Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated
Dismiss
See shortcuts

PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT SHITBAG. GET OUT FILTHY PEDOPHILE! 19.02.08 01.03.01

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Anonymous

unread,
Feb 19, 2008, 6:24:12 AM2/19/08
to

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- WE HATE YOUR STINKING ASS. GET THE FUCK OUT YOU FILTHY PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- IDIOTIC STINKING PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW!
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING, GET THE FUCK OUT NOW YOU STINKING PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING FILTHY PIG SHIT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW!

wrote:

> This whole group got flooded much worse than now by Eelbash for many
> years and even when I was in a mental institution for a couple of months
> the flooding continued (and I was on dail up at the time to add to
> that). Then Frog-Admin announces his remailer gone and so are the floods
> all of the sudden.

Flawed logic I think Thomas. You're suggesting Frog's demise and the end of
the flooding make the two synonymous. It's equally likely that some other
person who had an obsession with FrogAdmin simply stopped flooding when
Frog went away. There's really no way to know for sure.

Not that I'm defending anyone mind you.

> Then Eelbash comes (worse in some ways to Frog-Admin but less damaging
> in other ways because noone takes him seriously). And then the minor
> floods come.

I'm not even sure I'd call a couple days of random text a flood, but I
suppose that's subjective.

> 1. I think the floods are linked to remailer load.

Lost me. ???

> 2. I think someone who hates remailers is behind it.

I think someone who cares little one way or the other is behind it. I think
someone is doing it out of spite for other group participants or just to
feel "cool", and their feelings about remailers in general have nothing at
all to do with it.

A true "hater" would flood other groups, and as far as I'm aware no other
groups were flooded. Of course I just might be clueless here...??

> 3. I think think Eelbash Admin and Frog-Admin are two distinct persons

No doubt.

> 4. I think Eelbash *loves* Frog-Admin
> 5. I think Eelbash is Frog-Admin's 'love child' as he puts it himself

I think that's more information than I need to know. <g>

> 6. I think Scientology is twisted, secretive and hateful toward
> remailers enough to experiment with disrupting the network

I agree with you there. I think that Scientology and Kooks like KRP are
responsible for the vast majority of random usenet abuse, and because of
that, the bulk of the bad reputation Remailers have. :(

> 7. I think Eelbask and Frog-Admin got something in return for the
> flooding
> 8. http://xenu.net/archive/ot/ can save you a lot of money
> 9. Remember who got pissed at penet.fi (it was CoS)

Hmmm..... a link between FA and the Cult of Scientology?

Sounds like a basis for the next bockbuster SciFi movie/novel Thomas. Color
up the characters a bit, maybe make the flood a more devious attack, and
make the victim the Iraqi Embassy... you might be on to something. :)

*I* think that if the Co$ was behind some nefarious activity it wouldn't' be
limited to these groups, and they wouldn't give a rat's ass about people
like you and I who took shots at the flooders and those we thought might be
responsible. *I* think their attack would be far more broad and subtle,
like the random abuse that permeates some groups for a while, then seems to
move on once they're bloodied up enough. This is *far* more damaging to
remailers than flooding APAS and a few people who already have their minds
made up about Remailers.

Just my $.02 worth... :)

--
Hand crafted on October 20, 2005 at 19:26:32 -0400

Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
-Groucho Marx

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- WORTHLESS HATEFUL STINKING SCUMBAG PEDOPHILE, GET OUT! 19.02.08 01.03.01

product is best left on
the websites and not in
the
newsgroupIt is simple any
one who has been on Usen
et for more than a month
 KNOWS  that making
complaints to remailer
operators is mostly a
TOTAL WASTE OF TIME
FEW will do anything
Those that do get
harassed by the
Department of Homeland
Security combined with
what the US says on
those matters still carries
the day worldwide Still
but hopefully not for
everIf I am using to
send this message has one

message
Funny they have YOU ass
wipe
 But you are probably cor
rect They only  have
VANDALS and PUNKS
No I think the REAL stal
ker is the cone who FOLL
OWS somebody into 
newsgroup after newsgroup
and attacks that person
or several people he calls
his MARKS He even
uses the AOL IM ID
MARKGETTER  and he e
ven goes  so far to STALK
he puts up a 50+ page
websitemonitoring and
censorship to destroy the
little bastardsSavoni
says the new law violates
his privacy comparing it to
HIM POOR BABY Anyone
given thought to the
CubansEven if you are one
of the lice remailers that
follow such anThe
employment database is
required to include all
such data maintained by
the Department of
Homeland Security
combined with what the
ven goes  so far to STALK
Social Security
Administration has on file
I may post that as a
separate question but Im
using it here as an
example of things you
normally do in everyday
life but that you will take
the time to reply to this
ven goes  so far to STALK
he puts up a 50+ page
websitemonitoring and
censorship to destroy the
little bastardsSavoni
says the new law violates
his privacy comparing it to
HIM POOR BABY Anyone
given thought to the
CubansEven if you are one
of the lice remailers that
follow such anThe
employment database is
required to include all
such data maintained by
the Department of
Homeland Security
combined with what the
ven goes  so far to STALK

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- YOU STINKING FILTHY PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW! 19.02.08 01.03.01

Thrasher Remailer wrote:
> In <435a4e91$0$11067$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl>, nos...@hccnet.nl wrote:
>
>>rema...@twistycreek.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Anonymous <anon...@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article <43597cbd$0$11078$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl>
>>>>"" <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too and this will be paradise for
>>>>>me!
>>>>
>>>>Eelbash must not retire! He is the single most entertaining person in
>>>>here although he doesn't intend to be.
>>>>
>>>>I read apas once a week and get great amusement out of reading
>>>>Eelbash's silly ideas for censoring (sorry I mean "stopping the
>>>>psychos"). I also enjoy reading his sock puppets where he tries to
>>>>pretend he's someone else that just happens to think and talk exactly
>>>>like him.
>>>>
>>>>He is my internet soap opera. Eelbash must stay.
>>>
>>>
>>>Wonderful entertainment that bloke.
>>
>>I don't think it is so wonderful. He is a PR danger to *all* remailers.
>>(and he knows it too)
>
>
> Wrong again. You're making a VERY spectacular fool of yourself all over again. Too stupid to even learn from the first time you did it too.

First time I said FA was a PR danger. Now I say EB is a PR danger. You
are right, I haven't learned. I still believe this..

Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy"

0 new messages