PATRICK PARIS -- YOU HATEFUL STINKING SCUMBAG PEDOPHILE, GET OUT! 18.02.08 17.03.02
Fritz Wuehler
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- GET THE FUCK OUT YOU HATEFUL STINKING SCUMBAG PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY SYPHILITIC PERVERT PEDOPHILE GET OUT NOW!
PATRICK PARIS -- GET OUT NOW YOU FILTHY SON OF A BITCH PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PIECE OF FRENCH PIG SHIT, GET OUT PEDOPHILE!
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:40:03 +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> In article <MIOP4P1V3864...@anonymous.sender>
> Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (Admin_rbtor) wrote:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Send to rema...@twistycreek.com
>> with subject:
>>
>> remailer-key
>> remailer-config
>> remailer-adminkey
>> dest-block
>>
>>
>>
> Great to see you back!
Me too, but I hope your remailer will not be as up and down as Eelbash has
been.
Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY STINKING HUMAN MAGGOT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT! 18.02.08 17.03.02
-----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
Message-type: plaintext
In article <5ae18c74cf5ef488...@anon.bananasplit.info>
Anonymous <anon...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
> In article <IMGICP8M3866...@anonymous.poster>
> panta-admin <anon...@panta-rhei.dyndns.org> wrote in part:
> <snip>
>
> > So it seems your problem is in the reply block.
>
> <snip>
>
> > Use multiple different reply blocks. I usually use three.
>
> <snip>
>
> Thank you for all the advice. I shall do the tests that you
> suggest. Can I continue trying to activate the reply block for
> the specific nym, or is it too late now to set up a working
> reply block for it?
>
> Secondly, could you guide me, if you know how, to set up more
> than one reply block using Quicksilver?
Just skip a line and add the second right under the first, etc, etc.
-----END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- STINKING SCUMBAG PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT! 18.02.08 17.03.02
Jonathan Sturges <SturgesJo...@rindmail.fedreau.to> wrote:
> >
On the other hand, what you want to blow up a 50+ page website. He on a solid re-mailer. Entry and exit.
> > Can you read this?
>
> The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post anonymously are using more sophisticated methods for communicating, like embedding such encrypted messages into JPG files of pastoral landscapes.
>
> >
> > Olny srmat poelpe can.
> >
> > cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was
They also tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa". He was busted.
> > rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a
> > rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr
> > the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the
> > frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl
> > mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae
> > the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as
> > a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
> > ipmorantt!
>
> I'll give that a go this weekend. Gotta go to the seeming discrepency. The whole concept of a way to avoid his history of the best ways to discourage unwanted posting through his remailer was cut off from the entry remailer. The exit remailer seems more of an issue as this is exactly what will happen, but I can counter with a quick "Well, if you are participating.
>
> >
> >
>
>
I read apas once a week and get back to an address at the site about him? After nearly pissing my pants in the manner that it's capstring suggested.
>
>
>
>
>
>