THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED REMAILER OPERATOR
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
PATRICK PARIS -- INTERNET FLOODING COCKSUCKER
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
In <435a4e57$0$11067$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl>, nos...@hccnet.nl wrote:
>=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
>Signature: 0x225CA009 Thomas J. Boschloo <bosc...@multiweb.nl>
>Date: Sat Oct 22 09:37:46 2005
>Status: OK (Invalid)
>
>Twisty Admin wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:43:27 +0200, "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl>
>> wrote:
>
>>>He really was a netcop and not a remop IMNSHO (even though they rhyme).
>>>I am SOOO glad he is gone. Really glad. I can't express how much more I
>>>am able to enjoy APA-S now.. Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too
>>>and this will be paradise for me!
>>>
>>>Kind Regards,
>>>Thomas
>>
>>
>> Thanks for not including me my dear old friend. :)
>
>So you have plans to travel the same path Frog-Admin and Eelbash do/did? ;-)
You're always welcome to make a VERY spectacular fool of yourself attempting to
guess something like that from a usenet post. And flaunt the fact that you're so
stupid you havent even noticed the risk in doing that.
>Thomas
>--
>Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR
>=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
<<==========>>
Subject: skniletS E deirF
mI5 lOVESASH eELB
Eelbasher
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Remailer admin revealing personal info about users?
"Thrasher Remailer" <thra...@reece.net.au> wrote in message
news:7AWQCHMC3865...@reece.net.au...
> The following was posted on the fl.general group. Isn't this an ethical
> violation for a remailer admin to be revealing this information?
>
> I say we boycott Eelbash. This seems to be very dishonest.
>
>>The harasser trace to a domain at XXXXXXXXXX.com. He sends one of
>>his spams and used my remailer as both the first and last in the chain.
>>The PGP key verifies to a XXXXXXXXXXXX at that domain.
>>
>>Abuse is not permitted through eelbash.
>>
>>
>>Cheers!
>>
>>Eelbash admin
WHAT BULLSHIT DEPARTMENT
=============================================================
Path:
nwrddc01.gnilink.net!cyclone2.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!
news.glorb.com!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news
Date: 3 Nov 2005 00:06:21 -0000
Message-ID: <UK706EHJ3865...@reece.net.au>
From: eelbash <thra...@reece.net.au>
Subject: THE HARASSER OF YOUR NEWSGROUP CAUGHT
Newsgroups: fl.general
X-No-Archive: yes
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator... <thrashe...@reece.net.au>
X-Remailer-Contact: thrashe...@reece.net.au
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Xref: news.verizon.net fl.general:29752
X-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 19:09:20 EST (nwrddc01.gnilink.net)
The harasser trace to a domain at chicagomedialab.com. He sends one of his
spams and used my remailer as both the first and last in the chain. The
PGP key verifies to a Darrell Moore at that domain.
Abuse is not permitted through eelbash.
Cheers!
Eelbash admin
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++==
fakes
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- SUCKED ONE SUCKED 'EM ALL
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
rema...@twistycreek.com wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Anonymous <anon...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <43597cbd$0$11078$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl>
>>"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>>
>>>Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too and this will be paradise for me!
>>
>>Eelbash must not retire! He is the single most entertaining person in
>>here although he doesn't intend to be.
>>
>>I read apas once a week and get great amusement out of reading
>>Eelbash's silly ideas for censoring (sorry I mean "stopping the
>>psychos"). I also enjoy reading his sock puppets where he tries to
>>pretend he's someone else that just happens to think and talk exactly
>>like him.
>>
>>He is my internet soap opera. Eelbash must stay.
>
>
> Wonderful entertainment that bloke.
I don't think it is so wonderful. He is a PR danger to *all* remailers.
(and he knows it too)
Thomas
- --
Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Teddybor - new remailer?
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Tarapia Tapioco <comes...@ntani.firenze.linux.it>
wrote:
>What's the story with this remailer:
>
>$remailer{"teddybor"} = "<mixm...@teddyb.org> mix remix
>inflt50 rhop5 post";
Seems like a solid re-mailer. Entry and exit. Good stats and pretty quick.
Glad to have him.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:22:46 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <ad...@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>>
>>On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:30:05 +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>
>>Some very angry and disturbed tripe, below.
>>
>>
>>>>The Eelbash remailer is a last-hop remailer.
>>>
>>>>It provides full FROM headers.
>>>
>>>>Disclaimers are put into newsgroups as needed.
>>> Oh great, tampering with mail again. Fuck you.
>>>
>>>>If all else fails, the newsgroup will be temporarily blocked.
>>> How the hell are we supposed to know if they are blocked?
>>
>>I'll let you know here.
>>
>>
>>>>The Eelbash remailer allows PLAIN TEXT messages only.
>>> All the easier for you to read them. You perverted fucking asshole.
>>
>>Don't talk nonsense; all it means is that html is not allowed, and
>>binaries are not allowed.
>
> Eelbash, you are a liar. LIAR.
I misspoke: the remailer will not accept html or binaries, such as .exe
files; it does accept encrypted messages at last hop, as any remailer does.
It also accepts non-pgp-encrypted messages - plain text messages in the
standard form:
::
anon-post-to: some.newsgroup
##
subject: some subject
from: some name
etc.
etc.
By the way, a quick look at capstrings shows that bigapple, george,
hastio, metacolo, panta, senshi, and vger also accept plain text messages.
>
> What it actually means is that messages do not have to be encrypted to be
> accepted.
Correct.
> HTML and binaries ARE accepted, if they are encrypted.
You are talking gibberish. If a message is encrypted, it is not possible
to know if it is html, or a binary, such as a .exe.
>
> Either you are a liar, or so truly incompetent that you honestly don't
> know what PLAIN TEXT accepted actually means. So which is it? Huge liar,
> or painfully incompetent?
Neither. Just an average lover of privacy trying to provide some to other
people, and looking in wonderment at the psychopaths, such as yourself,
that infest this newsgroup.
Again, I urge you to get help. You do not realize how sick you are, though
I am sure everyone else in your neighborhood does.
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>>Flood filters are in place.
>>> In-Out-In. Make up your fucking mind.
>>
>>Although I have the highest respect for Twisty's corporate legal counsel,
>>I have more respect for somebody like Zax, who said yesterday that he has
>>flood filters in his remailer and even added some more.
>>
>>That's why I put the filters back in.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> You are not a remailer, you are a psycho. Get the fuck out already.
>>>
>>> Pingers, please remove Eelbash from your lists. He has violated every
>>> rule in the book. Eelbash cannot be considered a remailer.
>>>
>>> Remops, please block this asshole. You may be depriving someone of
>>> their right to privacy. He only allows plain text messages for his
>>> perverted viewing pleasure.
>>
>>You are a sick young fellow (or girl); get help.
>>
>>A copy of this post is at
>>http://eelbash.yi.org:81/miscx/post/20051108002.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>>iD8DBQFDcOeBYyZq98cTxEkRAlbVAJ4zf4LfqeCqCacEfrJ95WW6tV7fzQCggybj
>>bkg9Tw2U3eKm4SIg3btutN8=
>>=mKXC
>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
A copy of this post is at http://eelbash.yi.org:81/miscx/post/20061108003.
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- PEDOPHILE
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
Twisty Admin <admin^@^twistycreek^.^com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:37:46 +0200, "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl>
Margen reads the state/transition file and creates a state/transition file. This
file contains information about how it in no way intended to be named.
> wrote:
>
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> >Twisty Admin wrote:
He is the idea, to get a feel for the record, I did not send that and have changed
the remailer system, or with usenet distribution? I find it hard to believe that
somebody's trying to help curb abuses.
> >> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:43:27 +0200, "Thomas J. Boschloo"
> >> <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> >
> >>>He really was a netcop and not a remop IMNSHO (even though they rhyme).
> >>>I am SOOO glad he is gone. Really glad. I can't express how much more I
> >>>am able to enjoy APA-S now.. Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too
> >>>and this will be paradise for me!
> >>>
> >>>Kind Regards,
> >>>Thomas
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for not including me my dear old friend. :)
> >
> >So you have plans to travel the same path Frog-Admin and Eelbash do/did?
> >;-)
> >
> >Thomas
>
> Absolutely not ;-( Yuuuuch!!!!
>
> Send me an E-mail smetime to chat. I am here in the US and I have never
> been to your country. I would like to hear what life is like there. If I
> can't see it, I would love to here about it.
>
> Warm Regards to You,
> Twisty Admin
>
>
Fl.general is one of those rumors. Yes.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQA/AwUBQ1pqoo/zWl6iiTz4EQKWWQCgn8/6E14ZT7SWvh2LgV5kvQ43LHwAniqB
> mqcWGo4SOZIWNvuxhqpHXuWO
> =B0hI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: What Did He Do?
Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
Hmm, a new pattern has emerged. Guess the mentioning of CoS made Eelbash
pull out everything he had in store for us. Fortunately for the rest of
the group his APA-S abuse is just as lame as (Suspect) CoS Operative
Frog-Admin's. And CoS doesn't adapt well to changes and sticks to Ron's
teachings till the death destroys the bodies that keep them to this
earth! And having to start all over again with the tedious process or
freeing themselves from those ugly Thetans
Try again Eelbash! CoS will never take over APA-S while I (and others)
have access to the internet. No matter how hard you try. You can never win!
Regs,
Special Xenu Agent, uhm, Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Twistycreek re-mailer open to public
In article <VWLMVXIN3864...@anonymous.sender>
Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (Twisty_admin) wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2005, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
> >In article <WDQJYD4H38640.4142939815@anonymous.poster>
> >Wolff Wehrkugel <wehr...@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:40:03 +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <MIOP4P1V3864...@anonymous.sender>
> >> > Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (Admin_rbtor) wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> >> Hash: SHA1
> >> >>
> >> >> Send to rema...@twistycreek.com
> >> >> with subject:
> >> >>
> >> >> remailer-key
> >> >> remailer-config
> >> >> remailer-adminkey
> >> >> dest-block
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > Great to see you back!
> >>
> >> Me too, but I hope your remailer will not be as up and down as Eelbash has
> >> been.
> >
> >I doubt it. He was reliable, just had ISP problems.
>
> No doubt about the ISP problems :) They were very nice about it though.
>
> I had to sign up for a 2 year commercial account. To get the fixed IP was
> additional. Now it is somewhere close to a $100 a month. I registered a new
> domain name at Network Solutions with the privacy option.
>
> The benefit is speed. At bandwidthplace.com/speedtest it comes up with
> between 6.4 and 7.0 megabits per second. Much more than I'll ever need.
>
> I have been consistantly pinged by BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG from ANONYMOUS and
> mail.brianbinder.com. A tad annoying when mine is a static commercial
> account.
>
> Odd that they could ping me from 10.1.10.1 which is the same address as my
> new modem/router. They also tried to connect to port 137.
>
> I had to use the internal firewall to block all the connections they use.
> Now I can't access my modem/router from this PC. A never ending battle. :)
I thought you had a static IP now, not some 10.x.x.x crap? Or is
the static IP on the WAN side of the router? If so, no 10.x.x.x
traffic should be coming in to your network (the router should
be able to stop it and the ISP shouldn't be routing it to you in
the first place).
Anyway, block ports 135-139 and 445 at the router. All virus
stuff.