PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE GET OUT! 30.01.08 08.03.02

[Non scrivetemi]

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING, GET THE FUCK OUT NOW YOU STINKING PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY STINKING SCUM OF THE EARTH, GET OUT PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- WE HATE YOUR STINKING ASS. GET THE FUCK OUT YOU FILTHY PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- WORTHLESS PIECE OF GARBAGE, GET OUT YOU STINKING PEDOPHILE!

In <ALSD1Y6I38640.6392592593@anonymous.poster>, wehr...@eelbash.yi.org wrote:
>I use hashcash with the remailer as I do with Panta, so I don't see
>any disclaimer. But what is wrong with the disclaimer? I thought
>the whole idea was to irritate people enough to use hashcash but
>not enough to stop using the remailer.
>
>You must be awfully sensitive if a little 31 line disclaimer bothers
>you that much.
>

If you think that 31 line disclaimers are nothing to be bothered about then I will expect you to immediately delete all of your hashcash tokens and the minting software and post via eelbash without them. I you love the fucking disclaimer that much, then live with the thing.

As for me? I've set up eelbash in Window | Remailers Config | Never choose these remailers as AUTO or RANDOM

screw a bunch of eelbash.

>On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:27:04 -0600, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
>
>> From: Fake Name <bou...@eelbash.yi.org> Comments: PLEASE SEND COMPLAINTS
>> TO IAMU...@HOTPOP.COM
>> INCLUDE THE NUMBER 777 IN THE SUBJECT to ensure that your email
>> reaches me. PLEASE SEND COMPLAINTS TO IAMU...@HOTPOP.COM
>>
>>>*****************************************
>>>
>>>The message below came through a remailer. Take that into account if you
>>>read the message.
>>>
>>>Let's face it, most remailer messages are sent for purposes of amusement,
>>>usually harmless, sometimes not so harmless.
>>>
>>>People are stalked, and harassed via remailers. Messages that are really
>>>important are few and far between.
>>>
>>>Harmless amusement is enough to justify remailers, in my opinion.
>>>
>>>But how do you keep that minority of messages posted by crazy or
>>>malicious people from getting through?
>>>
>>>You can't always block them, but you can make it a bit harder by
>>>requiring something like hashcash.
>>>
>>>This irritating disclaimer is present on all non-hashcash newsgroup
>>>messages. you can get rid of it by minting a valid hashcash token and
>>>including it as a header in your message.
>>>
>>>size: 27 bits
>>>resource: eelbash
>>>validity: 60 days
>>>
>>>I hope you enjoy using the remailer and will try it again.
>>>
>>>*****************************************

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- GET OUT NOW YOU FILTHY PIECE OF STINKING SCUM PEDOPHILE! 30.01.08 08.03.02

Afn rfYbiy.o@$ R,r'u

Eelbasher

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE GET OUT! 30.01.08 08.03.02

Jonathan Sturges <SturgesJo...@rindmail.fedreau.to> wrote:

> >

On the other hand, what you want to blow up a 50+ page website. He on a solid re-mailer. Entry and exit.

> > Can you read this?
>
> The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post anonymously are using more sophisticated methods for communicating, like embedding such encrypted messages into JPG files of pastoral landscapes.
>
> >
> > Olny srmat poelpe can.
> >
> > cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was

They also tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa". He was busted.

> > rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a
> > rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr
> > the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the
> > frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl
> > mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae
> > the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as
> > a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
> > ipmorantt!
>
> I'll give that a go this weekend. Gotta go to the seeming discrepency. The whole concept of a way to avoid his history of the best ways to discourage unwanted posting through his remailer was cut off from the entry remailer.  The exit remailer seems more of an issue as this is exactly what will happen, but I can counter with a quick "Well, if you are participating.
>
> >
> >
>
>

I read apas once a week and get back to an address at the site about him? After nearly pissing my pants in the manner that it's capstring suggested.

>
>
>
>
>
>