!!TOP!! Download Stamp On It Got The Beat

[Rebecca Astrup]

Stamp on It consists of six tracks and incorporates various genres of dance.[7] The lead single "Stamp on It" was described as a R&B and hip-hop-based dance song characterized by "piano and bass rhythm" with lyrics about "expressing the story of reaching the top spot in a fierce stage competition".[8][9] The second track "Goddess Level" was described as a "powerful" dance song characterized by "heavy trap beat and rhythmic brass sound".[10] The third track "Alter Ego" was described as a dance song featuring "various bass riffs in the chorus" with lyrics about "the seriousness of environmental problems".[11] The fourth track "Rose" was described as a song R&B hip-hop song featuring "vocal chop and minimal beat" with lyrics about "comparing beauty that cannot be overlooked to the sharp thorns of a rose".[12] The fifth track "Outlaw" was described as dance song featuring "dynamic bass rhythm layered with synthesizer rhythm".[12] The sixth track "Mala" was described as a "hybrid" pop song featuring "the sound of a flute mixed with the sound of bass rhythm".[10]




GOT the beat (God the beat, belonging to SM Entertainment) will release their first mini album 'Stamp On It' on January 16th.



As GOT the beat is an SM project unit based on intense dance songs and performances, this album contains a total of 6 songs in the dance genre that stand out with various charms.



In particular, GOT the beat consists of 7 members: Boa, Taeyeon, Hyoyeon, Seulgi, Wendy, Carina, and Winter. In January of this year, 'Step Back' sound source and stage release alone won three awards on music broadcasts, topped domestic music charts, and topped iTunes It has proven its popularity and topicality, such as topping the song chart and recording 100 million views of the stage video, raising expectations for a new look to be shown after a year.



In addition, GOT the beat appeared at 'SMTOWN LIVE 2023: SMCU PALACE KWANGYA' held from 1:00 PM (Korean time) on January 1st prior to the release of this album, and released a new song stage in advance to draw attention from fans around the world. expected to do







download stamp on it got the beat

Download File https://xiuty.com/2xwaeq






I really thought the prospect of getting an entire mini album by the group was interesting. We finally get to hear more of this group and what they are about and I have to say most of these songs are better than title song Stamp On it. I personally like Goddess Level the best just because that chorus is irresistible and the melody is everything to me. Though most of these songs have their moments I love but also that irritate me and annoy me at some point. Seems like GOT the beat are a really mixed back when it comes to their music.


New Beat hi hats came about with input from drummer Louis Bellson. The Zildjian web site givesthe year as 1963:Image: New Beat First Year 1963

Paul Francis (head of R&D at Zildjian) says 1968 in the NAMM 2013 release video for theyear of the first New Beats (start at 4:20), but that seems to be for the pair sold as a pair. So it is looking like there are two first dates, andthat is how I've noted them in the timeline. I later came across a site (now defunct)and found the same idea of two dates given there, although they point out thatthe exact year might be between 1963 and 1965. It's nice to have independent confirmation. In addition Magnus (member on VDF) emailed Zildjian about them and got this replyThe "New Beat" concept actually started with the suggestion from the great drumming artist and Zildjian endorser, Louie Bellson in 1965. He recommended the use of a heavier bottom cymbal than what was commonly used up to that point in time. It was actually the bottom cymbal that was referred to as a "New Beat" (Mr. Bellson actually coined the term) that could be applied to any weight top cymbal (medium to thin weights). This went on for a couple of years until a dedicated New Beat Hihat pairing was established in 1967-68 using a medium weighted top cymbal to go against the "New Beat" bottom. It was then that the classic New Beat Hihats were born. Since then, they have remained our most popular hihat creations.So we have a few different threads of evidence for two different years of introduction.But as usual the exact year can't be pinpointed 100%. For simplicity I've written therest of this essay as if the years are 1963 and 1968, but remember that this is really19632 and 19682. [quick edit added 4-dec-22]: The release year for just the bottom (with ink sayingNEW BEAT HI-HAT) is 1963. The ink didn't need to specify top or bottom because there was only the bottom.The bottoms were paired with a top, which accounts for the TOP HAT and other weightclass ink (eg THIN or MEDIUM-THIN or MEDIUM). Release year for the pair as a pair is 1970, but at firstthey still had what we nickname 1960s stamps because the 60s stamps were in factory use until at least 1977. Please keep this in mind as you read the rest of the 4 year old text.We have learned a lot more in the past four years of research work. So what was happening before New Beats came along? Basically hi hats tended to be aboutthe same weight on the top and bottom. Say within 80g, and often within 50g. Hi hats in this "equal weight" or "matched" tradition continue tobe offered, but most manufacturers also have a New Beat style pair in their hi hatofferings. And what is this magic New Beat ratio? The usual formula is given as2:3 for top:bottom. That ratio can also be expressed as 67% and the average across all the pairs I've collected up (52 pairs and counting) is 71%. But the variation in individual pairings goes from 60% to 80% (in rounded figures). So there appears to be lots of natural variation around the expected ratio. Here is a plot so you can get an idea of just how much variation there is:Graph: 14" New Beat Top vs Bottom Weights



