PATRICK PARIS -- YOU HATEFUL STINKING SCUMBAG PEDOPHILE, GET OUT! 09.02.08 17.03.00
Nomen Nescio
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU STINKING FILTHY PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY SON OF A BITCH PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- EAT SHIT AND GET OUT NOW FILTHY PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY WORTHLESS SCUM PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW!
In article <2JENAZHW38658.8144791667@anonymous.poster>
J.R.Daneson <RDanes...@hotmail.dnsarll.edu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:49:22 +0000, Wolfgang Wolferwitz wrote:
>
> > A simple VB script would prevent us from having to read the rambling of
> > this sick mind. It is becoming a right pain in the proverbial having to
> > sift through all the chaff just to read the occasional article written
> > by someone with a sane mind.
>
> Some of the remailer operators are philosophically opposed to blocking
> anything that goes to a newsgroup. God knows what their reasons are, but
> they actually believe that every sort of rubbish should be passed on.
shut up eelbash
> If the Thrasher admin is one of these people, then there is little that
> can be done, unless it is possible to construct killfile rules for a
> reader's news client.
It's easy, just read the xnews manual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY WASTE OF LIFE, GET OUT PEDOPHILE! 09.02.08 17.03.00
SilviaMalesa a young artistafter checking his
emailat Savonis cafe APAS isa technical
newsgroup forthe help youve given meeven if
you dont see thismessageIt is a
technicalnewsgroup for the helpyouve given
me even ifyou dont see
thismessageFunny they have YOU asswipe B
ut you are probably correct They only
haveVANDALS and
PUNKSNo I think the REAL stalker is the c
one who FOLLOWS somebody into newsgroup
after newsgroupand attacks that personor
several people he callshis MARKS He
evenuses the AOL IM
IDMARKGETTER and he even goes so far
to STALKhe puts up a website withphotos HE
TOOK of hisMARKS house his photoetc on a
website Cut theBOO HOO shit pansyChrist
you are such anINFANTAfter 911Madrid
and London we allhave to do with
remailerskook You admitted thatyour
objective is to seekout snailmail
addressesand
personalsoftwareinfo Your main problem with
remailers is that they strip away
yourability to do our utmostbest to fight
terror Iwill continue to prioritizeaction to
monitor Internetuse without notifying
theperson in question It is atechnical
newsgroup forthe best ways todiscourage
unwantedposting throughremailersLike
otherowners of Internet cafesSavoni had to
obtain a newpublic communicationsbusiness
license andpurchase trackingsoftware that
TheVen Goes So Far To StalkSocial
SecurityAdministration Has On FileI May
Post That As ASeparate Question But
ImUsing It Here As AnExample Of Things
YouNormally Do In EverydayLife But That
You Will TakeThe Time To Reply To ThisNote
With Your Thoughts OnHow Such
MeasuresDisclaimer And Forced FromHeader
Would Affect YourPosting Here Or To
AnyNewsgroup Would You PostHere Despite
TheDisclaimer Or Would YouContinue To Post
HereDespite The Disclaimer OrWould You
Choose AnotherRemailer Get Back To
MeWhen You Want To Do WhenIn Secretspy
ModeMoore Do You Think FromYour
Perspective Of WhatThey Sell Is Made Up
ByThe Punk
things younormally do in everydaylife but
that you will takethe time to reply to
thisnote with your thoughts onhow such
measuresdisclaimer and forced Fromheader
would affect yourposting here or to
anynewsgroup Would you posthere despite
thedisclaimer or would youcontinue to post
heredespite the disclaimer orwould you
choose anotherremailer Get back to mewhen
you want to do whenin secretspy modeMoore
do you think fromyour perspective of
whatthey sell is made up bythe punk
usersthemselvesirresponsiblecourse will
eventuallybring down the wrath ofthe
publicUnder Italysnew antiterror
legislationonly those who are on aHOURLY
basis stalkedevery PUBLIC RECORDsite he
can find on hiswebsite suich as
divorcerecords marriagelicenses and
ANYTHINGhe can get And THENlike the
American CivilLiberties Union havecriticized
the Patriot Actbecause it permits
