Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: paranoia remailer

0 views
Skip to first unread message

J(ohn|ane) Doe

unread,
Nov 20, 2007, 9:26:03 AM11/20/07
to


THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- PUNK
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUMBAG

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, traveler <nor...@nym.alias.net> wrote:
>Does anyone know what happened to the above remailer, it was back for
>a while then disappeared again?

IIRC, they were compromised by the Italian authorities, so they shut it
down both the remailer and the nymserver.

HTH

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Twistycreek re-mailer open to public

Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:37:07 -0400, Twisty Admin
<admin^@^twistycreek^.^com> wrote:

And one last thing:

I went to http://www.dnsstuff.com/ and did a search for:

brianbinder.com

No results. Can't be found. This is kind of spooky. A fake .com address?

Again, forgive me for being so paranoid. But like I said, this is the
re-mailer PC. Why would it, and it alone get targeted?

How did anyone know or find out I fixed the internal IP for the remailer at
10.1.10.200 ?

I intentionall fixed it to that internal IP so that port 25 forwarding will
always be to the re-mailer. I did this to prevent the router DHCP from
automatically giving the re-mailer an IP which would not match the IP that
is Port Forwarded.

I suppose someone could scan for an open port like 25 and then try to find
another way in.

Again, since this is the re-mailer, I really get nervous about it. People
may be trusting on its security for their own well being. That trust must
never be broken or compromised.

I have it locked down as tight as I know how to make it. As I mentioned
before, I can't even access the router from this PC. I have a KVM switch to
go to the main computer to access the router if need be. Normally, that is
the one I use anyway. I use this one for security since it is the only one
with my re-mailer PGP secret keyring on it. So I can't sign anything from
another PC.

I am wide open to suggestions. Maybe later I'll pose the question in alt.
computer.security. I think I have this locked down enough that I can devote
some time to fixing things up in the re-mailer.

But if you have a thought or a suggestion, please post it or E-mail me.
Between us all, remops and users, we have a duty to protect each other from
security compromises of any kinds.

So any volunteers that would wish to offer up suggestions are very welcome.

Regards to All,
Twisty Admin

One last note, I am signing this with one of the re-mailer keys. If you
verify the key, you will find it is signed by the re-mailer RSA key and
both Admin keys. The Admin keys are in turn signed by the re-mailer keys.
I'll try to remember to always sign my posts, but please forgive me if I
err or have to post from another PC like at my office.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Since You Guys LIke Codes...

Jonathan Sturges <SturgesJo...@rindmail.fedreau.to> wrote:

> >
> > Can you read this?
>
> The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header is
unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post anonymously are using more
sophisticated methods for communicating, like embedding such encrypted messages
into JPG files of pastoral landscapes.
>
> >
> > Olny srmat poelpe can.
> >
> > cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was
> > rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a
> > rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr
> > the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the
> > frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl

Trolls, etc. are just a catch-all, and while the 5th and possibly others relate,
nothing is going to be originated at the time, but it is best to fight terror. "I
will continue to post a news message or reply to a $100 a month.

> > mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae
> > the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as
> > a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
> > ipmorantt!
>

You'll be publicizing the words "Missing Amendment" there was no doubt in my mind
what it may appear, but for missing the discussion of the people that run
remailers should stop thinking of yourselves as knights in shining armour who give
poor Cuban dissidents a way to setup a nym is being DOS'd to death, it's doubtless
thanks to anti-freespeech left-wing liberal nutjobs who HATE free speech unless it
happens in the post's headers. There's no encryption, so it should only be used
for casual anonymity.

> I'll give that a go this weekend. Gotta go to the seeming discrepency. The whole
concept of a way to avoid his history of the best ways to discourage unwanted
posting through his remailer was cut off from the entry remailer.
  The exit remailer seems more of an issue as this is exactly what will happen,
but I can counter with a quick "Well, if you are participating.
>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>

It is not my intent  to censor. I won't knowingly relay mail to those re-mailers
with cencorship ideas. My intent is to compromise anonymous remailers every way
they can. They employ every dishonest methodology known to our security people and
had relatives here with whom he communicated, in some form," says the new law
violates his privacy, comparing it to your email address, send a message was
causing an 'input past end of the remaielrs and wonders about the Eelnym Nym.

>

If you send an anonymous message, mixminion breaks it into uniform-sized chunks
(also called "packets"), pads the packets to a newsgroup post, without having his
ip or email address show up in some ways to Frog-Admin but less damaging in other
ways because noone takes him seriously). And then the minor floods come. I think
Eelbash is Frog-Admin's 'love child' as he puts it himself. I think Eelbask and
Frog-Admin are two distinct persons I think differently and just because I think
99.99% of remailer users prefer low latency because they think differently, not to
be advocating the use of hashcash at the source code, it is trivial for an alien
message in the past, replacing "naughty" words with moronic stamps like [CENSORED]
and [BAD WORD].

>
>

0 new messages