Taxability as perquisite of Transport facility provided to an employee from his residence to office and vice- versa

228 views
Skip to first unread message

P.D.RUNGTA

unread,
Sep 7, 2009, 2:41:59 AM9/7/09
to eserve...@googlegroups.com

Taxability as perquisite of Transport facility provided to an employee from his residence to office and vice- versa

SUMMARY OF CASE LAW

Transport facility provided to an employee from his residence to office and office to residence is not a perquisite within the meaning of section 17(2) of IT Act, 1961.

CASE LAW DETAILS

Decided by: ITAT, MUMBAI BENCH `G’, MUMBAI,  In The case of: WNS Global  services Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO , Appeal No.:,ITA NO. 319/Mum./2007 , Decided on: July 30, 2009.

RELEVENT PARAGRAPH

8. Having heard both the parties and having considered their rival contentions, let us consider the relevant provisions of law.

[a] We find that the term ‘income’ has been defined in sec.2[24] to include the value of any perquisite or profits in lieu of salary taxable under clauses [2] and [3] of section 17.

[b] Sec.17 defines ’salary’, ‘perquisites’ and ‘profits in lieu of salary’ and clause [2] thereafter defines the term ‘perquisites’ to include the value of any benefit or amenity granted or provided free of cost or at concessional rate by a company to an employee who is a director thereof, or an employee being a person who has a substantial interest in the company or an employee to whom provisions of paragraphs [a] and [b] of this sub-clause do not apply and whose income under the head ’salaries’ exclusive of the value of all benefits or amenities not provided for by way of monetary payment, exceeds fifty thousand rupees.

[c] The explanation to clause [2] provides that “For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the use of any vehicle provided by a company or an employer for journey by the assessee from his residence to his office or other place of work, or from such office or place to his residence, shall not be regarded as a benefit or amenity granted or provided to him free of cost or at concessional rate for the purposes of this sub-clause.”

[d] Section 10 provides for the incomes which do not form part of total income, and cl.[i] of sub-sec.[14] of sec. 10 provides that any such special allowance or benefit, not being in the nature of a perquisite within the meaning of clause [2] of sec. 17, specifically granted to meet expenses wholly, necessarily and exclusively incurred in the performance of the duties of an office or employment of profit, to the extent to which such expenses are actually incurred for that purposes; and clause [ii]- provides that any such allowance granted for the-assessee either to meet his personal expenses at the place where the duties of his office or employment of profit are ordinarily performed by him or at the place where he ordinarily resides, or to compensate him for the increased cost of firing.

9. From the above provisions, it is clear that what is exempt u/s.10[14] of the Act is an allowance or benefit which is granted to meet expenses wholly, necessarily and exclusively for the performance of duties of an office or employment of profit. The perquisites within the meaning of cl. [ii] of sec. 17 is excluded from the exemption clause. Sec.l7[2] gives the meaning of perquisites and sub-sec.[3] thereof provides for the value of any benefit or amenity granted or provided free of cost or at a concessional rate to an employee. This perquisite has to be considered as part of the income of the assessee. However, Explanation [iii] of sub-sec.[2] of sec.17 clearly provides that the use of any vehicle provided by an employer to an employee for purposes of performance of his duties or for journey from his residence to his office or vise versa shall not be regarded as benefit or amenity granted or provided to him free of cost at a concessional rate for the purposes of this clause. Therefore, the transportation facilities provided by an employer to an employee from his residence to office and office to residence is not a perquisite within the meaning of sub-sec.[2] of section 17.

 



--
With Regards:-

CA.P D RUNGTA
M.COM., LL.B.,AICWA.,FCA.,DISA (ICAI)
P D RUNGTA & CO.,
Chartered Accountants

21,HEMANT BASU SARANI, 3RD FL.,R.NO. 317 ,KOLKATA 700 001 ,PH:033 3028 2500 (4 LINES) CELL: 9831007253 ,web:www.pdrungta.co.in

Disclaimer: The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. We attempt to scan e-mails and attachments for viruses, however, it does not guarantee that either are virus free and that we accept no liability for any damage sustained as a result of VIRUSES.

NOTE: Please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary. Please encourage environmental awareness.

dineshs...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 5, 2014, 5:46:33 AM9/5/14
to foru...@googlegroups.com, eserve...@googlegroups.com
Dear Sir,

thank you very much for the information.

if suppose company is making transport expenses (local) reimbursement in cash or cheque. then how we calculate the perquisites.
as this is the part of CTC. will this make any difference if paid in cash or cheque?.

regards 
dinesh somani 

Kalidas Ramaswami

unread,
Sep 8, 2014, 2:23:20 AM9/8/14
to foru...@googlegroups.com, eserve...@googlegroups.com
It does not matter whether payment is by cheque or by cash.conveyance allowance to the extent notified will be exempt u/s 10(14).
regards
kalidas
 

Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 02:46:33 -0700
From: dineshs...@gmail.com
To: foru...@googlegroups.com
CC: eserve...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [CA RUNGTA PD] Re: Taxability as perquisite of Transport facility provided to an employee from his residence to office and vice- versa
--
forum4ca is a Google Group of eServe online for the benefit of CA and other professionals. It is especially meant for written discussion & circulate information within group members. The mail may contain such research/advice/opinion/information/fact provided by any member and are subject to the accuracy and of the description of facts.The forum4ca, do not claim that contains in mail/information obtained after reading as a complete and accurate disclosure of relevant facts. Further this Group’s Owner/Moderator/Member are not liable for any damages or costs suffered due to action/transaction based on information on this Group.
 
To join and/or to post to this group send email: foru...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to:forum4ca+u...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at:http://groups.google.co.in/group/forum4ca or www.eserveonline.net

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "forum4ca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to forum4ca+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages