Cross-Examination of Chief Justice of India

[rna...@yahoo.com]

S.O.S - e - Clarion Of Dalit - Weekly Newspaper On Web
Working For The Rights & Survival Of The Oppressed

Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.4 issue. 40…… 06/10/2010

home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/eclarionofdalit/ ,
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit ,

SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html


Editorial : CROSS-EXAMINATION of Chief Justice of India - Half
of Former Chief Justices of India are Corrupt

DOUBLE STANDARDS OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & KARNATAKA POLICE -
PIL Appeal To Honorable Supreme court of India For Writ of Mandamus

Information input forms part of process of one’s expression. One’s
expression in any forms – written , oral , etc becomes information
input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply.
Information & Expression are inseparable parts & form lifeline of a
democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic
fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When
a person’s right to expression is violated , his other rights to
equality , justice , etc also are violated. Suppression of
Information amounts to curbing of Expression.

In a democracy , people have a right to know how the public servants
are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding behind
the veil of Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage
created by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up
public servants are hiding their own corruption , crimes ,
mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed
intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling
affirming that CJI is under RTI purview & bound to answer RTI
request , is noteworthy.

Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI,
President of India , DG & IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The
information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned
in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past ,
present continuing injustices meted out to millions of Indian
citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of Indian judges ,
police & public servants . The information we sought would expose
the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals in public service. The
information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national
secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals ,
traitors in the public service & strengthens our national security ,
national unity & integrity.

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider
this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their
duties & to answer the questions. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.

Your’s sincerely ,
Nagaraj.M.R.


SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html

Cross Examination of Chief Justice of India , Chief Justices of
state High Courts , DGPs of all Indian States / UTs ,
Loksabha Speaker , Rajyasabha Dy Chairman , Speakers of all Indian
State Legislative Assemblies / Legislative Councils – Law
Makers in witness box


When everybody else does the mistake , wrong doing , indulges in
corruption , judiciary alone must be pure like virgin to punish &
guide the wrong doers. Now , the apex court of the land & the highest
judicial officer of the land , the conscience keeper , protector of
rights , Constitutional guardian of the land – The Honourable Chief
Justice of India himself Has been found guilty . SHAME SHAME.

Nowadays , we are seeing criminalization of politics , judiciary &
police. The rowdy elements have become MLAs & MPs & frequestly indulge
in fisticuffs , vulgar abuses in the precincts of the house itself .
These rowdy elements take money for asking questions in the
parliament , to vote for bills & for a price pass legislations
favouring lobbies of rich crooks. The police frame , torture
innocents & let out rich crooks for a price . For a price police
destroy evidences , records and create fake records , evidences.
Finally there are judges who issue arrest warrants , give bail , give
acquittal & pass favourable judgements ALL FOR A PRICE . SHAME
SHAME . These corrupt judges , police , MPs , MLAs each take salary
& perks far exceeding lakhs per annum , but serve rich crooks instead
of Indian Public. These corrupt are parasites & deadlier , state
enemies than naxalites , terrorists. Democracy in our country , our
hard won national independence is endangered by these parasites ,
corrupt judges , police & people’s representatives only. These
parasites themselves are responsible for origin & growth of
naxalism / terrorism in india .
These corrupt parasites will feel , understand the pain only when
they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In
whose Court of justice MATCH FIXING is not there & every body is
equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites
ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.

Read full case details at following web site
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html

Hereby , we DEMAND the Honourable Chief Justice of India to answer
the following questions in public interest , for national security ,
for National unity & integrity.


Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in
lock-up / fake encounters ?

Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree
torture on prisoners ?

Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with
criminals & backstabs our motherland , it's national security ?

Q4. Don't the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the
interest of public welfare , law & order ?

Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public
servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police
taking any action with respect to them ?

Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by
constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead
of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of
parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject
those accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector test ,
etc to ascertain truth & provide timely justice ?
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants
evidences , witnesses to take action against the rich & mighty crooks.
Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap ,
he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences ,
witnesses. Why this double standard ?
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental
rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants don't give full ,
truthfull information. Still , police / courts don't take action
against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an "amicus curie" before jain
commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime
minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news
paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service,
by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in
cases & by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits ,
why ?
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police & intelligence
personnel about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even
once , why ?
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these
injustices ? are not police responsible for it ?
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of
witnesses & all parties involved , both during case & afterwards ?
Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in
their family's wealth year after year ?
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of
peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While
appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes
in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies
cross-check candidate's background. However is there no background
checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy
to national secrets ? why ?
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during
presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front
running candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused
public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world.
In india , more than half the population are poor , people are
starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded & aided
terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of
Bangladesh , GOI has funded & aided terrorist outfits like LTTE ,
TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist
outfits have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are
these acts of GOI just & legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those
murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any compensation to those victims
or their family mebers ? why not ?
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist
groups , GOI has funded & aided couter terrorist groups , is it right
& legal ?
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed ,
trained & funded "salwa judum" to counter naxalites. Salwa judum
cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action
of government just & legal ?
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even
where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being
slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka
state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous
charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest
brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports
personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements
& attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf
countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with
TADA / POTA ? why ?
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully
knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous
arms & ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing
public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is
charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally
applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away
animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of
mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically
mighty & rich ?
Q23. Law is one & same for all , the public servants, police
interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich & poor ? why
this differentiation ?
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to
international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles.
Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is
also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at
consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company
stated that all it's products come with IMEI number only & stated that
the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO
COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their's as it doesn't have IMEI
numbers. Further nokia stated they don't have any business
relationship with either tata indicom or it's dealer. However the tata
indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first
hand products , but doesn't have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer
in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand
sets & cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well
as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who
want to evade police tracking. What police are doing
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to
close a case ie to file "B" report , when after certain time limit no
leads are found in investigation ?
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully
fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be
closed with "B" report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in
court ?
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict
of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court
order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does
the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv,
news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time
criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70
inmates without any basic requirements ?
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG & IG of
police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of
complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on
same day, even copies were given to police & intelligence personnel ?
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges
to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not
burdened with frivolous court cases & can concentrate on their
constitutional duties. But these privileges doesn't cover the
individual actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry
harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law
enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home
ministry seeking permission & home ministry sits over files for
months. This gives the accussed ample time to destroy evidences. Is it
right & legal ?
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions
alone ? if not what does it cover ?
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the
prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other
people's representatives are facing criminal charges ?
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing
criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were
eventually convicted ?
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have
have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by
underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other people's representatives are wanted by
police in various cases . but shown in the police records as
absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house
as usual ?
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she
occupy any public office before naturalization ?
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or
have a spouse of foreign origin ?
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual
citizenship ?
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign
origin & while they are on foreign tour , from national security
perspective ?
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister
mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi's family
received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political
parties , when that culprit party comes to power all the cases
involving it's partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse
prosecution fails to prove it's case & prefers not to appeal. Just
remember Bombay riot case involving shiv sainiks & others , when shiv
sena – BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against it's
partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government
just & legal ?
Q48.what damages has been done to india's national security due to
mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?
Q49. What action by the government ?
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in
various foreign countries ?
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police
failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years & acquitted by
courts upon finding them as not guilty ?
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges
against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up
deaths , fake encounters & 3rd degree torture ?
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF
personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations ,
3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand
veerappan's territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission
findings ? if not why ?
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my "fundamental duty" hereby do
offer my conditional services to GOI & GOK to apprehend corrupt public
servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing
crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more & even their family
members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government
provide insurance coverage to police & their family members on the
lines of defense forces ?
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable & his
family ?
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to
police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in
public interaction , human rights ?
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry ,
orderly duties of ministers ?
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in
india since 1987 ?
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING ,
LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING
ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-
analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the control of police
department ?
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like
bodies ?
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise
meetings & subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else
face the consequences , is it right & legal ? this happens mostly in
real estate matters.
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand
veerappan during his various kidnappings ?
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi
during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the
media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff
court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such
cases accessible to public ? if not why ?
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or
has it just ended with their resignation from services or his superior
judge not allotting him any judicial work ?
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their
wrong doings ?
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed /
tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?
Q78. how ? if not why ?
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges
including the wealth in the name of judge's family members ?
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on
sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher
court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for making
unjust judgement & meating out injustice ?
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against
judges are made , why the accussed – judges are not subjected to tests
like "poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc" , in the
interest of justice & truth ?
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible
to be the members of "Karnataka state government judicial department
house building co-operative society". Then how come , many judges
including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society
& allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few
thousands by the said society at said society's – judicial layout ,
yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks
in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the
whole thing grossly illegal ?
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central
government or state government or government agency is one of the
parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out
of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps ,
etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd
degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court
which is handling that tortured person's case responsible for it ?
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges &
the police officers for committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of
attempt to murder & murder ? if not why ?
Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions court , has called for the
candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide
notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish
me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit
ranking for the post of peon.
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the
candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide
notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me
merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.
Q91. when a person doesn't get adequate food , medical care while
under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge
dealing that person's case responsible for it ? what action ?
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners ?
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial
custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence
periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the
judge finds him guilty of offence & gives him 3 months sentence. What
about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible
for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action
against the judge in such cases ?
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years & finally the judge
finds them as innocents & acquits them of the charges. What about the
prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the judge
responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ?
remedy ? what action against the judge ?
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions &
the actions arising out of misuse of office ?
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions
as judges & their personal actions as individuals ?
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges
of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from
bar , as the judges ?
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges ,
as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes – scheduled
caste , scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities & women
are their in supreme court , state high courts & subordinate courts ?
kindly provide specific figures .
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce
the accountability of judges & to check corruption in judiciary ?
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of
affairs of judiciary ?
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at
the official meetings , parties , at the tax payer's expense ?
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic
drinks , in their hotel bill & claimed traveling allowance ?
Q106. what action has been taken against – selectors ie Karnataka high
court judges & newly selected women judges involved in roost resort
scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?
Q107. when common people / tax payers & even government employees are
not getting proper health care from government at government
hospitals. Is it right & just to provide premium health care to
judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in
India , abroad , all at tax payer's expense ?
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to
ascertain their health , mental faculties & mental balance in the
midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting
applications seeking public interest litigations ?
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing
"amicus curie" in a case ?
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an
"amicus curie" in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi's assassination case , was not
considered by the court ?
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-
motto action ?
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily ,
with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto
action in all such cases ?
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal
opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy
person's rights violation ?
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility
of the court , both during hearing of the case & afterwards ?
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during
the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what
action ?
Q118. when the corrupt police officer & government prosecution
advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation
intentionally to fail the case – to cover-up rich crooks , high &
mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police ,
government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing
authorities , to ensure proper & fair prosecution of cases against
rich & mighty ?
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist
NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-
judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers ,
revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary
monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of
human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme
court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you – the
honourable court ready to utilize it ?
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable
supreme court of India , through government of india's on-line
grievance system ( DPG & DARPG ) :
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/
2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/
2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/
2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 , DARPG/E/
2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/
2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/
2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/
2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/
2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/
2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/
2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/
2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 ,
DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India ,
copies of which are available at following web pages
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw
what are the status of those appeals ?
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing
crimes – rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money ,
untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of
judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty
for books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking
round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of
official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making
contempt of court , constitution of India & citizens of India. How you
are protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution of India &
citizens of India ? please answer.
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to
policemen's family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen
& their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency ,
ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans ,
etc ?
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to
national security is on par with defense forces.
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates
in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term,
abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health,
lives of prison in-mates ?
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged
an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in
jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such
guilty police personnel & pay it as compensation to victims of police
failures & atrocities ?
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign
origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option ,
to occupy any constitutional office ?
Q133. during british rule in india & various other british colonies ,
criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India &
other british colonies. After india's independence what happened to
those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it
continue with the prosecution ?
Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government continued with
the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash
Chandra bose ?
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or it's
colonies , to face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS
GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why ,
whom ?
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide
information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in
response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 ,
why ?
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me
information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to
others , in turn they transferred the application to some others.
Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the
union home secretary has got copies of all those replies in response
to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply
to my present RTI request ?
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court ,
we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND & prosecution advocate
mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich
criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences &
prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you
are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such
advocates in practice ?
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields
enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the
government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally
permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the
cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices
like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under
the constitution (Article 21) ?

Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators &
parliamentarians by the constitution of India?

a) Inside the House b) Outside the House

Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries,
like

a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India

c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC

e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.

Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned
constitutional functionaries ?

a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.

b) Cover both their official & personal actions.

Q146. Are the privileges defined & codified ?

Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?

Q148. Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed
by the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional
functionaries or equal or below ?

Q149. Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House
of commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and
court of records ?

Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the
executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the
House of commons and House of Lords in England ?

Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of
the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by
raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?

Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent
or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by
peoples representatives & executive ? does not it amount to
infringement of Judicial powers & contempt of the court by the House.

Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than
constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in
importance to it ?

Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national
activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil
of official's secret act & go unaccountable for his actions and go
unpunished by his legal immunity privileges

Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme
court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to
codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their
privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to
legal scrutiny. ?

Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats
in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payer's money, they get
their pay, perks & lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a
vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or
parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ?

Q157. Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed
by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay,
perks & lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a
citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a
seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more
valid) in a democracy ?

Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to
fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament
acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper
legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?

Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a
Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the
legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?

Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or
Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?

Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto
action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in
Media ?

Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting
public, as the Public Interest Litigation" ? In some cases, the Public
or the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of
the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.

Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal
aid ?

Q164. Communication - free flow of information is the lifeline of a
democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the
Right to Information of Citizens ?
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of
Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all
internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is
it just & legal ? give me the names of accused judges & description of
charges against them ?
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty
judges ?
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of
appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of
Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court
of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary
inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time
no human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he
arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+
judges facing enquiry ?
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a
district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering
fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be government holidays )
facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired
into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any
wrongdoings?
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under
the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses
& brain. That is why the acts & sayings of drunkards , committed /
said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the
police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only
they apprehend many suspects & produce those suspects at the
residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night.
Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses
of drunken police & judges work properly to do their respective duties
in identifying criminals , apprehending them & to issue judicial
orders. Are these actions of police & judges in drunken state legal ?

Q 172 . What action has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against
the guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against union
carbide officials ?

Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials ,
district magistrate , state ministers & central ministers who fully
aided the criminals – Union Carbide official Mr. Anderson to escape
law , to jump bail & flee the country without court’s permission ?

Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with
respect to their contempt of court & for aiding a criminal to
escape ?

Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India ,
who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ?
what action has been taken against the CJI who became an official of
the trust belonging to the criminal ?

Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant
who decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal
gas tragedy ?

Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department
& pollution control board officials who have failed in their duties ,
inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?

Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who
decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal
although they don’t have right to do so ?

Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the
trial court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public
prosecutors & Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept quite
all along and didn’t press for the extradition of the criminal
Mr.Anderson , for producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the
trial court ?

Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government
officials & people’s representatives who became part of Operation
Crime Hush Up & aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders of
thousands & maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak
Tragedy?

Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt
ministers , corrupt labour / pollution control board officials HUMAN
BEINGS ?
Q 182 Why police are not registering my complaint against CJI
& other VVIPS ,Even after years ?
Q 183 don’t the police of vijayanagar police station mysore have
legal jurisdiction to register the case against these VVIPs ? or
just because the criminals happens to be VVIPs ,they are not
booked by police? If the said police don’t have legal jurisdiction
to book these VVIPs , they should have transferred the complaint
to those authorities who have jurisdiction & authority to book &
prosecute these VVIPs , but not done so , why ?
Q 184 are not all these actions , of VVIPs & police amounting to
cover up of crimes & criminals ? are not these cover ups itself is a
crime ?
Q 185. Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as
PIL by courts of justice . however my appeals for justice concerning
public welfare , national security sent through post , e-mail to
supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest
litigation , why ? does not these acts of Supreme court amount to
aiding criminals , anti nationals?
Q 186 Are not the honourable chief justice of india together with
the jurisdictional police & Revenue district magistrate responsible
to protect the fundamental & human rights of people ? why the
CJI , Mysore DC & Jurisdictional Police have failed to protect the
fundamental & human rights of people including mine ? For all the
previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal
nexus Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate &
jurisdictional police are together responsible , if anything
untoward happens to me or to my family members or to my dependents the
trio – Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable District
Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore city &
Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police station , mysore
will be responsible .

These corrupt parasites will feel , understand the pain only when
they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In
whose Court of justice MATCH FIXING is not there & every body is
equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites
ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.



POLICE NOT REGISTERING COMPLAINT AGAINST CHIEF JUSTICE OF
INDIA & OTHERS


From,
NAGARAJ.M.R.
LIG-2 / 761, HUDCO FIRST STAGE,
LAXMIKANTANGAR, HEBBAL,
MYSORE - 570017.

Through,
Honourable DG & IG of Police ,
State Police H.Q ,
Bangalore.

To,

Honourable Circle Inspector of Police,
Vijayanagar Police Station,
Mysore.

Honourable Sir,

Subject : Violation of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS by
Honourable Chief Jusice of India & H.E.Honourable President of India
& other public servants
Karnataka Police are NOT registering & acting on
my complaint to them dated 04.07.2009

In India , as per constitution of india all citizens are equal , have
right to equal oppurtunity & equitable justice irrespective of caste ,
creed , religion , etc. the constitution has guaranteed these to every
Indian citizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also ,
every humanbeing on earth has got HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of his / her
birth.
However in india , CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES / PUBLIC SERVANTS have
forgotten this & are acting as lords , autocrats - unquestionable
public masters. CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS
appointed to serve the public, public are the kings of democracy ,
they are the taxpayers & paymasters of this very same public servants.
In India , corruption has spread it's tentacles far & wide , it has
not even spared the judiciary. The last resort of commonman for
seeking justice is judiciary , even there corruption has spread.In
present day India , if one is rich , he can committ any type of crime
& get away clean from courts of law. there are corrupt police
officials who modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences ,
takes up different line of investigation , fix innocents , coughs-up
false confessions from innocents by 3rd degree torture , file B report
closing the case , decides not to appeal in higher court of law ,
etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see the list of millionnaire police
officials who are caught by karnataka lokayukta.
Next step , the prosecutor & defense advocate strikes a deal ,
manipulates evidences , manipulates way of presentation of case & way
of argument favouring the rich crooks for a price , as observed in
high profile BMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN & defense
counsel RK ANAND. In this way , if corrupt police & advocates ,
together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge is
left high & dry eventhough the judge is honest, he is left helpless.
to add to this , when the judge himself is corrupt , people's last
hope , democracy is dead. Nowadays we are hearing too many reports of
irregularities in judiciary.
our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION
before hon'ble supreme court of India but the vested interests there
are not accepting it as PILs. WHAT DOES PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION
MEANS ? ISSUES WHICH ARE OF PUBLIC CONCERN AFFECTING MANY NUMBER OF
PUBLICS.
The issues raised by us for sample :
1. sale of fake medicines & adulterated food products , beverages ,
colas affecting the health of millions of Indians & public of
importing nations who are importing the same dangerous products from
india .
2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits ,
tribals , backward castes by government authorities whereas
regularising illegal land encroachments , illegal buildings by high &
mighty people in total disregard to law. in some cases government has
even made contempt of court , by defying court orders & enacting
special laws all to favour rich land grabbers.
3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws ,
pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies.
4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servants
leaking india's defense secrets to foreign countries & some
politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by anti nationals
DAWOOD IBRAHIM & underworld dons in gulf countries & elsewhere. these
type of appeals are for public good , national security , as public
are affected by them. still supreme court of india is not considering
our repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to consider
even a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courts even have the
right to initiate suo-motto action for public good , inspite of
absence of any appeals / complaints. over & above this at the time of
my very first appeal my income was very low & i was a retrenched
factory employee who was eligible for free legal aid, even free legal
aid was not given to me. Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals the
Honourable chief justice of India & H.E.Honourable President of India
are not giving the requested information . these action of CJI &
PRESIDENT OF INDIA is aiding high & mighty criminals , anti
nationals , amounts to suppression of information , truth ,
evidences , which is a cognizable offence.
SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html

CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF
INDIA -
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI –
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE –
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE –
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE –
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
reliance industry where is accountability ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
crimes at infosys campus
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
crimes of land mafia in India
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,
http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
currency thefts in RBI Press
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80
killer colas & killer medicines of India
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201

We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies , public
servants , but it is an appeal to the honest few in public service ,to
bring to book their corrupt colleagues.The Honourable Chief Justice of
India & H.E.Honourable President of India have violated their oaths of
office , failed in their constitutional duties , suppressed material
truths / informations & thereby repeatedly violated my
Constitutionally guaranteed FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS &
Obstructing me from performing constitutionally prescribed FUNDAMENTAL
DUTIES AS A CITIZEN OF INDIA.
Hereby , i do request you to legally prosecute the below mentioned
public servants viz
1. H.E.Honourable President of India
2. Honourable Chief Justice Of India
3. Union Home Secretary , GOI
4. Governor , Reserve Bank Of India
5. Director-General & Inspector General Of Police , government of
karnataka
6. Commissioner , Bangalore Development Authority
7. Commissioner , Mysore Urban Development Authority
8. Commissioner , Mysore City Corporation
9. Labour Commissioner , government of karnataka and
10. all public servants belonging to tax dept , pollution control
board , etc mentioned in the above cases with web links.
on the above mentioned charges. the whole issue of this news paper &
the related materials at the weblinks provided, forms part of this
complaint. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where
for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result
like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the
government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me
the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for
questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police
station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this
type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or
investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my
family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents ,
loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above
mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if
criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against
me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be
effective.
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the governmentof
india is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of
my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal
nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army
Welfare Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land
arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police
officials , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries. Thanking
you.
Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.


Date : 05.09.2010 your's sincerely,
Place : Mysore nagaraj.m.r.



……………………..DECLARATION………………………

Name : ...........................NAGARAJ.M.R.

Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP
WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017
INDIA

Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S - e – Voice For Justice

Periodicity : WEEKLY

Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB

Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any
donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other
organizations / individuals .

Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of
advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.

Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJ.M.R.

Nationality : INDIAN

Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraj M R , Editor , S.O.S- e –
clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated to JSS
Medical College , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or
Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be handed
over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of
medical students.

Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraj M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion
of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated to Mysore Eye
Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at
the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to
Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye
transplantation to the needy.



Home page : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper/ ,
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/ ,
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/ , http://indiapolicelaw.blogspot.com/
,
, http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com ,

Contact : nag...@yahoo.com , nagar...@hotmail.com ,

Cell : 0 9341820313

I ,NAGARAJ.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are
true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called
to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the
losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation ,
job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB
personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of
injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the
guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the
culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must
not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward
happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with
hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical
care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned
accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal
nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my
dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental
rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If
anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents or to my family
members - In such case Chief Justice of India together with the
jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for
it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. one
crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is
eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be
donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be
recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension ,
property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants &
Constitutional fuctionaries.



date : 05/09/2010…………………………..your's sincerely,

place : India…………………………………Nagaraj.M.R.


