374:1

[Kerim Aydin]

In Peter Suber's original nomic rules, Rule 112 "The state of affairs that constitutes winning may not be altered from achieving n points to any other state of affairs" starts out in direct conflict with Rule 213, which adds another way to win to the state of affairs: "If the rules are changed so that further play is impossible, or if the legality of a move cannot be determined with finality, or if by the Judge's best reasoning, not overruled, a move appears equally legal and illegal, then the first player unable to complete a turn is the winner." 

Future rules will mention a conflict.

[John L]

Valid. 0.5 Style points. Seems like an in-depth awareness of the original ruleset.

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021, 6:58 PM Kerim Aydin <y.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

In Peter Suber's original nomic rules, Rule 112 "The state of affairs that constitutes winning may not be altered from achieving n points to any other state of affairs" starts out in direct conflict with Rule 213, which adds another way to win to the state of affairs: "If the rules are changed so that further play is impossible, or if the legality of a move cannot be determined with finality, or if by the Judge's best reasoning, not overruled, a move appears equally legal and illegal, then the first player unable to complete a turn is the winner." 

Future rules will mention a conflict.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fantasy Rules Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to frc-play+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/frc-play/CAHoZPO6XYSB%3DeikSsFtAPZkU42Qt%3DniBvANgiOnh%2BJazx7XkNw%40mail.gmail.com.

[David Nicol]

There is a great army of black stones.

There is a great army of white stones.

The generals of these two great armies viciously compete for points on the board.

All is conflict and chaos.

Future rules will identify two forces in opposition, such as black and white in go.

[John L]

Invalid. Did not notice or incorporate the rule from Telna. 

Coincidentally, this submission is an example of something that did not work as intended... So from a meta-analysis may be considered to follow the previous rule... But rather than support paradoxes, I will continue to consider this submission invalid.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fantasy Rules Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to frc-play+u...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/frc-play/CAFwScO_PM658aoy%2BM9r0nDKKCytjMY8K%3DYU4L9NjTRSvy8KB_Q%40mail.gmail.com.