info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Why Modern Physics Is an Elaborate Farce
4 views
Skip to first unread message
pentch...@gmail.com
May 27, 2022, 6:47:51 PM5/27/22
to
Postulate in Big Brother’s world: 2 + 2 = 5
Consequence: 3(2 + 2) = 3x5 = 15
On the other hand: 3(2 + 2) = 3x2 + 3x2 = 12
The paradox shows how exciting and revolutionary Big Brother’s science is.
Postulate in Albert Einstein’s world: The speed of light is constant.
Consequence: If two clocks are in relative motion, either clock runs slower than the other as judged from the other clock’s system.
The paradox shows how exciting and revolutionary Albert Einstein’s science is.
Bryan Wallace: "Einstein's special relativity theory with his second postulate that the speed of light in space is constant is the linchpin that holds the whole range of modern physics theories together. Shatter this postulate, and modern physics becomes an elaborate farce!"
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
Consequence: 3(2 + 2) = 3x5 = 15
On the other hand: 3(2 + 2) = 3x2 + 3x2 = 12
The paradox shows how exciting and revolutionary Big Brother’s science is.
Postulate in Albert Einstein’s world: The speed of light is constant.
Consequence: If two clocks are in relative motion, either clock runs slower than the other as judged from the other clock’s system.
The paradox shows how exciting and revolutionary Albert Einstein’s science is.
Bryan Wallace: "Einstein's special relativity theory with his second postulate that the speed of light in space is constant is the linchpin that holds the whole range of modern physics theories together. Shatter this postulate, and modern physics becomes an elaborate farce!"
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
François Guillet
May 28, 2022, 8:19:07 AM5/28/22
to
pentch...@gmail.com a couché sur son écran :
...
elaborate farce!"
Show us an experiment of information transmission at speed v>c, and we
can believe you.
...
> Bryan Wallace: "Einstein's special relativity theory with his second
> postulate that the speed of light in space is constant is the linchpin that
> holds the whole range of modern physics theories together. Shatter this
> postulate, and modern physics becomes an elaborate farce!"
Translation : "Shatter the facts, and modern physics becomes an
> postulate that the speed of light in space is constant is the linchpin that
> holds the whole range of modern physics theories together. Shatter this
> postulate, and modern physics becomes an elaborate farce!"
elaborate farce!"
Show us an experiment of information transmission at speed v>c, and we
can believe you.
pentch...@gmail.com
May 29, 2022, 4:27:44 PM5/29/22
to
The observer starts moving towards the light source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE
Two obvious facts in this particular scenario:
(A) The speed and the frequency of the light pulses vary proportionally for the observer.
(B) The wavelength (distance between light pulses) remains constant.
The fact (B) remains true in ANY scenario (moving emitter, moving observer, presence or absence of gravity) and will become the fundamental axiom of future, Einstein-free physics (if the death of physics is not irreversible):
The wavelength of light is constant (for a given emitter).
Important corollaries:
Corollary 1: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift.
Corollary 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v, as per Newton's theory.
Corollary 3: Spacetime and gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist. LIGO's "discoveries" are fake.
Corollary 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation: Einstein's general relativity is an absurdity.
Corollary 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is not expanding.
More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE
Two obvious facts in this particular scenario:
(A) The speed and the frequency of the light pulses vary proportionally for the observer.
(B) The wavelength (distance between light pulses) remains constant.
The fact (B) remains true in ANY scenario (moving emitter, moving observer, presence or absence of gravity) and will become the fundamental axiom of future, Einstein-free physics (if the death of physics is not irreversible):
The wavelength of light is constant (for a given emitter).
Important corollaries:
Corollary 1: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift.
Corollary 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v, as per Newton's theory.
Corollary 3: Spacetime and gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist. LIGO's "discoveries" are fake.
Corollary 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation: Einstein's general relativity is an absurdity.
Corollary 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is not expanding.
More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
Richard Hachel
May 31, 2022, 12:10:35 PM5/31/22
to
d'être à l'écoute des autres hommes.
Citez moi un seul homme capable de dire à un autre : "Eh bien assieds-toi
là mon ami, et discutons de ta thèse".
Ca n'existe pas.
C'est ce qui rend POSSIBLE la persistance de certaines incompréhensions
physiques.
Par exemple cet homme qui dit qu'on peut aller plus vite que c, et cet
autre qui dit que non.
Pourtant, les deux ont raison.
C'est ça qui est dramatique.
J'ai expliqué cent fois, mille fois, pourquoi les deux ont raison.
Tout le monde s'en fout.
C'est ça qu'on appelle l'arrogance scientifique. Celui qui ne pense pas
comme nous est un troll. Celui qui ne prie pas comme nous est un
hérétique. Celui qui ne vote pas comme nous est un terroriste.
On a beau demander un peu de mesure.
Rien n'y fait.
R.H.
0 new messages