Re: Why can't EELBASH admin stop insulting our intelligence?
George Orwell
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUM OF THE EARTH
PATRICK PARIS -- THE FEMALE EUNUCH
In article <7f684e63531fb64a...@ito.tu-darmstadt.de>
Anonymous <mixma...@ito.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
>
> >Anyone who is the least bit familiar with eelbash knows for a fact that the
> >message about Thrasher AND the reply to it were both written by eelbash.
>
> And anyone who's been here for over a year knows that this flood of
> anti-eelbash spam drivel is by Bluejay (aka Michael Gardner) abusing the
> remailers. And no, this isn't Eelbash either. I don't use him because he
> changes his configurations more often than his underwear. But anyone with
> half a brain knows this Eelbasher flood is Bluejay's doing.
eelbash never changes his underwear!
Blujay is Frog Admin's alter-ego
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Proof inside that claiming "no logs" is bullshit!
"stin...@trilightzone.org" <stin...@trilightzone.org> wrote:
> Nomen Nescio wrote:
> > "Hello, I am the owner of privacy.li. Today i saw some extra visitors,
> > so i checked where they came from and arrived here."
> >
> > http://www.privacy.li/forum/viewtopic.php?t=308
> >
> > No logs, huh? Then how did you know there were "extra visitors" and
> > where they came from. No logs=Bullshit! You quite obviously log or you
> > would have absolutely now way to know any of this!
> >
>
> I'm not the owner, but i want to reply to this, logging who visits your
> website is quite normal. You need to make a difference between what
> actually is important to not to log and what is common to log as who
> visits your own website (not who uses your service to visit websites).
>
He was busted. Then he came back with greatwall despite the disclaimer,
or would you choose another remailer? Get back to you. To get the
fixed IP was additional.
<<==========>>
Subject: Re: Pingers/Remops: Lunatic Eelbash at it again
In article <pan.2005.11.09....@eelbash.yi.org>
Eelbash Admin <ad...@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>
>> Steve is filtering 'floods' (BI and stuff like that). You are filtering on
>> keywords.
>
> I am filtering on floods not keywords.
Zax is not blocking any posts from being sent. He is filtering them
from his news server so that people that choose to use him to *read*
news get the clean feed. The messages are of course not deleted,
they're just not on his news server.
No posts being *sent* are being blocked. His news server and his
remailer are completely different things. He is not blocking what
people post by any stretch of the imagination. He is providing a clean
news feed for people that choose to not want to read them.
Please read the message that Zax posted about the difference between
providing a clean feed and remailers filtering stuff out.
<dkshb2$ol1$1...@bananasplit.info>
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it