PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL STINKING PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW! 11.02.08 01.03.01

[Anonymous Sender]

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- GET THE FUCK OUT ANDS STAY OUT STINKING PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY SON OF A BITCH PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- EAT SHIT AND GET OUT NOW FILTHY PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- GET THE FUCK OUT YOU FILTHY STINKING MAGGOT PEDOPHILE!

In article <UD9P7ZXE38646.2953356481@remailer@twistycreek.com>
Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (My =?iso-8859-1?Q?2=A2?=) wrote:
>
> References: <4301b0d2$0$11061$e4fe...@news.xs4all.nl>
> <ccdb148aace8030a...@dizum.com>
> <CEUC1SCD3858...@reece.net.au>
>
> In article <CEUC1SCD3858...@reece.net.au>
> Thrasher Remailer <thra...@reece.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > Nomen Nescio wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, ""
> <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >It is very important that we do not repeat our
> history. America is way
> > > >to bloody and aggressive right now for a stable
> world with respect for
> > > >all religions. I also repeat my claim that they
> have not learned from
> > > >WWII (thinking of Bush (your Avatar of War)).
> > >
> > > Before you go plastering invective all over the US
> for "bloody and
> > > aggressive" actions, you need to look at where the
> bloodshed over radical
> > > Islam began, and who has been throwing the "first
> stones". America (and
> > > Western civilization) has been fighting off
> elements of radical Islam for
> > > more than 20 years.
> >
> > > The west has been on the defensive.
> > >
> > > In order to think clearly, you really have to get
> past your media generated
> > > hatred for Bush. It clouds your perception.
> >
> > Which media outlets are generating hatred for Bush?
>
> CNN

Such uninformed BS could only come from a Foxnews watcher.

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY SYPHILITIC PERVERT PEDOPHILE GET OUT NOW! 11.02.08 01.03.01

In article <dl0lk9$h4v$1...@bananasplit.info>
Zax <fle...@bananasplit.info> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:30:02 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio wrote in
> Message-Id: <e71548d39fc10cd9...@dizum.com>:
>
> > Anonymous <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
> >
> >> Zax is not blocking any posts from being sent. He is filtering them
> >> from his news server so that people that choose to use him to *read*
> >> news get the clean feed.
> >
> > You forget that Zax' mail2news and remailer also post through his news
> > server.
>
> Banana is Middleman, it doesn't post or mail to anything.

Well, under most circumstances. This was Post:ed through banana. Not sure
if I needed to include hashcash, so I did anyway. Would it Post: to other
groups besides this one?
So I suppose if a person chose to flood some group using banana as an exit,
it could be done.

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- YOU STINKING FILTHY PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW! 11.02.08 01.03.01

AD wrote:

> "Jeffrey F. Bloss" <jbl...@tampabay.mapson.rr.com> wrote:
>>^ krp ! wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds like RATIONALIZATION............... *I* have NEVER NEVER
>>> NEVER
>>> NEVER NEVER NEVER used a remailer. GOT IT MORON? NEVER!
>>> I do NOT have the anonymizing software on my computers. PERIOD!
>>
>>Message-ID: <TNK938ME3841...@reece.net.au>
>>Message-ID: <tjhXd.77945$Dc.44771@trnddc06>
>>
>>The same message posted first through a remailer, then through your own
>>account.
>>
>
> In regard to the message IDs mentioned above, which are also mentioned on
> the page www.aboutkenpangborn.com/altatheism.html. To me this seems to
> indicate that Kenny is guilty of the very offenses which he accuses others
> of: forging and harassing through the remailers. The message posted
> through the remailer looks like it was a forgery of someone else in
> another group, and the fact that Kenny a short while later sent the exact
> same text
> from his known address makes it indeed seem that he was the forger. Could
> I be interpreting this wrong?
>
> If he indeed is the sender, then it would seem he is delibarately abusing
> remailers so that he can have more ammunition in his arguments here in
> APAS. I am curious to know how others may interpret these facts.

The term 'net-kook' comes quickly to mind