An Appeal to Shri.Sunil Thomas , Honourable Registrar (Admn) & RTI
Apellate Authority , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi.

From,
Nagaraj .M. R.
Editor , S.O.S e-Clarion of Dalit & S.O.S e-Voice for Justice,
# LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO First Stage, Laxmikantanagar,
Hebbal , Mysore . PIN-570017 Cell – 09341820313

To ,
Shri. Sunil Thomas ,
Honourable Registrar (Administration) / RTI Appellate Authority ,
Supreme Court of India,
New Delhi.

Honourable Sir / Madam ,
Subject : APPEAL No.300/2010
Reference : Your Letter No.F.1/RTI/A.300/2010 dated 30.07.2010
On-Line Grievance Registration No . DPG/M/2010/80199

At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to the honest
few public servants in public service including judiciary. However,
the corrupt in public service don’t deserve respect as individuals –
as they are parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the
chairs they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.

All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the
weblinks mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The term “JUDGE”
mentioned throught includes all public servants discharging judicial
functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to
Chief Justice of India.

Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages & is
for sale. It is a SHAME. The persons who raise their voice seeking
justice are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has already
attempted to silence me in many ways . If anything untoward happens to
me or to my family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice
of India together with jurisdictional police officer will be
responsible for it.

Hereby, we do once again offer our conditional services to the
honourable supreme court of India & other government authorities, in
apprehending criminals including corrupt judges & police. Herewith ,
we once again appeal to the honourable supreme court of India , to
consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.

The public servants & the government must be role models in law
abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the
teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same
mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished &
reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-
free under his patronage. even if a police , public servant commits
a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the
aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of
the land itself commits crime - violations of RTI Act ,
constitutional rights & human rights of public and obstructs the
public from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what
happens ? it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in
power , criminals in public service to committ more crimes. that is
exactly what is happenning in india. the educated public must raise
to the occassion & peacefully , democratically must oppose this
criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can
build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.

Kindly go through the following articles & provide justice by giving
complete truthful information to us , by publicly answering the
following questionnaire in an unambiguous manner.

The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to
each citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect &
uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic institutions , to
protect our national integrity , to respect & protect the rights of
our fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has the right to
obstruct the discharge of these duties by citizens of India. No legal
privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the
FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF CITIZEN'S OF INDIA.
We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has
guaranteed those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India
& by birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as
individuals. To express ourselves , we need information , data feed
back , to ascertain whether we are getting equal opportunity ,
whether we are getting equitable justice , etc , we need
information . so ,
basically Right To Information is an inalienable part of our
fundamental rights & human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed
time limit , responsibilities of public servants up to certain
extent. However the citizen's fundamental right & human right to seek
information extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act.
Hereby , we seek complete truthful information from supreme court of
India , with respect to my RTI application appeal no : APPEAL NO.
300/2010 .. HEREBY , WE ARE ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC
SERVANTS IN PUBLIC INTEREST & JUSTICE. Hereby , we request you to
register this appeal as a PIL petition & to ascertain the stand of
apex court on various matters raised in my RTI Application , in
public interest & equitable justice. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.

Your's sincerely,
Nagaraj.M.R.

SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT
OF INDIA


The public servants & the government must be role models in law
abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the
teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same
mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished &
reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-
free under his patronage. even if a police , public servant commits
a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the
aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of
the land itself commits crime - violations of RTI Act , constitutional
rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public from
performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ?
it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power ,
criminals in public service to committ more crimes. that is exactly
what is happenning in india. the educated public must raise to the
occassion &
peacefully , democratically must oppose this criminalisation of
judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF
MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.

In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic
freedom RIGHT TO INFORMATION & EXPRESSION , is not honoured by the
government,as the information opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps & leads
to their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants are least bothered
about the lives of people or justice to them. these type of fat cats ,
parasites are a drain on the public exchequer . these people
want ,wish me to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH closed . so
that, a voice against injustices is silenced forever , the crimes of
V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.
To my numerous appeals , HRW's appeals to you ,you have not yet
replied.it clearly shows that you are least bothered about the lives
of people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent to
protect the criminals at any cost. you are just pressurising the
police to enquire me ,to take my statement, to repeatedly call me to
police station all with a view to silence me.all of you enjoy "legal
immunity privileges" ,why don't you have given powers to the police /
investigating officer to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why
don't all of you are not appearing before the police voluntarily for
enquiry ?at the least why don't all of you are not sending your
statement about the case to the police either through legal counsel or
through post? you are aiding criminals ,by denying me job
oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS mysore , city civil
court ,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc & by illegally closing
my newspaper.
there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath of
office. this amounts to public cheating & moral turpitude on your
part.
1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.
3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.
4.you are sponsoring & aiding terorrism & organized crime.
5.you are violating the fundamental & human rights of the citizens of
india and of neighbouring countries.
6.you are violating & making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER
to which india is a signatory.
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a
citizen of india.
you are hereby called upon to SHOW-CAUSE within 30 days , why you
cann't be legally prosecuted for the above mentioned crimes .

If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the
sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss
of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government.
prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the
complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for
questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police
station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this
type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or
investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my
family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents ,
loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above
mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if
criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against
me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be
effective.
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government
of india is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors
of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal
nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army
Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land
arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police
officials , Judges , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries.
Thanking you.
Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.

Date : 14.05.2010 your's sincerely,
Place : Mysore nagaraj.m.r.


JUDICIAL CORRUPTION
MY LORDS, THERE’S A CASE AGAINST YOU
Former Union law ministers are spearheading a campaign against sitting
judges they accuse of being corrupt. What is the higher judiciary
doing to clear itself of these grave charges?
Avinash DuttNew Delhi


Under observation: The Supreme Court of India
Photo by K. Satheesh

Senior lawyers have complained to the CJI and the President that
Justice Bhalla illegally amassed properties
The campaign by some senior lawyers and former law ministers who have
questioned the integrity of sitting high court judges is set to
ratchet up the growing confrontation between the legislative and the
judicial arms of the government. Former Union law ministers Shanti
Bhushan and Ram Jethmalani are leading the battle against what they
claim are corrupt practices in the highest echelons of the judiciary.
Bhushan has categorically condemned the rot he feels has set in the
judicial system. “The judiciary of this country is not merely
unaccountable, but corrupt and brazenly so,” he wrote in a letter to
President APJ Abdul Kalam on December 17. Bhushan has demanded that
the President initiate impeachment proceedings against Justice Jagdish
Bhalla of the Lucknow Bench of the Allahbad High Court. On December
14, a Supreme Court (SC) collegium recommended that Justice Bhalla be
appointed the Chief Justice of the Kerela HC.
Bhushan and Jethmalani, along with noted lawyers and former justices,
including Rajendra Sachar, Indira Jaisingh and Hardev Singh, have
formed the Committee on Judicial Accountability (COJA) and presented
documents to the Chief Justice of India (CJI), YK Sabharwal, to
support their complaint against the sitting judges. COJA complained to
the CJI on July 11 that Justice Jagdish Bhalla had amassed several
illegal properties in the name of his wife and other close relatives.
Justice Vijender Jain, the former senior Judge in the Delhi High
Court, who was recently appointed the CJ of Punjab and Haryana HC, is
also in COJA’s line of fire.
By questioning the integrity of Justices Bhalla and Jain, Bhushan has
thrown open the much larger question of judicial accountability. (See
interview) “Leave aside taking any action against corrupt judges like
Justice Jagdish Bhalla and Justice Vijender Jain, the CJI has been
actually avoiding even properly investigating charges against them,”
says Bhushan. According to documents produced by COJA on 21 July 2003,
Renu Bhalla bought a 7,200 sq. metre plot near the Noida-Greater Noida
expressway. On 28 March 2005, Uday Shankar, dsp, Gautam Buddha Nagar
(Noida’s official name) submitted a report to the area dm in which he
states that the sellers of the plot belong to the “land mafia”. In an
enquiry submitted to the dm on 26 June 2005, RK Singh, the area sdm,
also described the sellers as belonging to the “land mafia”. According
to the two reports, the plots constituted a portion of the gram samaj
(joint village property) land, illegally grabbed by the “land mafia”.
(All the documents relating to the transaction are in possession of
Tehelka)
The SDM’s report says that at the time of the transaction, the plot
was worth Rs 7.20 crore in the open market, whereas Renu Bhalla paid
Rs 5 lakh for it. The two reports also state that the sellers of the
plot have been charged in several criminal cases, and had sold plots
to several influential people to curry favour with them. Renu Bhalla
is the wife of Justice Jagdish Bhalla.
Bhushan has also drawn attention to the July 2005 draw of lots for
allotment of plots in Sector 44 in Greater Noida. When the
computerised draw threw up several influential names, a few people
approached the Allahabad HC alleging foulplay. In October 2005, the HC
decided that the case warranted a fresh draw of lots and ordered a cbi
inquiry into the scam. Among those who had been allotted plots in the
scrapped list were Aarohi Bhalla and Sheeba Sabharwal. Aarohi Bhalla,
who is the son of Justice Bhalla, was allotted plot number f-52, while
Sheeba Sabharwal, daughter-in-law of the CJI YK Sabharwal was allotted
plot number f-78. In November 2005, the Supreme Court stayed the
Allahabad HC judgement, putting the cbi enquiry and the HC’s order to
hold a fresh draw of lots on hold.


