Einsteinians unwittingly disprove general relativity:
Albert Einstein Institute: "...you do not need general relativity to derive the correct prediction for the gravitational redshift. A combination of Newtonian gravity, a particle theory of light, and the weak equivalence principle (gravitating mass equals inertial mass) suffices. [...] The gravitational redshift was first measured on earth in 1960-65 by Pound, Rebka, and Snider..."
http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/redshift_white_dwarfs.html
Banesh Hoffmann (p. 139): "The gravitational red shift does not arise from changes in the intrinsic rates of clocks. It arises from what befalls light signals as they traverse space and time in the presence of gravitation."
http://www.amazon.com/Relativity-Its-Roots-Banesh-Hoffmann/dp/0486406768
James Hartle, Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity, p. 113: "If we accept the equivalence principle, we must also accept that light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as material bodies."
https://www.amazon.com/Gravity-Introduction-Einsteins-General-Relativity/dp/0805386629
Paul A. Tipler, Ralph A. Llewellyn, Modern Physics: "A beam of light will accelerate in a gravitational field as do objects with rest mass. For example, near the surface of Earth light will fall with acceleration 9.8 m/s^2."
http://web.pdx.edu/~pmoeck/books/Tipler_Llewellyn.pdf
More here:
https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev
Pentcho Valev