Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Fundamental Fraud of Thermodynamics

3 views
Skip to first unread message

pentch...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 11, 2022, 4:43:02 PM1/11/22
to
A 200 years old fraud on which the whole of thermodynamics is predicated:

"A NECESSARY component of a heat engine...is that two temperatures are involved" http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/py105/Heatengines.html

"Two temperatures" are by no means "necessary". Isothermal (one-temperature) heat engines are commonplace - e.g. pH-sensitive polymers can do work, at the expense of ambient heat, as they swell or contract. No "two temperatures" involved:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul-Topham/publication/47426820/figure/fig1/AS:307404580376582@1450302371395/Illustration-of-a-volume-transition-in-a-cross-linked-polybase-network-triggered-by-a-pH.png

By adding and removing hydrogen ions (H+) one can cyclically extract work from pH-sensitive polymers - see Fig. 4 on p. 15 here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1367611/pdf/biophysj00645-0017.pdf

Adding and removing H+, per se, consumes no work if done QUASISTATICALLY. This means that the work lost e.g. in adding is compensated by the work gained in removing, and the net work involved is zero. So lifting weights is the net work in the whole process. The second law of thermodynamics is clearly violated.

See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
0 new messages