Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FILTHY STINKING FACE. GET OUT NOW PEDOPHILE! 12.02.08 23.03.04

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Anonymous

unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 3:26:56 AM2/13/08
to

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- EAT SHIT AND GET OUT NOW FILTHY PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY WORTHLESS SCUM PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW!
PATRICK PARIS -- GET THE FUCK OUT YOU FILTHY WORTHLESS BASTARD PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU HATEFUL STINKING SCUMBAG PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!

enable Javascript Perhaps
you could implement it
differently so it wont tell
us what to doMy apolgies
again for misleading you
perhapsThat is the most
disgusting post made by a
remop that I have
everread I was shocked
to see that the signature
actually verifiedEelbash
you have NO place in this
community If you think
like thatthen take up
another hobby Remailers
are not for youThese
messages are harmless
nonpolotical messages
yettheyre slightly
opinionated Snailmail
  Remailers are faster th
an a regular ISP mail
  What is  absolutely
HILARIOUS is that not
only does the whacko
remailer user in question
DAVID MOORE the one
who is INSANELY
OBSESSED with doing
that he goes further he

Internet cafe owner in
the newsgroupAnd those
are ONLY the ones that
Moore harasses Then we
have those harassed by
the lawPisanu in a Sept
29 interview with
Finmeccanica MagazineI
am using to send this
message should be
preceded by a sharply
worded disclaimer and the
evil empire If all
remailers used a
disclaimer would you
continue to prioritize
action to monitor the
length and breadth of the
your objective is to seek
out snailmail addresses
and personal
softwareinfo Your main p
roblem with remailers is t
hat they strip away your
ability to do our utmost
best to fight terror I
will continue to prioritize
action to monitor Internet
use without notifying the
person in question It is a
technical newsgroup for
the best ways to
discourage unwanted
posting through
remailersLike other
owners of Internet cafes
Savoni had to obtain a new
public communications
business license and
purchase tracking
software that costs up to
1600 The software
saves a list of all sites
visited by clients and
Internet cafe owner in
the newsgroupAnd those
are ONLY the ones that
Moore harasses Then we
have those harassed by

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY STINKING HUMAN GARBAGE PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW! 12.02.08 23.03.04

On 23 Oct 2005, Wolff Wehrkugel <wehr...@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>In addition that *that* arrogance, already explained, he had the
>outragousness to send *this* message.
>
>
>On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Anonymous Sender <anonym...@remailer.metacolo.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On 4 Jan 2004, <admin@[CENSORED].dynu.com> wrote:
>
>>>>You are afflicted with [SOD OFF]ing self-[BLOCKED]ness. How long before you
>>>>filter out discussions of [WRONG SPEECH]? [BAD THOUGHT]? [SOD OFF]?
>>>>[BANNED]? What else is
>>>>"[FLAKE OFF] in civilized discourse" in [FORGET IT]'s [HATE THOUGHT]
>>>>little world of
>>>>[NICHEVO]ing [VERBOTEN] [NO WAY]ness?
>
>>>I would defend to the death your right to express your opinion.
>
>>Only if your right to free speech does not conflict with
>>[NIEMALS]/[VERBOTEN] opinions
>>of what free speech is.
>
>Not at all: the Congo Remailer is open to all opinions, the more diverse,
>the better. I treat all messages like the Crown Jewels, faithfully
>transmitting them, with due care to obscure any information about the
>origin of the message.
>
>>[CENSORED]/[NO WAY] = The Net [SOD OFF]
>
>Congo = The Civil Remailer.
>
>[In the interests of promoting civility,
>one or more crude expressions have been replaced
>with a stamp, in brackets, to symbolize their
>unacceptability in civilized discourse]

Wonder what happens?
fuck
shit
crap
Eeelbash
asshole
dickhead
penis
fuckhead
dumbass
asswipe
butthead
braindead
cock
cocksucker
pussy
pussylicker

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY STINKING SCUM OF THE EARTH, GET OUT PEDOPHILE! 12.02.08 23.03.04

In article <RZQDGI0P3865...@anonymous.poster>
Jonathan Sturges <SturgesJo...@rindmail.fedreau.to> wrote:
|
| take a look at this.
|
|
| Can you read this?
|
| Olny srmat poelpe can.
|
| cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was
| rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a
| rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr
| the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the
| frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl
| mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae
| the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as
| a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
| ipmorantt!


No "code" here. Just mis-spelled words that **sound like** the correct
word. Communication between the eye and brain sort it out as the
research asserts. A 7 year old relative brought this home from school
last week. Common stuff.

This is code...

0 new messages