If you would like to look at the weights in greater detail, here is a link to the rawdata on which the graph is based: click here and then use the back button in your browser to get back here.The data in the table is sorted in increasing order by the weight of the top.


One issue with all of this is that we can't be sure all of the pairs are original factory pairs. People can play mix and match (I've been known to do it myself) and sellers can beabsolutely convinced a pair is factory original simply because that's what the guythey bought them from said. We'll have a closer look at the actual variation in weights, andexamine the evidence that they got heavier over time. I've also got some preliminary pricing info on used New Beats versus matched hats in the 14" size.But first, here is a gallery ofthe different eras.First Generation New Beat Ink (1963-mid 70s)Image: New Beat 1st Gen inkThis is the first generation of ink I have identified for the New Beat. This ink is found on the inside of the bottom cymbal. Most often the ink isonly on the bottom, which is is to be expected with the bottom cymbal beingsold separately (1963-1967). The defining characteristics of this ink arethat it is straight (not curved) and says BOTTOM HI HAT / NEW BEAT. Image: New Beat 1st Gen top ink pre 1968Prior to the 1968 pair being available, the ink on the top cymbal might say THIN orMEDIUM depending on the weight class of the top. The bottom of a pre 1968 pair would show the BOTTOM HI HAT / NEW BEAT, as indeed the bottom of this particular pair does. So itwas a THIN (776g) over a medium weight bottom (1094g). Another style of inkwhich can appear on the top hat of a New Beat pairing is just model ink sayingTOP / HI-HAT with no indication of weight class. This style of ink with therelatively taller and more slender letters was around in the 1950s as well. Image: The above image is from a 15" pair of New Beats and the die stamp on thereis the larger (1.5") 1960s die stamp. The bottom hat of this pair revealed anew style of ink which doesn't mention BOTTOM or TOP at all:Image: New Beat 1st Gen alternative inkThis might be the very first ink style when the name "New Beat" referred to just a bottom, andthus the ink didn't need to specify top or bottom. I've seen two examples sofar and these were on bottom cymbals with a 60s die stamp. But there areother sorts of ink showing up as well. On a pair from the UK I found inkstamps which include diameter info, and the Ottoman portion of the Avedis stamp.This may be only on UK (or European) exported cymbals.Image: New Beat 1st Gen export inkIn addition to the size ink the top cymbal of this 1960s pair also includesa sticker. Image: New Beat StickerI've recorded two of these New Beat stickers so far, as well as aRock Hats sticker. Image: New Beat 1st Gen top ink post 1968There arealso a few top cymbals with straight top ink which says TOP HI HAT / NEW BEAT as shown above, and we presume that top ink comesin as of 1968 when the pair were sold as a pair. Note that the ink from the top cymbal of a Hi Hat pair often ends up polished off,so just because you don't find it doesn't mean it wasn't there. If the top ink isstill there it can help pin down years, if there is no top ink that doesn't provideany information one way or the other. Of course, ink on the bottom of a cymbal canbe polished off as well, but it seems like more top ink disappears. Anther thingwhich has come to my attention when looking at a lot of the 1st gen New Beat inkis that it is crooked, or not positioned evenly over the bell L to R, or often both. This seems to be the way with much of the early model/weight class ink oncymbals and isn'tjust restricted to New Beats. The die stamp found on cymbals with this 1st gen ink is the 1960s stamp (as one would expect)and I've recorded both the early 60s and the later 60s heights. Note that there arealso pairs of New Beat 1st gens which have the 70s stamp on them, so this generationdidn't stop at the end of the 60s stamp era. The ink generation change doesn't line exactlywith the die stamp era change. Image: New Beat 1st Gen top hammering viewThe New Beats from this first generation tend to have quite obvious hammering on the top. Image: New Beat 1st Gen bottom hammering viewand no obvious hammering underneath. This is consistent with Bill Hartrick'sobservation that there was an early 60s date for the change in hammering totop side only. The lathing looks fairly even (compared to 1950slathing), and goes up onto thebell on the top side. Inside the bell (on the bottom side of the cymbal)the tonal grooves are often just slightlyfiner (definition link coming to as yet unwritten page on lathing).In both pictures above, the tophat is on the left (with the slightly enlarged mounting hole).Second Generation New Beat Ink (mid 70s-1981)Image: New Beat 2nd Gen inkIn the 2nd gen ink, the word order haschanged from BOTTOM HI HAT / NEW BEAT (1st gen) into BOTTOM NEW BEAT / HI HAT (2nd gen). The ink is also curved down at the edges. The addition of the Hollow Zildjian Ink logo to the bottom cymbal dates the secondgeneration of ink dates to 1978 to 1981. But that is just the year at which we knowit is present. It could have started a bit earlier than 1978. Image: New Beat 2nd Gen top inkDuringthis time there is also ink on the top cymbal saying TOP NEW BEAT / HI HAT. Boththe top and bottom ink is curved (a little higher in the middle). If you havelearned to recognize the signs of a 70s stamp (particularly the verticalalignment and lack of bold Zildjian) the you should agree with me that thisis a 70s stamp shown with this ink. You don't need to have a Hollow Zildjian ink logo showing to qualify for2nd generation, but the ones I've recorded so far do date from this period. Image: NB 2nd Gen ink on both cymbalsSometimes both cymbals will still carry the hollow Zildjian ink logo underneath. The abovepicture illustrates a particularly well preserved pair. It appears that more care istaken in putting the ink on accurately in this generation (and later). No more beingoff center or crooked. By 1976, New Beats are being described as a Medium weight top over a Heavy bottom in the Zildjian catalog. (link coming).The lathing tends to be the same as the 60s lathing, and this remains true forlater generations. The hammering on the top becomes less obvious. Third Generation New Beat Ink (mid 1982-1991)Image: New Beat 80sThis is the style from about 1982 and it is the third generation. This ink change isn't unique to New Beats, it's just the general progression of ink in the A series.This style lasts until about 1991. The most obvious change is that the script Zildjian logo ink has become solid and appears at 6 o'clock on both the bottomand the top. Image: New Beat Ink with diameterThe top model ink now has the diameter under it as well, in both inches andcm. It continues to have the diameter measurements under it from here on out. The rest of this section will be added when I get to it, but you can return to the galleryand follow the general ink changes from here on out. Changes in New Beat Weights Over TimeGraph: 14" New Beat Top Weights by Era