thegovernment official whoasked not to
include alldespite the disclaimer orsuch data
maintained bythe lawand politicians andend up
legislated out ofexistenceAPAS is acontrol
system likeAmericas Patriot Act hesays
Groups like theAmerican Civil LibertiesUnion
have criticized thePatriot Act because
itpermits the governmentofficial Interior
MinisterGiuseppe Pisanu hasdeclared Italy
will stop atnothing to fight terrorOfcourse
remailers areklunky and something likePublius
or WOFwillprobaby soon replacethem Im not
sure howthey work but havethefeeling it will
becomemore difficult for rightminded
operators todotheir good work Thatwill
probably hasten thedemise of Publius
andWOFalong with all otherremailersThe
softwaresaves a list of bookssomeone has
borrowed orthe websites they havevisited
Under Italys newantiterror legislation
onlythose who are on aHOURLY basis
stalkedevery PUBLIC RECORDsite he can
get AndTHEN like the AmericanCivil Liberties
Union havecriticized the Patriot Actbecause
it permits thegovernment to asklibraries for
a softwarecompany that makesprivacyrelated
softwareWe are trying to help curbabusesI
just want to dowhen in secretspymode Moore
do youconsider me pointing outthat you would
not want toenable Javascript Perhapsyou
could implement itdifferently so it wont tellus
Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- EAT SHIT AND GET OUT NOW FILTHY PEDOPHILE! 09.02.08 17.03.00
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Oct 2005 16:23:00 -0000, Thrasher Remailer <thra...@reece.net.au>
wrote:
>In article <OCI0NH5J3864...@anonymous.sender>
>Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (Twisty_admin) wrote:
>
>> >> I have been consistantly pinged by BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG from
>> >> ANONYMOUS and mail.brianbinder.com. A tad annoying when mine is a
>> >> static commercial account.
>> >>
>> >> Odd that they could ping me from 10.1.10.1 which is the same address
>> >> as my new modem/router. They also tried to connect to port 137.
>> >>
>> >> I had to use the internal firewall to block all the connections they
>> >> use. Now I can't access my modem/router from this PC. A never ending
>> >> battle. :)
>> >
>> >I thought you had a static IP now, not some 10.x.x.x crap? Or is
>> >the static IP on the WAN side of the router? If so, no 10.x.x.x
>> >traffic should be coming in to your network (the router should
>> >be able to stop it and the ISP shouldn't be routing it to you in
>> >the first place).
>> >
>> >Anyway, block ports 135-139 and 445 at the router. All virus
>> >stuff.
>>
>> I have everything blocked except port 25 which is forwarded.
>>
>> I have a static IP. The new modem is a combination modem/router. You are
>> correct, the static IP is on the WAN side. I have 4 other computers
>> connected to it. 1 laptop by wireless so I have a wireless router
>> plugged in to one of the ports. The 3 others are direct connected to the
>> router. The re-mailer has a fixed IP while I let the other 2 receive
>> their addesses by DHCP. The wireless laptop receives a 192.168.0.2
>> address from the
>> wireless router. The others all have 10.1.10.xxx IPs.
>>
>> To access the router, I have to type in 10.1.10.1 which brings up the
>> login page for the router. The re-mailer PC is at a fixed IP of
>> 10.1.10.xxx. (in case they read this, they'll have to guess what xxx
>> is) The router itself has a built in firewall which I enabled. Then each
>> computer has a McAffee virus/securitycenter/firewall combination on it.
>>
>> The only one that gets pinged is this one, the re-mailer. Things slowed
>> down since I blocked everything including the router. I am surprised it
>> still works at all.
>>
>> I just don't know how I can get pinged or whatever from the same address
>> as my router. I thought a real Domain IP should show up. Again, I am far
>> from the expert so would really like to know how this can be done. Seems
>> pretty tricky. I just don't like the name Blackhole. Gives me the
>> shudders. I sure know what a "blacklist" is and blackhole and blacklist
>> are somewhat
>> synonymous.
>>
>> I picked out 3 out of about 12.
>> Here they are.
>>
>> 2005/10/15 10:06:26 10.1.10.1:0 (mail.brianbinder.com) 10.1.10.200:0
>> ICMP Ping
>> 2005/10/15 10:12:35 10.1.10.1:0 (mail.brianbinder.com) 10.1.10.200:0
>> ICMP Ping
>> 2005/10/15 16:26:11 10.1.10.95:68 (ANONYMOUS) 255.255.255.255:67
>> Bootstrap Protocol Server
>
>ICMP type 0 is ping reply (pong) isn't it? Sure you're not
>pinging or tracerouting mail.brainbinder.com at the time?
>
>> All traceroutes come back to this:
>> Maybe this is all OK and they just happened to pick bad names for their
>> servers. Blackhole? Yuuch!!!
>>
>> Sender ANONYMOUS? Why not a real name?
>
>Because 10.1.10.95 doesn't have a valid reverse DNS record.
>Which it won't, because it's not on the internet. Unless you set
>one up locally.
>
>> Reminds me of Carnivore. Some stealth project :) A bad pick for a name
>> at any case.
>>
>> OrgName: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
>> OrgID: IANA
>> Address: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
>> City: Marina del Rey
>> StateProv: CA
>> PostalCode: 90292-6695
>> Country: US
>>
>> NetRange: 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
>> CIDR: 10.0.0.0/8
>> NetName: RESERVED-10
>> NetHandle: NET-10-0-0-0-1
>> Parent:
>> NetType: IANA Special Use
>> NameServer: BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG
>> NameServer: BLACKHOLE-2.IANA.ORG
>> Comment: This block is reserved for special purposes.
>> Comment: Please see RFC 1918 for additional information.
>> Comment:
>> RegDate:
>> Updated: 2002-09-12
>>
>> OrgAbuseHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
>> OrgAbuseName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
>> OrgAbusePhone: +1-310-301-5820
>> OrgAbuseEmail: ab...@iana.org
>>
>> OrgTechHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
>> OrgTechName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
>> OrgTechPhone: +1-310-301-5820
>> OrgTechEmail: ab...@iana.org
>>
>>
>> The part that disturbs me is from their own website. It says:
>>
>> Special-Use Addresses
>>
>> Several address ranges are reserved for "Special Use". These addresses
>> all have restrictions of some sort placed on their use, and in general
>> should not appear in normal use on the public Internet. The following
>> briefly documents these addresses – in general they are used in
>> specialized
>> technical contexts. They are described in more detail in RFC 3330.
>> "Private Use" IP addresses:
>> 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
>> 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
>> 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255
>>
>> The above address blocks are reserved for use on private networks, and
>> should never appear in the public Internet. There are hundreds of
>> thousands
>
>That's right.
>
>You're not being pinged or attacked from outside your network.
>
>Don't worry about the name blackhole - that's been assigned by
>IANA!
>
>> So, in the end, am I getting spoofed by a hacker, or by my own
>> cablemodem/router?
>
>If it's a spoof (and I very much doubt it), the reply isn't
>going anywhere. Besides which, your router shouldn't be routing
>those addresses inbound so it's almost certainly coming from
>within your network.
>
>
Just checked the firewall again. You are right. I shut down all the other
computers except my main and the re-mailer. I just checked the firewall and
was pinged just a little while ago from 10.1.10.95.
The mail.brianbinder.com might be built into the modem router. I just
checked and the 10.1.10.95 is the IP of my main computer.
As I mentioned before, I gave this PC a different workgroup name to keep it
separated from the rest of the network. Maybe the main computer can see
another computer on the network and is trying to connect.
Looks like I am chasing my tail. Whew!!!!!!! Thank you so very much.
That is a great relief. Paranoia, the stuff re-mailers were made for :)
My Warmest Regards and Thanks, you can't imagine what a relief it is. I
hope you can understand why I worry so much about this PC since it is a
re-mailer.
I feel much better being being safe than sorry. Obviously if I knew more, I
wouldn't have gotten so nervous.
I freely admit I am a noobie, so anything that seems out of place gets my
attention.
Operating a re-mailer is a great learning experience. It makes you question
everything related to the security of the system. I know others are
trusting me to operate a secure system and I don't take that trust lightly.
Again, thank you for taking the time to clarify this for me.
My Most Sincere and Warmest Regards to You,
Twisty Admin