info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Einstein's Two Original Sins
7 views
Skip to first unread message
Pentcho Valev
May 19, 2023, 6:40:02 AM5/19/23
to
In 1905 Einstein committed two fraudulent acts that changed the course of physics and eventually converted this branch of science into an insane but all-powerful ideology:
1. Einstein postulated constant speed of light, knowing that the speed of light is variable.
2. Einstein replaced the valid deduction from his 1905 postulates
Either clock is slow as judged from the other clock's reference frame.
with the non sequitur
Moving clock is slow, stationary clock is fast:
Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905: "From this there ensues the following peculiar consequence. If at the points A and B of K there are stationary clocks which, viewed in the stationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B by tv^2/2c^2 (up to magnitudes of fourth and higher order), t being the time occupied in the journey from A to B." http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
The non sequitur "moving clock is slow, stationary clock is fast" is universally taught by Einstein's ideologues:
https://youtu.be/Q1y3YnPgaY4?t=1157
Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
1. Einstein postulated constant speed of light, knowing that the speed of light is variable.
2. Einstein replaced the valid deduction from his 1905 postulates
Either clock is slow as judged from the other clock's reference frame.
with the non sequitur
Moving clock is slow, stationary clock is fast:
Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905: "From this there ensues the following peculiar consequence. If at the points A and B of K there are stationary clocks which, viewed in the stationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B by tv^2/2c^2 (up to magnitudes of fourth and higher order), t being the time occupied in the journey from A to B." http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
The non sequitur "moving clock is slow, stationary clock is fast" is universally taught by Einstein's ideologues:
https://youtu.be/Q1y3YnPgaY4?t=1157
Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev
May 19, 2023, 3:25:42 PM5/19/23
to
The second sin in more detail:
Einstein's 1905 postulates, true or false, entail:
(A) Either clock runs slower than the other as judged from the other clock's reference frame.
Einstein ignored the valid deduction (A) and fraudulently stated that the postulates entail:
(B) The moving clock runs slow, the stationary one runs fast.
Why did Einstein replace the valid deduction (A) with the non sequitur (B)? Because (A) does not predict anything while (B) predicts time travel into the future - the miracle (idiocy) that converted Einstein into a deity:
Thibault Damour: "The paradigm of the special relativistic upheaval of the usual concept of time is the twin paradox. Let us emphasize that this striking example of time dilation proves that time travel (towards the future) is possible. As a gedanken experiment (if we neglect practicalities such as the technology needed for reaching velocities comparable to the velocity of light, the cost of the fuel and the capacity of the traveller to sustain high accelerations), it shows that a sentient being can jump, "within a minute" (of his experienced time) arbitrarily far in the future, say sixty million years ahead, and see, and be part of, what (will) happen then on Earth. This is a clear way of realizing that the future "already exists" (as we can experience it "in a minute")." http://www.bourbaphy.fr/damourtemps.pdf
Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Einstein's 1905 postulates, true or false, entail:
(A) Either clock runs slower than the other as judged from the other clock's reference frame.
Einstein ignored the valid deduction (A) and fraudulently stated that the postulates entail:
(B) The moving clock runs slow, the stationary one runs fast.
Why did Einstein replace the valid deduction (A) with the non sequitur (B)? Because (A) does not predict anything while (B) predicts time travel into the future - the miracle (idiocy) that converted Einstein into a deity:
Thibault Damour: "The paradigm of the special relativistic upheaval of the usual concept of time is the twin paradox. Let us emphasize that this striking example of time dilation proves that time travel (towards the future) is possible. As a gedanken experiment (if we neglect practicalities such as the technology needed for reaching velocities comparable to the velocity of light, the cost of the fuel and the capacity of the traveller to sustain high accelerations), it shows that a sentient being can jump, "within a minute" (of his experienced time) arbitrarily far in the future, say sixty million years ahead, and see, and be part of, what (will) happen then on Earth. This is a clear way of realizing that the future "already exists" (as we can experience it "in a minute")." http://www.bourbaphy.fr/damourtemps.pdf
Pentcho Valev https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
0 new messages