Dead Physics Means Dying Civilization

Skip to first unread message

Aug 11, 2021, 6:50:08 PMAug 11
"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels."

"If there's one thing every schoolboy knows about Einstein and his theory of relativity, it is that the speed of light in vacuum is constant. No matter what the circumstances, light in vacuum travels at the same speed... The speed of light is the very keystone of physics, the seemingly sure foundation upon which every modern cosmological theory is built, the yardstick by which everything in the universe is measured. [...] The only aspect of the universe that didn't change was the speed of light. And ever since, the constancy of the speed of light has been woven into the very fabric of physics, into the way physics equations are written, even into the notation used. Nowadays, to "vary" the speed of light is not even a swear word: It is simply not present in the vocabulary of physics."

These texts suggest that, if the speed of light is variable (it is!), physics, based on Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light axiom, is long dead (exists in a zombie state).

Dead physics means dying civilization. Are you killing the civilization, theoretical physicists?

See more here:

Pentcho Valev

Aug 12, 2021, 5:43:31 AMAug 12
"...and he showed that the speed of light within a vacuum is the same no matter the speed at which an observer travels."

Before "showing" this nonsense, Einstein wrestled with his conscience over a lengthy period of time, to the point of despair:

John Stachel: "But this seems to be nonsense. How can it happen that the speed of light relative to an observer cannot be increased or decreased if that observer moves towards or away from a light beam? Einstein states that he wrestled with this problem over a lengthy period of time, to the point of despair."

"Seems to be nonsense" is a red herring. Einstein's constant speed of light is OBVIOUS NONSENSE. Frequency and speed of light pulses vary proportionally for the moving observer, in accordance with the formula

(frequency) = (speed of pulses)/(distance between pulses)

More here:

Pentcho Valev
Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages