http://www.tinyurl.co.uk/2d2g Hands off our BBC!
The Cherokees are after me, but I just keep rollin' along.
Ron Clark
A good embonpoint
--
®óñ© © ² * ¹°°²
The Odd Stray
Ta, kind Wading B!rd S!r.
Don't think I've tried the Old Thumper yet ... so it'll be an
adventure.
Odd
^Ï^
>>>>Don't really matter about voting, really, the f**king guvvinment
>>>>always gets in..
>>>
>>> B*gger!
>>>
>>> Thassa' dismayingly appropriate comment, coming into our election
>>> year
>>
>>Regrettably, it's strictly accurate, too; it's driven me to drink.
>>Can I get one for you, Odd? We have a special on Ringwood's Old
>>Thumper this weekend.
>
> Ta, kind Wading B!rd S!r.
Ooh, please don't call me S!r, it makes me so nervous.
> Don't think I've tried the Old Thumper yet ... so it'll be an
> adventure.
That it will; I should sit down for it, if I were you.
--
^Ï^ http://www.tinyurl.co.uk/2d2g
I'm not quite clear about what you just spoke
Was that a parable, or a very subtle joke?
Humbug
forgotten the words."
>On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 17:03:35 +0000, ^Ï^
><snip...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> blethered:
>
>>Humbug wrote:
>>
>>>>[aside: Can you see this, Humbug?]
>>>
>>> Today, yes I can :-)
>>
>>Good-oh; I thimk Gazeta must have had trouble with
>>MyDoom over the last couple of days.
>>
>
><unrelated grumble> Wanted to read Muse lyrics, bliddy website only
>tried to give me a trojan dinnit? My poor violated PC, have to run the
>AV through everything now to check. Who puts trojans on websites FFS?
Grokster killed my desktop PC :-(
--
Humbug
Format C:
Y
Bah!
purplehaze
"Ron Clark" <r...@spamall.com> wrote in message
news:mscq10p3co0cimmt5...@4ax.com...
Must be the weather.
Hazel
purplehaze
"^Ï^" <snip...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1076057.t...@scolopax.snipeco.fsnet.co.uk...
> purplehaze wrote:
>
> >> > <rubs extremities>
> >>
> >> Need any help?
> >
> > Some reckon I'm beyond help.
>
> # One Step Beyond!
<starts off a Hazel Nutty Train around the bar>
Hazel
purplehaze
> Humbug wrote:
>
> >>[aside: Can you see this, Humbug?]
> >
> > Today, yes I can :-)
>
> Good-oh; I thimk Gazeta must have had trouble with
> MyDoom over the last couple of days.
>
> > I still can't see Hazel though :-(
>
#I'm going to bed again tonight
#If I wake up tomorrow morning
#I'll go to be tomorrow night...
Hazel, pinching a friends lyrics
^Ï^
> <unrelated grumble> Wanted to read Muse lyrics, bliddy website only
> tried to give me a trojan dinnit? My poor violated PC, have to run the
> AV through everything now to check. Who puts trojans on websites FFS?
Oof, what Bad People.
^Ï^
>>>Good-oh; I thimk Gazeta must have had trouble with
>>>MyDoom over the last couple of days.
>>>
>><unrelated grumble> Wanted to read Muse lyrics, bliddy website only
>>tried to give me a trojan dinnit? My poor violated PC, have to run the
>>AV through everything now to check. Who puts trojans on websites FFS?
>
> Grokster killed my desktop PC :-(
Embrace the Penguin, you two; you know it makes sense.
^Ï^
>> >>[aside: Can you see this, Humbug?]
>> >
>> >Today, yes I can :-)
>> >
>> >I still can't see Hazel though :-(
>>
>> A good embonpoint
>
> Must be the weather.
It's been pretty mild here lately.
Come to thimk of it, how /is/ the Mild today, Hazey?
If it's OK Ill try a pint, ta. Anyone else for one?
Humbug
forgotten the words."
>purplehaze wrote:
>
>>> >>[aside: Can you see this, Humbug?]
>>> >
>>> >Today, yes I can :-)
>>> >
>>> >I still can't see Hazel though :-(
>>>
>>> A good embonpoint
>>
>> Must be the weather.
>
>It's been pretty mild here lately.
>
>Come to thimk of it, how /is/ the Mild today, Hazey?
>If it's OK Ill try a pint, ta. Anyone else for one?
There's a good idea.
Mitchell and Butler's?
--
Brumbug
^Ï^
>>>> >I still can't see Hazel though :-(
>>>>
>>>> A good embonpoint
>>>
>>> Must be the weather.
>>
>>It's been pretty mild here lately.
>>
>>Come to thimk of it, how /is/ the Mild today, Hazey?
>>If it's OK Ill try a pint, ta. Anyone else for one?
>
> There's a good idea.
>
> Mitchell and Butler's?
Absolutely, a milder pint o' Mild you couldn't hope to find.
purplehaze
> purplehaze wrote:
>
> >> >>[aside: Can you see this, Humbug?]
> >> >
> >> >Today, yes I can :-)
> >> >
> >> >I still can't see Hazel though :-(
> >>
> >> A good embonpoint
> >
> > Must be the weather.
>
> It's been pretty mild here lately.
>
> Come to thimk of it, how /is/ the Mild today, Hazey?
> If it's OK Ill try a pint, ta. Anyone else for one?
I expect it's as mild as ever. <pours pint for Chief Taster> What's yer
verdict?
Hazel
Bob Goddard
<hum...@tofee.net> writes
Not in this case. Delia plays the double bass.
(Bob
--
>---B---------| This space unintentionally left |---NB - "News"--->
Goddard | blank. | may be updated
>---b---------| |--occasionally--->
www.goatherd.freeserve.co.uk/sheds.html www.bobsticks.co.uk
Bob Goddard
Fanner <michae...@onetel.net.uk> writes
>On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 01:40:31 +0000, Bob Goddard wrote:
>
>>>> Wot's a delialist?
>>>
>>>It's a made up word spelt wrong.
>>
>> Oh no it's not! I know someone called Delia who's always making lists.
>
>Ah but Bob, you've missed the point here.
This is normal.
>I made up a word (a slightly
>different word from the one in question (above))
Yes.
>and spelled it
>incorrectly -
Yes. Thereby spelling another made-up word correctly.
>that's if there is a correct way of spelling a made up word.
I suppose it's theoretically possible. But surely any way the maker-up
of the made-up word spells it himself would ipso fatso be correct?
>The error could (and it seems, did) result in a word that you claim
>exists, based on your 'knowing' this Delia bird.
This is true. Delia plays the double bass.
>The only lists I make are to port (or starboard) as I walk home from the
>pub.
That puts a different slant on it.
>Come to think of it, I make the same list in the passenger seat of the car
>when my good lady wife picks me up from the pub. Except the 'starboard'
>option is a no no due to the effect it has on her driving.
Have you considered a port-hand-drive car?
^Ï^
>> Come to thimk of it, how is the Mild today, Hazey?
>> If it's OK Ill try a pint, ta. Anyone else for one?
>
> I expect it's as mild as ever. <pours pint for Chief Taster> What's
> yer verdict?
Bloomineck Haze, that w*rks. Wotever you do, don't let me
have too many today; my bonce needs to come up for air.
purplehaze
> purplehaze wrote:
>
> >> Come to thimk of it, how is the Mild today, Hazey?
> >> If it's OK Ill try a pint, ta. Anyone else for one?
> >
> > I expect it's as mild as ever. <pours pint for Chief Taster> What's
> > yer verdict?
>
> Bloomineck Haze, that w*rks. Wotever you do, don't let me
> have too many today; my bonce needs to come up for air.
Well I'll do me best but I hate to stop you in full flight, as it were.
Hazel
^Ï^
>> Bloomineck Haze, that w*rks. Wotever you do, don't let me
>> have too many today; my bonce needs to come up for air.
>
> Well I'll do me best but I hate to stop you in full flight, as it
> were.
I'm walking everywhere at the moment, flight is a bit *too* *risky.*
purplehaze
> purplehaze wrote:
>
> >> Bloomineck Haze, that w*rks. Wotever you do, don't let me
> >> have too many today; my bonce needs to come up for air.
> >
> > Well I'll do me best but I hate to stop you in full flight, as it
> > were.
>
> I'm walking everywhere at the moment, flight is a bit *too* *risky.*
Grounded for repairs?
Hazel
purplehaze
> purplehaze wrote:
>
<sn!p>
> That's about the size of it, Hazey;
> that, and I don't want to get breathalysed.
Smart move. You can always hitch a ride on the beer scooter.
Hazel