Hi Mike,
I've unfortunately found another user too...
I've been doing few things, but nothing on Kosova-related topics.
No harassment so far.
cheers
Besnik
> I have been continually harassed by one user
> WhiteWriter�http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WhiteWriter�who deletes my
> work, renames everything to serbian cyrillic, hounds me, and generally
> destroys any fun I have at all in editing the wikipedia. He is the main
> reason why I have stopped.
>
> So does anyone else have a similar experience? I think it is time that
> we get together and have this user stopped. I cannot stand it any longer.
>
> thanks,
> mike
>
> --
> James Michael DuPont
> Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "FLOSSK" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> free-softwar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> free-software-conf...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/free-software-conference?hl=en.
Mike, you did that because you have no idea about the legal issues of
any Wikimedia chapter. No chapter is able to interfere in those
issues, because in that case it would be liable for the content.
Besides that, I gave you explanation in a private mail, which you
ignored and didn't transfer here. That's not nice.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FLOSSK" group.
To post to this group, send email to free-softwar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to free-software-conf...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/free-software-conference?hl=en.
Be that as you say, I don't see any rationale raising liability issues
on behalf of a defunct (FR) of Yugoslavia. How such claims could pretend
not to be biased?
cheers
Besnik
Më 04/19/2012 02:57 PM, Milos Rancic shkrojti:
Hello Milos,
Be that as you say, I don't see any rationale raising liability issues on behalf of a defunct (FR) of Yugoslavia. How such claims could pretend not to be biased?
cheers
Besnik
Më 04/19/2012 02:57 PM, Milos Rancic shkrojti:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:37, Mike Dupont
<jamesmikedupont@googlemail.com> wrote:
I have removed my membership from wikimedia serbia because they are not
doing anything for helping people in kosovo to maintain the neutrality of
the articles.
Mike, you did that because you have no idea about the legal issues of
any Wikimedia chapter. No chapter is able to interfere in those
issues, because in that case it would be liable for the content.
Besides that, I gave you explanation in a private mail, which you
ignored and didn't transfer here. That's not nice.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FLOSSK" group.
To post to this group, send email to free-software-conference@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to free-software-conference+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/free-software-conference?hl=en.
You missed the point. It's strictly connected with laws of Serbia
(with or without Kosovo, no matter). If we say that we can decide
something on Wikipedia, any moron from Belgrade would be able to sue
Wikimedia Serbia because of the content of Wikipedia. And process
wouldn't be about Kosovo, but about, let's say, facts which some
public person doesn't like to see on Wikipedia.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FLOSSK" group.
To post to this group, send email to free-softwar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to free-software-conf...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/free-software-conference?hl=en.
Then, WMF is the right place to ask for that.
I don't think so. Since when the laws of Serbia have jurisdiction over
Wikipedia articles?
If Wikimedia Serbia is affraid of being sued from anyone, retaliating
against content is not a good solution. IMO, you should ask help from
the parental organization.
And I'd like to hear what Wikimedia Serbia has to say about claims that
users of Wikipedia, editing content under its supposed jurisdiction,
have been harassed.
Cheers
Besnik

This is a bit complex issue and no Wikimedia organization is allowed
to have influence over the content, other than giving logistical
support to others to make content. Dispute resolution system is under
clear jurisdiction of the project itself. In this case, it's about
English Wikipedia structures. Thus, the right place for complaining
about all of those things is English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee
[1].
The same stays for Wikimedia Foundation, as well. It just maintains
and logistically supports projects. It doesn't have editorial
influence, other than "calling projects to do something", like it was
in the case of Biographies of living persons [2].
Laws of Serbia are not applied to any Wikipedia, including Serbian
Wikipedia, but it's applied on *all* inhabitants of Serbia (the same
issue is the case for Kosovo; thus, if you become in any way formally
connected to Wikimedia Foundation, you'll have to do the same as
Wikimedia Serbia). That means that any of us personally or Wikimedia
Serbia as organization could be prosecuted in Serbia. It is highly
unlikely that any of us would be prosecuted because of the political
position toward Kosovo, but it is likely that influence of WM RS over
the content could be used by persons not happy with the content of the
articles about them.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:ARBCOM
[2] http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Biographies_of_living_people
This in the sense of laws of Kosovo.
We have a bunch of serbs now on osm renaming everything to serbian cyrillic, this is crazy and useless.
So, in my new system you would allow people to document the serbian pov and names and display the articles in that POV, or you can show both or the albanian one. Each section that is under contest or conflict will be marked clearly as such. For things like names of places, the default view will be the current one on the ground and each name that is also contested will be clearly marked as such.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FLOSSK" group.
To post to this group, send email to free-softwar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to free-software-conf...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/free-software-conference?hl=en.
I could agree about that, but, as I said previously, that's against
NPOV and it won't pass any relevant body. You can try it on English
Wikipedia or you can try it on wikimedia-l mailing list (former
foundation-l), but you'll see that people will oppose that idea. That
means, that some other solution is needed in this case.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FLOSSK" group.
To post to this group, send email to free-softwar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to free-software-conf...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/free-software-conference?hl=en.
--