Admissible in court? Documents furnished by COJA against the justices
Members of COJA have offered to discuss the matter in person with the
CJI but they say that they are still waiting to hear from him. Five
months after their initial request, they sent another application to
the CJI in November. This time they sought his permission to register
an FIR against Justice Bhalla, claiming that their initial evidence
was enough to register an offence against him under the Prevention of
Corruption Act.
“The CJI did not even call us to hear our point,” says Bhushan. “I
don’t know why Justice Sabharwal is shielding Justice Bhalla!” Bhushan
is equally critical of Justice Vijender Jain.
Justice Jain, who took oath as the new CJ of Punjab and Haryana HC in
November, had to endure many delays before he could be appointed to
the post. The CJI had to make three efforts to promote Justice Jain. A
collegium headed by the Chief Justice of India first recommended
Justice Jain’s name for the post in July. However, President APJ Abdul
Kalam returned the file, causing a minor embarrassment to the CJI and
the Union government. When the collegium reiterated its recommendation
through the government in November, the President had to sign the
file.


Third time lucky: Chief Justice Vijender Jain

When a collegium headed by the CJI recommended Justice Jain’s name,
the President returned the file
Earlier in May, a proposal by the CJI to make Justice Jain CJ of the
Maharsahtra HC was stonewalled by a judge in the three-member
collegium who questioned Justice Jain’s integrity. The member on the
panel cited a complaint made to former CJI RC Lahoti against Justice
Jain in January 2005. The CJI revived the proposal a month later, but
again a judge on the collegium opposed his appointment. Finally, a
fortnight later, in July 2006, the CJI made his third attempt to
promote Jain, this time to the Punjab and Haryana HC.
This time around, to address dissenting voices, the CJI also consulted
other SC judges who happened to be former chief justices of the Delhi
High Court. According to reliable sources, Justice Jain’s former
seniors also questioned his integrity. However, on the basis of a
majority, the proposal to promote him was forwarded to the Union
government for the President’s assent.
A major hurdle in promoting Justice Jain continued on page 8 continued
from page 6 was a complaint by one Subhash Agrawal who approached then
CJI RC Lahoti in January 2005 with the complaint that Justice Jain had
violated the code of conduct for judges. Agrawal claimed that Justice
Jain gave a judgement in favour of someone with whom he had “family
relations”. He produced a copy of the invitation card of the
litigant’s granddaughter’s wedding, held in April 2001. According to
the card, the venue of the wedding was the official residence of
Justice Jain. (Tehelka has obtained a copy of the wedding card from
the Central Information Commission). In November 2004, Justice Jain,
hearing an appeal, decided a civil suit in favour of the person who
had held his granddaughter’s wedding at his official residence.
When there was no response to his complaint in October 2005, Agrawal
approached the SC to find out the status of his complaint under the
rti Act. He was told that his complaint was in the relevant HC file.
Not satisfied, Agrawal approached the Central Information Commission.
On the commission’s insistence, the SC finally told Agrawal that his
complaint had not actually been forwarded to the HC, as the SC has “no
administrative jurisdiction” over high court judges. Therefore, the
complaint was pending before the CJI, YK Sabharwal. The commission
asked the CJI to act on the application. The CJI finally settled the
complaint, saying he found no merit in it. When Agrawal asked for
reasons behind the decision, he drew a blank.
It’s not just Bhushan who feels the need to bring about accountability
and transparency in the judiciary. Janata Dal (U) president Sharad
Yadav says the issue will be discussed when the Judicial
Accountability Bill is tabled in Parliament. “When the government
tables the bill, all its aspects will be discussed,” Yadav told
Tehelka.
CJI YK Sabharwal could not be reached for his comments. Despite
conciliatory notes from him there are all indications that the clamour
surrounding judicial misdemeanour and the demand for greater
accountability will only increase in the days to come.
Dec 30 , 2006



Related Stories

• My lords, there’s a case against youFormer Union law ministers are
spearheading a campaign against sitting judges they accuse of being
corrupt. What is the higher judiciary doing to clear itself of these
grave charges? Avinash Dutt reports
• Serious charges

• Dubious first

• ‘The Bill for Judicial Accountability is a sham’Former Union Law
Minister Shanti Bhushan is angry at the state of the judiciary in
India. He talks toAvinash Dutt
• Delhi HC dilutes the RTI ActThe rules framed by the court deter
those who seek information about its workings, reports Avinash Dutt

• RTI TangleBy Avinash Dutt

‘Half Of The Last 16 Chief Justices Were Corrupt’
The decision to declare assets is a big victory. Supreme Court lawyer
Prashant Bhushan tells SHOMA CHAUDHURY what else is rotting in our
judiciary


