info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Stephen Hawking Teaches Variable Wavelength of Light
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Pentcho Valev
Aug 16, 2022, 5:09:57 PM8/16/22
to
Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: "Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When the source emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary." http://www.fisica.net/relatividade/stephen_hawking_a_brief_history_of_time.pdf
Hawking is not alone - all physicists believe that the wavelength of light varies with the speed of the emitter. Here is an animation: https://youtu.be/3mJTRXCMU6o?t=77
Variable wavelength of light contradicts the principle of relativity. If the wavelength varied, the emitter could regularly measure the (varying) wavelength inside his spaceship - so he would know his speed without looking outside. If, for instance, measurements inside the spaceship show that the wavelength has decreased, the emitter will conclude that his spaceship is now moving faster than before.
The wavelength of light is invariable. This fact will become fundamental axiom in future, Einstein-free physics.
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
Hawking is not alone - all physicists believe that the wavelength of light varies with the speed of the emitter. Here is an animation: https://youtu.be/3mJTRXCMU6o?t=77
Variable wavelength of light contradicts the principle of relativity. If the wavelength varied, the emitter could regularly measure the (varying) wavelength inside his spaceship - so he would know his speed without looking outside. If, for instance, measurements inside the spaceship show that the wavelength has decreased, the emitter will conclude that his spaceship is now moving faster than before.
The wavelength of light is invariable. This fact will become fundamental axiom in future, Einstein-free physics.
See more here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
Pentcho Valev
Aug 17, 2022, 6:48:39 AM8/17/22
to
The formula
(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)
can be combined with two axioms:
Axiom 1: The speed of light is invariable (Einstein 1905).
Axiom 2: The wavelength of light is invariable.
Axiom 1 killed physics.
Axiom 2 will resurrect it (if it's not too late). Important corollaries:
Corollary 1: Any frequency shift is caused by a proportional speed-of-light shift.
Corollary 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v, as per Newton's theory.
Corollary 3: Spacetime and gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist. LIGO's "discoveries" are fakes.
Corollary 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation.
Corollary 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is not expanding.
More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)
can be combined with two axioms:
Axiom 1: The speed of light is invariable (Einstein 1905).
Axiom 2: The wavelength of light is invariable.
Axiom 1 killed physics.
Axiom 2 will resurrect it (if it's not too late). Important corollaries:
Corollary 1: Any frequency shift is caused by a proportional speed-of-light shift.
Corollary 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v, as per Newton's theory.
Corollary 3: Spacetime and gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist. LIGO's "discoveries" are fakes.
Corollary 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation.
Corollary 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is not expanding.
More here: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
0 new messages