Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

RELATIVITY AS INCONSISTENCY

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Pentcho Valev

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 6:39:57 AM7/2/09
to
http://labnews.co.uk/laboratory_article.php/4514/2/2/attack-on-great-pillar-of-physics
"Precisely because Einstein's theory is inconsistent, its supporters
have drawn on contradictory principles in a way that greatly expanded
their apparent ability to explain the universe. Most crazes die out
when it becomes obvious that they were overblown. The amazing thing
about Einstein's theory of relativity is that it has kept going. It is
built on contradictions, but these very contradictions means that
almost anything 'proves' that it is right. It is a bit like a theory
where you say 1 + 1 = 2, but also that 1+ 1 = 3."

Pentcho Valev
pva...@yahoo.com

Juan R.

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 7:00:22 AM7/2/09
to
Pentcho Valev wrote on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:39:57 -0700:

> http://labnews.co.uk/laboratory_article.php/4514/2/2/attack-on-great-


pillar-of-physics
> "Precisely because Einstein's theory is inconsistent, its supporters
> have drawn on contradictory principles in a way that greatly expanded
> their apparent ability to explain the universe. Most crazes die out when
> it becomes obvious that they were overblown. The amazing thing about
> Einstein's theory of relativity is that it has kept going. It is built
> on contradictions, but these very contradictions means that almost
> anything 'proves' that it is right. It is a bit like a theory where you
> say 1 + 1 = 2, but also that 1+ 1 = 3."
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com

From the news:

"Perhaps tellingly Dr Peter Hayes is senior lecturer in politics - not
physics. In his latest paper he argues that Albert Einstein's theory of
relativity - perhaps the most famous scientific theory in history -
should be viewed as an ideology, not as a science. He argues that its
impact on popular culture and science has been so influential precisely
because as a scientific theory it doesn't actually make sense."

--
http://www.canonicalscience.org/

Whoever

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 7:33:54 AM7/2/09
to
"Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7f709a90-b8c3-427d...@18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

It is not, so rest of post is irrelevant

Eric Gisse

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 7:49:16 AM7/2/09
to
On Jul 2, 2:39 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://labnews.co.uk/laboratory_article.php/4514/2/2/attack-on-great-...

> "Precisely because Einstein's theory is inconsistent, its supporters
> have drawn on contradictory principles in a way that greatly expanded
> their apparent ability to explain the universe. Most crazes die out
> when it becomes obvious that they were overblown. The amazing thing
> about Einstein's theory of relativity is that it has kept going. It is
> built on contradictions, but these very contradictions means that
> almost anything 'proves' that it is right. It is a bit like a theory
> where you say 1 + 1 = 2, but also that 1+ 1 = 3."
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com

Are you really going to spend the rest of your days doing this?

Ahmed Ouahi, Architect

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 10:29:33 AM7/2/09
to

Should be anything the army touches a dead
Simply is the army goal along anything dead

--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!


"Juan R. Gonz�lez-�lvarez" <juanR...@canonicalscience.com> kirjoitti
viestiss�:pan.2009.07...@canonicalscience.com...

Ahmed Ouahi, Architect

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 10:37:00 AM7/2/09
to
Should be anything the army touches a dead
Simply is the army goal along anything dead

--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Bonjour!


"Juan R. Gonz�lez-�lvarez" <juanR...@canonicalscience.com> kirjoitti
viestiss�:pan.2009.07...@canonicalscience.com...

Uncle Al

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 10:48:26 AM7/2/09
to
Pentcho Valev wrote:
[snip crap]

> "Precisely because Einstein's theory is inconsistent,

[snip rest of crap]

idiot

<http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/tests.html>
Mathematics of gravitation

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0103044
http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0307140
GR structure, especially Part 4/p. 7

http://cc3d.free.fr/Relativity/Relat1.html
Special Relativity for yard apes

<http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html>
Experimental constraints on Special Relativity

Science 323(5919) 1327 (2009)
Double pulsar J0737-3039A/B is within 0.05% of GR model

<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2006-3/>
<http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/9148/title/Einstein_Unruffled_Relativity_passes_stringent_new_tests>
<http://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
http://ianparker.g3z.com/Relativity/
Experimental constraints on General Relativity

idiot

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Uncle Al

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 10:50:00 AM7/2/09
to
Pentcho Valev wrote:
[snip crap]

> "Precisely because Einstein's theory is inconsistent,

Uncle Al

unread,
Jul 2, 2009, 10:51:18 AM7/2/09
to
Pentcho Valev wrote:
[snip crap]

> "Precisely because Einstein's theory is inconsistent,

0 new messages