In public interest Prashant Bhushan has championed the fight for
judicial accountability
Photo: SHAILENDRA PANDEY
It’s great judges have agreed to declare assets. But will it really
help? Politicians do it too.
This decision is very welcome, even if it’s only happened under public
pressure. It is proof of the power of public opinion. And even though
declaring assets is a relatively minor aspect of judicial
accountability, it will help. If a judge misdeclares his assets,
there’s a chance someone might know he has particular properties he
hasn’t declared, and may point it out. One could then examine if these
can be explained within their legal income.
The debate around judicial accountability has got really hot. Are
there watershed events that triggered this?
Not in my own perception, but I think for the public there were two
watershed events – the Chief Justice Sabharwal case (where there was
an allegation that Chief Justice YS Sabharwal’s orders to demolish
commercial outlets in Delhi directly benefited his sons, who were
partners with some mall developers) and the Ghaziabad Provident Fund
scam. Both these cases got wide media attention. A 2006 Transparency
International report said the judiciary in India is the second most
corrupt institution after the police.
You’ve been at the forefront of the judicial accountability campaign.
Why?I have been witness to judicial corruption in the courts for a
very long time. I know decisions are passed for extraneous
considerations, but it’s difficult to get hard evidence of this. There
have been highprofile impeachment attempts, for instance, on Justice
Ramaswamy, Justice Punchi and Justice Anand. Yet, they all went on to
become chief justices. In my view, out of the last 16 to 17 chief
justices, half have been corrupt. I can’t prove this, though we had
evidence against Punchi, Anand and Sabharwal on the basis of which we
sought their impeachment.
What is the root cause of judicial corruption then, and what are your
key demands?
Our key demand is an institutional mechanism for entertaining
complaints and taking action against the judiciary. Nothing exists
today. Everyone realises impeachment is impractical. To move an
impeachment motion you need the signatures of 100 MPS, but you can’t
get them because many MPs have pending individual or party cases in
these judges’ courts. In the impeachment proceeding against Justice
Bhalla, the BJP declined to sign because LK Advani had been acquitted
by him in the Babri Masjid demolition case. Such political
considerations prevail all the time. An in-house procedure was set up
in 1999, post a chief justices’ conference in 1997, but that too is
activated only selectively. For example, the complaint against Justice
Bhalla was that he had purchased land worth Rs 4 crore at Rs 4 lakh —
approximately — from land mafia in Noida. This was based on a report
from the DM and SSP of Noida. This land mafia had several cases
pending in courts subordinate to Justice Bhalla. Another complaint was
that in the Reliance Power matter, though his son was the lawyer for
Reliance Power, Justice Bhalla constituted a special bench while he
was the presiding judge in Lucknow. He sat in the house of one the
judges at 11pm at night to hear their case and pass an injunction in
their favour. We asked Chief Justice Sabharwal to initiate proceedings
against Bhalla, but he refused.
Similarly, Justice Vijender Jain decided the case of a person whose
granddaughter had been married out of his own house. He was a close
friend but he still heard and decided the case in this person’s
favour. The point is, in these cases though very specific complaints
were made to the then Chief Justice of India (CJI), he didn’t do
anything to activate the in-house procedure. All these judges have
gone on to become chief justices. Bhalla is still chief justice of
Rajasthan; Virendra Jain became chief justice of Punjab and Haryana.
What’s the answer?The first problem is that there is no independent
institution for entertaining complaints and taking action against
judges. There has to be a National Judicial Complaints Commission —
independent of the government and judiciary. It should have five
members and an investigating machinery under them. The second problem
lies in the Veeraswamy judgment, which ordered no criminal
investigation can be done against a judge without prior written
permission of the CJI. That’s what happened in Karnataka. There was a
complaint against several judges visiting a motel and misbehaving with
women. When the police officer came, the judges threatened him and
said no FIR could be filed against them because they were judges. This
happened in the Ghaziabad Provident Fund case as well. The
investigation is stumped because the CJI hasn’t given permission. We
have to get rid of this injunction.
The third problem is the Contempt of Court Act. Today, even if you
expose a judge with evidence, you run the risk of contempt. Judges are
even seeking to insulate themselves from the RTI. We have to get rid
of the Contempt of Court Act – not the whole Act. Disobeying the
orders of the court is civil contempt – that should remain.
Interfering with the administration of justice is criminal contempt –
that too should remain. What needs to be deleted is the clause about
scandalising or lowering the dignity of the court, for which Arundhati
Roy was sent to jail. Finally, there is the problem of appointments.
Earlier, judicial appointments were made by the government, which was
bad enough. Now, by a sleight of hand, the Supreme Court has taken the
power of appointments to itself. Earlier there were political
considerations; now there are nepotistic ones.
Again, what’s the answer to that?
We need an independent Judicial Appointments Commission, which is
independent and works full time, and follows some systems and
procedures. Eligibility lists should be prepared and comparative
merits debated and evaluated. You can’t just pick judges arbitrarily,
and let people know about it only after the deed is done.
There is still no independent body to process complaints and action
against judges
What are the best practices and conventions elsewhere?
We should at least have Public Confirmation hearings like in the US.
In the Senate Judicial Committee, you have hearings where any public
citizen can give evidence about the background of a judge that has
bearing on their appointment. This is being fiercely resisted here.
Do any counter arguments hold?
None that I can see. The judges say all this will compromise their
independence. Unfortunately, they are equating the independence of the
judiciary with independence from accountability. Independence of the
judiciary was meant to be independence from the political
establishment, not from all accountability.
Are there other ways in which judicial corruption manifests itself?
There are so many. There is Justice Kapadia who decided on the
Niyamgiri mining lease case in Orissa. He said Vedanta can’t be given
the lease because it’s been blacklisted by the Norwegian government;
but its subsidiary company Sterlite can get the lease because it is a
publicly listed company. Justice Kapadia said it’s publicly listed
because he had shares in it and yet he passed an order in favour of
Sterlite! There is a law against judges hearing cases where there is a
conflict of interest, but they just bypass it and you can’t complain
because that would be contempt.
WRITER’S EMAIL
sh...@tehelka.com


From Tehelka Magazine, Vol 6, Issue 35, Dated September 05, 2009






Burn After Reading
BRIJESH PANDEY and SANJAY DUBEY track the Supreme Court’s lack of
urgency in investigating charges of judicial corruption
THE STORY OF A QUIET BURIAL?
Special CBI judge Rama Jain uncovers Rs 7 crore Provident Fund scam
during vigilance inquiry
Accused Ashutosh Asthana revealed that he was paying off 36 judges
including a sitting Supreme Court judge and 11 High Court judges
Supreme Court directs CBI to investigate, permits interrogation of all
involved judges
Several status reports given by the CBI to the apex court
Reports kept secret. Action taken on basis of reports unknown
WHEN SPECIAL CBI judge Rama Jain received an anonymous letter in
January 2008, telling her that the provident funds of Class 3 and
Class 4 employees of the Ghaziabad court were being siphoned off, she
had no idea that she had stumbled onto the biggest judicial scam in
the history of independent India.
As she was the designated vigilance officer at the Ghaziabad court,
she first conducted an inquiry on her own, which uncovered the
involvement of at least three judges and the Central Nazir in the
embezzlement of funds. She reported the matter to the Allahabad High
Court, which, in turn, ordered a vigilance inquiry. Holding that the
report, prima facie, had merit, the court directed her to file an FIR.
Central Nazir Ashutosh Asthana was arrested on the basis of the FIR on
April 10, 2008. His interrogation revealed that Asthana was not a solo
player. He claimed that he was first introduced to the scam by a
district judge himself. What followed was so shocking that even the
Ghaziabad police was on the backfoot. Asthana confessed that from the
Rs 7 crore embezzled, he had given cash and gifts such as
airconditioners, refrigerators, expensive clothes, jewellery and
furniture to as many as 36 judges, including about 10 High Court
judges and one Supreme Court judge. In a sworn statement before a
magistrate, Asthana revealed that this fraud had run from 2001 to 2007
with the active connivance of district judges. Every month, Asthana
even paid bribes to various judges, from Rs 25,000 to a whopping Rs
1.5 lakh.
When these excerpts from Asthana’s confession became public, the
public image of the judiciary touched a new low. In perhaps the
biggest moment of crisis for the Indian judiciary, Asthana, the main
accused, has in turn named judges from the Ghaziabad District Court to
the Allahabad High Court, right up to the Supreme Court. This was not
all.
These revelations stunned the Ghaziabad police. Clearly out of their
depth and (justifiably) wary of taking on the powerful judiciary, they
requested the Ghaziabad court to hand over the probe to the CBI. In
September 2008, the Supreme Court transferred the case to the CBI, but
with a rider: Investigate, but give us a sealed report. The PF scam,
as it had come to be known, gave the judiciary a wonderful opportunity
to redeem itself in the eyes of the people but the case remained
shrouded in secrecy. Cynics then said that the whole matter would be
given a quiet burial. Eighteen months after the scam became public and
four CBI status reports later, the cynics appear to have had the last
laugh.


