PATRICK PARIS -- GET OUT YOU STINKING FATHERLESS PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE! 04.02.08 14.03.05
Non scrivetemi
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING, GET THE FUCK OUT NOW YOU STINKING PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE GET OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PIECE OF PIG SHIT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- GET THE FUCK OUT YOU STINKING SYPHILITIC PERVERT PEDOPHILE!
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <ad...@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>
>On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:30:05 +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
>Some very angry and disturbed tripe, below.
>
>
>>>The Eelbash remailer is a last-hop remailer.
>>
>>>It provides full FROM headers.
>>
>>>Disclaimers are put into newsgroups as needed.
>> Oh great, tampering with mail again. Fuck you.
>>
>>>If all else fails, the newsgroup will be temporarily blocked.
>> How the hell are we supposed to know if they are blocked?
>
>I'll let you know here.
>
>>
>>>The Eelbash remailer allows PLAIN TEXT messages only.
>> All the easier for you to read them. You perverted fucking asshole.
>
>Don't talk nonsense; all it means is that html is not allowed, and
>binaries are not allowed.
Eelbash, you are a liar. LIAR.
What it actually means is that messages do not have to be encrypted to be
accepted. HTML and binaries ARE accepted, if they are encrypted.
Either you are a liar, or so truly incompetent that you honestly don't know
what PLAIN TEXT accepted actually means. So which is it? Huge liar, or
painfully incompetent?
>
>>
>>>Flood filters are in place.
>> In-Out-In. Make up your fucking mind.
>
>Although I have the highest respect for Twisty's corporate legal counsel,
>I have more respect for somebody like Zax, who said yesterday that he has
>flood filters in his remailer and even added some more.
>
>That's why I put the filters back in.
>
>>
>>
>> You are not a remailer, you are a psycho. Get the fuck out already.
>>
>> Pingers, please remove Eelbash from your lists. He has violated every rule
>> in the book. Eelbash cannot be considered a remailer.
>>
>> Remops, please block this asshole. You may be depriving someone of their
>> right to privacy. He only allows plain text messages for his perverted
>> viewing pleasure.
>
>You are a sick young fellow (or girl); get help.
>
>A copy of this post is at http://eelbash.yi.org:81/miscx/post/20051108002.
>
>
>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iD8DBQFDcOeBYyZq98cTxEkRAlbVAJ4zf4LfqeCqCacEfrJ95WW6tV7fzQCggybj
>bkg9Tw2U3eKm4SIg3btutN8=
>=mKXC
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY PERVERT PEDOPHILE GET OUT! 04.02.08 14.03.05
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Oct 2005 16:23:00 -0000, Thrasher Remailer <thra...@reece.net.au>
wrote:
>In article <OCI0NH5J3864...@anonymous.sender>
>Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (Twisty_admin) wrote:
>
>> >> I have been consistantly pinged by BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG from
>> >> ANONYMOUS and mail.brianbinder.com. A tad annoying when mine is a
>> >> static commercial account.
>> >>
>> >> Odd that they could ping me from 10.1.10.1 which is the same address
>> >> as my new modem/router. They also tried to connect to port 137.
>> >>
>> >> I had to use the internal firewall to block all the connections they
>> >> use. Now I can't access my modem/router from this PC. A never ending
>> >> battle. :)
>> >
>> >I thought you had a static IP now, not some 10.x.x.x crap? Or is
>> >the static IP on the WAN side of the router? If so, no 10.x.x.x
>> >traffic should be coming in to your network (the router should
>> >be able to stop it and the ISP shouldn't be routing it to you in
>> >the first place).
>> >
>> >Anyway, block ports 135-139 and 445 at the router. All virus
>> >stuff.
>>
>> I have everything blocked except port 25 which is forwarded.
>>
>> I have a static IP. The new modem is a combination modem/router. You are
>> correct, the static IP is on the WAN side. I have 4 other computers
>> connected to it. 1 laptop by wireless so I have a wireless router
>> plugged in to one of the ports. The 3 others are direct connected to the
>> router. The re-mailer has a fixed IP while I let the other 2 receive
>> their addesses by DHCP. The wireless laptop receives a 192.168.0.2
>> address from the
>> wireless router. The others all have 10.1.10.xxx IPs.
>>
>> To access the router, I have to type in 10.1.10.1 which brings up the
>> login page for the router. The re-mailer PC is at a fixed IP of
>> 10.1.10.xxx. (in case they read this, they'll have to guess what xxx
>> is) The router itself has a built in firewall which I enabled. Then each
>> computer has a McAffee virus/securitycenter/firewall combination on it.
>>
>> The only one that gets pinged is this one, the re-mailer. Things slowed
>> down since I blocked everything including the router. I am surprised it
>> still works at all.
>>
>> I just don't know how I can get pinged or whatever from the same address
>> as my router. I thought a real Domain IP should show up. Again, I am far
>> from the expert so would really like to know how this can be done. Seems
>> pretty tricky. I just don't like the name Blackhole. Gives me the
>> shudders. I sure know what a "blacklist" is and blackhole and blacklist
>> are somewhat
>> synonymous.
>>
>> I picked out 3 out of about 12.
>> Here they are.
>>
>> 2005/10/15 10:06:26 10.1.10.1:0 (mail.brianbinder.com) 10.1.10.200:0
>> ICMP Ping
>> 2005/10/15 10:12:35 10.1.10.1:0 (mail.brianbinder.com) 10.1.10.200:0
>> ICMP Ping
>> 2005/10/15 16:26:11 10.1.10.95:68 (ANONYMOUS) 255.255.255.255:67
>> Bootstrap Protocol Server
>
>ICMP type 0 is ping reply (pong) isn't it? Sure you're not
>pinging or tracerouting mail.brainbinder.com at the time?
>
>> All traceroutes come back to this:
>> Maybe this is all OK and they just happened to pick bad names for their
>> servers. Blackhole? Yuuch!!!
>>
>> Sender ANONYMOUS? Why not a real name?
>
>Because 10.1.10.95 doesn't have a valid reverse DNS record.
>Which it won't, because it's not on the internet. Unless you set
>one up locally.
>
>> Reminds me of Carnivore. Some stealth project :) A bad pick for a name
>> at any case.
>>
>> OrgName: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
>> OrgID: IANA
>> Address: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
>> City: Marina del Rey
>> StateProv: CA
>> PostalCode: 90292-6695
>> Country: US
>>
>> NetRange: 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
>> CIDR: 10.0.0.0/8
>> NetName: RESERVED-10
>> NetHandle: NET-10-0-0-0-1
>> Parent:
>> NetType: IANA Special Use
>> NameServer: BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG
>> NameServer: BLACKHOLE-2.IANA.ORG
>> Comment: This block is reserved for special purposes.
>> Comment: Please see RFC 1918 for additional information.
>> Comment:
>> RegDate:
>> Updated: 2002-09-12
>>
>> OrgAbuseHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
>> OrgAbuseName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
>> OrgAbusePhone: +1-310-301-5820
>> OrgAbuseEmail: ab...@iana.org
>>
>> OrgTechHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
>> OrgTechName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
>> OrgTechPhone: +1-310-301-5820
>> OrgTechEmail: ab...@iana.org
>>
>>
>> The part that disturbs me is from their own website. It says:
>>
>> Special-Use Addresses
>>
>> Several address ranges are reserved for "Special Use". These addresses
>> all have restrictions of some sort placed on their use, and in general
>> should not appear in normal use on the public Internet. The following
>> briefly documents these addresses – in general they are used in
>> specialized
>> technical contexts. They are described in more detail in RFC 3330.
>> "Private Use" IP addresses:
>> 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
>> 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
>> 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255
>>
>> The above address blocks are reserved for use on private networks, and
>> should never appear in the public Internet. There are hundreds of
>> thousands
>
>That's right.
>
>You're not being pinged or attacked from outside your network.
>
>Don't worry about the name blackhole - that's been assigned by
>IANA!
>
>> So, in the end, am I getting spoofed by a hacker, or by my own
>> cablemodem/router?
>
>If it's a spoof (and I very much doubt it), the reply isn't
>going anywhere. Besides which, your router shouldn't be routing
>those addresses inbound so it's almost certainly coming from
>within your network.
>
>
Just checked the firewall again. You are right. I shut down all the other
computers except my main and the re-mailer. I just checked the firewall and
was pinged just a little while ago from 10.1.10.95.
The mail.brianbinder.com might be built into the modem router. I just
checked and the 10.1.10.95 is the IP of my main computer.
As I mentioned before, I gave this PC a different workgroup name to keep it
separated from the rest of the network. Maybe the main computer can see
another computer on the network and is trying to connect.
Looks like I am chasing my tail. Whew!!!!!!! Thank you so very much.
That is a great relief. Paranoia, the stuff re-mailers were made for :)
My Warmest Regards and Thanks, you can't imagine what a relief it is. I
hope you can understand why I worry so much about this PC since it is a
re-mailer.
I feel much better being being safe than sorry. Obviously if I knew more, I
wouldn't have gotten so nervous.
I freely admit I am a noobie, so anything that seems out of place gets my
attention.
Operating a re-mailer is a great learning experience. It makes you question
everything related to the security of the system. I know others are
trusting me to operate a secure system and I don't take that trust lightly.
Again, thank you for taking the time to clarify this for me.
My Most Sincere and Warmest Regards to You,
Twisty Admin
Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FILTHY STINKING FACE. GET OUT NOW PEDOPHILE! 04.02.08 14.03.05
On 26 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:
> i read in some groups you post to, like here, and in the sci hierarchy .
>my question is, why don't you ever reply to the aussie " buffoon " that stalks
>you so much ?
>
Hmmm...
Firstly, I'm not sure *why* you're inquiring? May-haps
you're confederated with the aforesaid liberals who've
been spreading absurd disinformation about your humble
correspondent for years now--most especially since the
7 November 2000 election when Bush was elected but not
elected--precisely as I'd stated; not predicted, but I
clearly stated that that's what would happen and so it
did; not because little old (humble) me stated it, but
rather because reality is foreordained by the Gods--as
the prophets of old and latter days have of one unique
voice pronounced all along. *All* Truth comes from God.
Then when President Bush was (re)elected on 2 November
2004, these rabidly anti-Christ, anti-American liberal
lunatics went off the deep end...well-beyond the point
of no return. Psychiatrists diagnosed their hopelessly-
suicidal syndrome as "PEST" or Post-Election Selection
Trauma, which is a very real, incurable and ultimately
fatal mental disorder--exclusive to left-wing liberals.
Of course--as the Google Groups' archives prove beyond
refutation--I unambiguously stated that President Bush
would be decisively elected over Hanoi John Kerry, and
so that's exactly what happened--again, no thanks owed
to me, but only to God eternal, the heavenly father of
all, the divine and illimitable Author of the Universe.
So you see, because the left-wing liberal losers *HATE*
God and His Son Jesus Christ, they *HATE* the ekklesia
of God i.e. as many who in fact love God and therefore
love our neighbors as our-selves (as Cayce called "the
other self") regardless of his or her worldly religion,
race, nationality, ideology, ad infinitum. That's what
the liberals *HATE* the most: God's Love for us and our
love for God. That's why we're destined to dominate the
whole Earth under the eternal and unassailable reign of
the Dominant one of heaven: the Emperor of the Universe.
As for why I don't talk to my veritable legion of inept
critics, I use layers of usenet browser kill-filtering,
including Hamster, which is context-sensitive. Any post
containing certain offending words and/or phrases are
permanently kill-filed, and I never see them--save for
the few times I search messages on Google Groups. See?
Disinformation, obfuscation and diversion tactics used
by the ever-more desperate liberal press has entangled
them into a downward spiral they'll NEVER recover from.
Like Bill O'Reilly and other (moderate-to-conservative)
super-successful media anchors have observed, they get
constantly hammered by "bad" press of left-wing liberal
smear merchants (e.g. move-on, media-matters ad nauseam)
funded by viciously anti-American nutcases George Soros
& those of his ultra-left-wing, liberal anarchistic ilk.
But as the conservatives are discovering there's really
no such thing as "bad" press per se. Unlike the liberal
press, conservatives rely on the independent-mindedness
and God-given conscientiousness of our astute readership
to decide who's who and what's what. Thus I do the same.
I don't care what liberals think or say about me at all.
They lie when the facts work better. They can't help it.
They have NO clairvoyant vision: as the present, past &
future mutually attests. So let these "dead dogs" lie...
Enjoy Life! (fillet a liberal for lunch)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF13826...@anonymous.poster