New Beat weights got heavier over the years. Both the tops and the bottoms increased. The patternis statistically significant even though there is lots of variation. The variation means it is possible to find a lighter pair from the 1980s which weigh about the same as a heavier pair from the 1960s. Graph: 14" New Beat Bottom Weights by Era



These are boxplots (or box and whiskers plots) and they tell you the whole distribution of the data at a glance. The box encloses half the observations (aka the interquartile range). The solid line is the median of the distribution. The whiskers (lines up and down from the box) go out further to include most of the observations, and the little circles outside the whisker range represent outliers. Outliers are defined as outside 1.5 times the interquartile range. A more complete description is here which is price based. In this case outliers represent unusually heavy or light cymbals rather than unusually low or high prices. These plots show the clear increase in weight by decade, and they also show thereset of weights in 2013 which moved the tops back down to the 60s - 70s weights.Note that the 2013 revamp targeted a change to the weights and curvature of the tops but not the bottoms,and that comes through in these plots. You can see that the bottom weights haven't gone right back down to 60s-70s level, although the bottoms will still be a bit lighter so that magic New Beat ratio stays about the same. Graph: 14" New Beat Ratios by Era



As one wouldexpect, the ratio after the 2013 revamp is a bit lower and also back in the60s-70s range. In fact, the ratio post revamp is at the lower end of the 60s-70s range and lookinglike that traditional 2:3 or 0.66 once again. Back to the golden era. go to Avedis by Years

f5d0e4f075