This delay and secrecy in such a highprofile scam raises various
uncomfortable questions for the Indian Judiciary. Legal luminaries
believe that this is symptomatic of a larger malaise which ails the
judiciary. Says jurist Ram Jethmalani, “The reputation of a judge is
more important than the actual fact of his honesty. In fact, if a
judge has a bad reputation, even if it is undeserved, he should not be
appointed because then nobody will have confidence in his judgements,”
adding, “When the judiciary expedites cases concerning the executive
branch or even most prominent cases, why is such urgency not displayed
here, when the matter is extremely serious. Why this delay?”
For six years, funds worth Rs 7 crore were embezzled and judges were
allegedly bribed
A VALID QUESTION. Asthana named 36 judges (a list of which is with
TEHELKA). Other than the fact that a few have retired, virtually
nothing is known about the fate of the judges of the Allahabad High
Court and the Supreme Court judge. Whether or not the apex court is
planning to initiate or has initiated, criminal charges against any of
the judges — sitting or retired — are questions that only the Supreme
Court can answer.
And the apex court should answer, argues former Union law minister and
senior advocate Shanti Bhushan. “I don’t appreciate this sealed-cover
business except in very rare cases when making something public might
be detrimental to the public interest — mainly if there is an army
secret. Whether it is the judiciary or the executive, all officers are
appointed on the behalf of the people. It is on the people’s behalf
that the judiciary exercises its powers. How can you keep
investigations in the PF scam secret? The people have every right to
know what is going on.”
VN Khare, former Chief Justice of India, concurs. “These kind of
things should not be allowed to linger. This shakes the confidence of
the people in the judiciary. If there is an allegation or misconduct,
it must be inquired into immediately and strict action should be taken
against the erring judges. Why should the reputation of most judges
suffer for no fault of theirs?”

When the judiciary expedites cases concerning the executive branch or
even most prominent cases, why is such urgency not being displayed in
this matter?
RAM JETHMALANI, Jurist
The biggest question which arises from this scam is the lack of will
on the part of the judiciary to rein in errant judges. Let alone the
judges named by Asthana, what about the fate of the three Ghaziabad
District Judges named by vigilance officer of the district court
Special CBI Judge Rama Jain herself? Legal luminaries say this
hesitancy on the part of judges to act against fellow judges involved
in wrongdoing clearly illustrates the prevailing mindset of the
judiciary.
“I know of a retired Chief Justice of India who is one of the most
honest judges I have ever seen. It’s difficult to imagine a more
honest person. However, when a responsible minister made complaints to
him against a corrupt High Court Judge, he did not grant permission
for an investigation because he felt that as the head of the judicial
family, it was his job to protect judges, be they corrupt or not,”
says Shanti Bhushan. Ram Jethmalani chips in sarcastically, “This is
the reason why judges call each other ‘brother judge.’”
IT IS not only cases like the PF scam which taints the image of the
judiciary, but also the extreme reluctance on the part of the
judiciary to be open and transparent. Reams and reams of paper have
gone towards pious exhortations by the judiciary asking the government
to refrain from corruption and work in an efficient manner. But sadly,
no judge has held forth at length on the need for the judiciary to
refrain from corruption. Even attempts to exercise the Right to
Information with respect to the office of the CJI came a cropper as
the CJI’s office was always declared out of bounds. It took a historic
verdict by the Delhi High Court to declare that the office of the CJI
was not immune from accountability and outside the purview of the RTI
Act. Senior lawyers and retired chief justices feel that if the
judiciary is not transparent or accountable, it only means that they
are trying to hide something. Justice Khare feels, “Judges are more
accountable than other persons because they hold a very high post. The
very existence of the judiciary is based on the faith of the common
man in it. If that faith is not there, how can the judiciary
function?”
No judge holds forth at length on the need for the judiciary to
refrain from corruption
What incenses them is the behaviour of the government with regard to
the Judges’ Assets Declaration Bill which the government tried to
introduce in 2009. The opposition erupted in protest and forced the
government to defer the bill. Jethmalani terms the government’s
approach to this bill as a “conspiracy of corruption”. “The government
is scared to take on the judiciary. It’s clear that the executive
wants to cosy up to the judiciary.” Agrees retired CJI V N Khare, “Why
should there be any hesitancy to declare assets at all on the part of
judiciary? The whole episode is beyond me.” In a recent development,
the Supreme Court has reiterated before the Delhi High Court that the
CJI’s office is outside the purview of the RTI Act.

Corruption charges are swept under the carpet by the judiciary. But
this has given a shield of total immunity to the judges, who think
they can get away with anything
SHANTI BHUSHAN, Former law minister
Another assault on the public image of the judiciary is the Dinakaran
episode. Currently, judges are appointed to the Supreme Court by the
Supreme Court Collegium, a group of judges chaired by the Chief
Justice of India. When Chief Justice Dinakaran of the Karnataka High
Court was elevated to the Supreme Court, the state Bar and legal
luminaries rose up in protest because the Collegium appeared to have
dismissed, or, at least, not have considered the serious allegations
of corruption against him. According to Senior Advocate Soli Sorabjee,
“The Dinakaran episode shows that the Collegium is not working
satisfactorily. You must have a national commission for judges which
should be made up of judges, eminent jurists and senior government
officials. This council should have the power to get independent
information and evaluate it.” Shanti Bhushan feels that as judges are
extremely busy with hearing cases, there should be a full-time
commission whose sole function is to pick judges for the High Court
and the Supreme Court and feels that the commission should also have
its own bureau of investigation. They should not be dependent on
either the local police, who might be afraid to investigate judges, or
on an overburdened CBI.
But all this is very hard to achieve. Jurists feel that the judges of
the higher courts have converted themselves into a union of sorts and
are trying to protect each other. “Their approach is to sweep every
allegation under the carpet. Don’t allow the public to know about it.
Let the public believe that our judiciary is very honest. But this has
been counterproductive. It has given a shield of total immunity to the
judges and they think they can get away with anything. This has led to
an increase in corruption in the judiciary,” states Shanti Bhushan.
Time and again, opportunities have arisen for the judiciary to
reinvent itself in a new avatar. And time after time, it has failed.
Caesar’s wife, they say, should be above suspicion. Whatever the cost
it might take to ensure it.
WRITERS’ EMAIL
bri...@tehelka.com
san...@tehelka.com


From Tehelka Magazine, Vol 6, Issue 41, Dated October 17, 2009




‘Half of last 16 chief justices have been corrupt’
By churumuri

Judicial corruption is a bull few in India are willing to attach their
names to. There are whispers of this or that sitting judge making
piles or cash; of sons, daughters and other near and dear ones acting
as “brokers” for cases, deals, etc, but none of those allegations see
the light of day.
Not because the media is a willing accomplice but because of the sword
of “contempt of court” hanging over us.
For long, truth was not, repeat not, a defence in the case of
contempt. Although that is now no longer the case, judicial
corruption still isn’t headline news like corruption in other spheres
of Indian life. The case of Justice P.D. Dinakaran is one of the rare
exceptions and that too only in sections of the media.
In September 2009, the Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan, in an
interview to Shoma Chaudhury of Tehelkamagazine, said “half of the
last 16 chief justices were corrupt”. The comment invited the apex
court’s contempt. Now, Bhushan’s father, the noted jurist Shanti
Bhushan has joined issue.
In his application before the Supreme Court praying for his
impleadment as respondent No.3 in the case of the Amicus Curiae vs
Prashant Bhushan, Bhushan senior repeats his son’s charge that eight
out of the last 16 CJs were corrupt, even going so far as to deliver
the names of the corrupt in a sealed cover.
“In the applicant’s opinion, eight [of the last 16 chief justices]
were definitely corrupt, six were definitely honest and about the
remaining two, a definite opinion cannot be expressed whether they
were honest or corrupt.”
Below is the full text of Shanti Bhushan’s application, published in
the public interest.
***
To
The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India &
His companion justices of the Supreme Court of India
The humble application of the Petitioners above named.
Most respectfully showeth:
1. That the applicant is filing the present application for his
impleadment as Respondent No. 3 in the aforementioned contempt
petition as the applicant is making a categorical statement in the
present application that eight of the last sixteen Chief Justices of
India were definitely corrupt and also providing the names of those
eight definitely corrupt Chief Justices in a sealed cover as an
annexure along with the present application.
2. The applicant is a practicing advocate who was enrolled on 8 July
1948. He has appeared in each and every High Court in the country. He
is well acquainted with the manner in which the Indian judiciary has
been functioning and how its character has been changing over the
years.
3. That the applicant has been a part of the campaign for judicial
accountability since its inception in the year 1990.
4. That there was a time when it was almost impossible even to think
that a judge of a High court or the Supreme Court could be corrupt.
Things have changed drastically during the last 2 or 3 decades during
which corruption has been growing in the Indian judiciary. So much so
that even a sitting Chief Justice of India had to openly admit that
20% of the judges could be corrupt. Very recently in March 2010 a
sitting Chief Justice of a high court openly made a statement. The
statement of the sitting chief justice was published by the Times of
India in its issue of 6th march 2010 with the headlines, “In our
judiciary, anybody can be bought, says Gujarat chief justice”. A copy
of the news paper report is being annexed hereto as Annexure A.
5. That the applicant believes that the reported statement may not be
correctly reflecting the perception of the Gujarat Chief Justice,
since he should be knowing as the applicant does that there are and
have always been plenty of totally honest judges, but they are also
becoming the victim of this public perception since no institution of
governance in the country is taking any effective steps about dealing
with corruption in the judiciary.
6. That India became a republic in 1950, when the people became
sovereign. They got the right to constitute their institutions, the
executive, the legislature and the judiciary, to serve them, who would
be accountable to them.
7. That before 1950, corruption was almost non existent in the High
Courts. The federal court had in 1949 got Justice Shiv Prasad Sinha
removed from the Allahabad High Court, merely on the finding that he
had passed 2 judicial orders on extra judicial considerations.
8. That it however appears that thereafter the judiciary has adopted
the policy of sweeping all allegations of judicial corruption under
the carpet in the belief that such allegations might tarnish the image
of the judiciary. It does not realize that this policy has played a
big role in increasing judicial corruption.
9. That the Constitution prescribed removal by impeachment as the only
way of removing judges who commit misconduct since it was believed at
the time of the framing of the Constitution that misconduct by judges
of the higher judiciary would be very rare. However those expectations
have been belied as is apparent from the surfacing of a series of
judicial scandals in the recent past. The case of Justice V. Ramaswami
and subsequent attempts to impeach other judges have shown that this
is an impractical and difficult process to deal with corrupt judges.
The practical effect of this has been to instill a feeling of impunity
among judges who feel that they cannot be touched even if they
misconduct.
10. That corruption by judges is a cognizable offence. The Code of
Criminal Procedure requires that whenever an FIR is filed with respect
to a cognizable offence, it is the statutory duty of the police to
investigate the offence. The police has to collect evidence against
the accused and charge-sheet him in a competent court. He would then
be tried and punished by being sent to jail. The Supreme Court has
however by violating this statutory provision in the CrPC given a
direction in its Constitution bench judgement in theVeeraswamy case of
1991 that no FIR would be registered against any judge without the
permission of the Chief Justice of India. In not a single case has any
such permission ever been granted for the registration of an FIR
against any judge after that judgement.
11. That the result of this direction has been that a total immunity
has been given to corrupt judges against their prosecution. No wonder
that judicial corruption has increased by leaps and bounds.
12. That an honest judiciary enjoying public confidence is an
imperative for the functioning of a democracy, and it is the duty of
every right thinking person to strive to achieve this end.
13. That unless the level of corruption in the judiciary is exposed
and brought in the public domain, the institutions of governance
cannot be activated to take effective measures to eliminate this evil.
14. That it is the common perception that whenever such efforts are
made by anyone, the judiciary tries to target him by the use of the
power of contempt. It is the reputation of the judge which is his
shield against any malicious and false allegations against him. He
doesn’t need the power of contempt to protect his reputation and
credibility.
15. That the applicant strongly believes that a responsible citizen
should be prepared to undergo any amount of suffering in the pursuit
of the noble cause of fighting for a clean judiciary.
16. That there are two statements of Respondent no. 1 (Prashant
Bhushan) published in Tehelka by Respondent no. 2 which are alleged to
constitute contempt of court. In the 1st statement, Respondent no. 1
has expressed that in his view, out of the last 16 or 17 chief
justices of India, half have been corrupt.
17. The applicant states that in his view too this statement is
absolutely correct. At the time of the publication of this report in
Tehelka, the last 16 Chief Justices of India were the
following: 1. Justice Ranganath Mishra,
2. Justice K.N. Singh,
3. Justice M.H. Kania,
4. Justice L.M. Sharma,
5. Justice M.N. Venkatchalliah,
6. Justice A.M. Ahmadi,
7. Justice J.S. Verma,
8. Justice M.M. Punchhi,
9. Justice A.S. Anand,
10. Justice S.P. Bharucha,
11. Justice B.N. Kripal,
12. Justice G.B. Patnaik,
13. Justice Rajendra Babu,
14. Justice R. C. Lahoti,
15. Justice V.N. Khare,
16. Justice Y.K SabharwalOut of these, in the applicant’s opinion,
eight were definitely corrupt, six were definitely honest and about
the remaining two, a definite opinion cannot be expressed whether they
were honest or corrupt. The signed lists identifying these eight, six
and two Chief Justices of India are being enclosed in a sealed cover
which is being annexed here to as Annexure B.
18. That in fact two former chief justices of India had personally
told the applicant while they were in office that their immediate
predecessor and immediate successor were corrupt judges. The names of
these four Chief Justices of India are included in the list of the 8
corrupt Chief Justices of India.
19. That since the applicant is publicly stating that out of the last
sixteen Chief Justices of India, eight of them were definitely
corrupt, the applicant also needs to be added as a respondent to this
contempt petition so that he is also suitably punished for this
contempt. The applicant would consider it a great honour to spend time
in jail for making an effort to get for the people of India an honest
and clean judiciary.
20. That the applicant also submits that since the questions arising
in this case affects the judiciary as a whole, the petition needs to
be decided by the entire court and not merely by three judges
handpicked by a Chief Justice.
PRAYERS
In view of the above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble
Court may be pleased to:
1. allow the present application and implead the Applicant as a
contemnor in the aforementioned contempt petition as Respondent no. 3;
and
2. pass any other or further order/s as this Hon’ble Court may deem
fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(Shanti Bhushan)
applicant-in-person
New Delhi
***
Photograph: courtesy Shailendra Pandey/ Tehelka
***
Full coverage: The strange case of Justice P.D. Dinakaran
CHURUMURI POLL: Is Dalit Dinakaran above the law?
If he is unfit for Supreme Court, how is he fit for Karnataka HC?
If he is unfit for Supreme Court, how is he fit for Karnataka HC—II?
‘Integrity + competence + judicial temperament’
Yella not OK, but Supreme Court silent yaake?
The brazen conduct of Justice Dinakaran
The strange case of Justice Dinakaran (continued)
Audi alteram partem? Hear the other side out?
CHURUMURI POLL: Will Justice Dinakaran be impeached?
Is CJI K.G. Balakrishnan right about P.D. Dinakaran?
CHURUMURI POLL: Is Dinakaran fit for Sikkim HC?
CHURUMURI POLL: P.D. Dinakaran vs D.V. Shylendra Kumar
Is Sikkim HC’s dignity less than that of Karnataka’s?




edited , printed , published & owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 ,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE ,
LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL , MYSORE -570017 INDIA cell : 09341820313
home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarionofdalit/
,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/eclarionofdalit/ ,
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit

e-mail : nagar...@hotmail.com , nag...@yahoo.com