The
report is jubilee by the grand opera of Forensic Audit. The Monarch 2015-16 was having
obsequious piper, hoax, renegade, pony, junto rhapsodize, wishfulserpent and
orchestra. The Audit Report is edict and hymn.
v An abstract of E Mail of CA Prakash
Kulakarni dt. 28.11.2015 [Page No. 1 of Enclosure Volume I of the Forensic
Audit Report] is reproduced as follows:-
xxxx
xxxx
During our visit, CA Manoj Agrawal,
CA Vishwajeet Singh, CA Sudeshna Basu, CA Rahul Kumar Singh & CA Rajat
Mehra have orally given information about the building project, on their own
record. We have informed these members that we will ask for written statements
from them in due course of our audit.
We
have obtained copies of certain documents & information from the branch,
which is being analysed by us.
xxxx
xxxx
A)
There
is significant variation in the value of building/cost of construction arrived
at by the two valuers whose reports are on record.
B)
There
are differences in measurement of construction area as calculated by the two
valuers & CA Rajat Mehra, who has submitted a separate report of his
enquiry.
xxx
xxxx
one the back ground of variation in
the value of building & physical measurements, we strongly recommend that an independent civil engineer be appointed
by the Institute to assess the actual cost of building as constructed and its’ comparison
with as per financial records. Besides other things, the civil engineer
would also examine the correctness of rates applied while making payments.
xxxx
xxxx
v The key point is what was the
relevance of the oral statement of CA Manoj Agrawal, CA Vishwajeet Singh, CA Sudeshna
Basu, when they were not the part of building project under consideration
during 2011 to Feb. 2013 [while they
were possessing the entire correspondences and records in the Branch], but
why the records from Head Office were not asked/called. However, their statement
was honored being evidence because of
botany of marionette.
v The entire audit was based on
certain documents and information provided by CA Manoj Agrawal, CA Vishwajeet
Singh, CA Sudeshna Basu.
v The question is who appoint the valuer.
One was who made the allegations i.e. CA Manoj Agrawal, CA Vishwajeet Singh, CA
Sudeshna Basu, so the valuation was fraudulent
one. However, the auditor has no option because the entire audit was done
phantasmally based on prescription given by the leeches who converted Varanasi
as a political harbour.
v The question is why the Monarch
after taking the charge in Feb. 12, 2013 did not appoint any valuer immediately
but pushed the building [which was
nearest to finish] into scrapped
condition by employing necromancy. He was providing free play ground for
pythoness who was reddle of the Jehovah [Monarch
2015-16]. Really the report is wanton, vallain, renegation, unscriptural,
unsanctified but a wand to flick.
v In the E Mail dt. 11.12.2015 the
learned Auditor stated as follows:-
xxxx
xxxx
3. we have tried to obtain copies of
emails received & sent by Varanasi Branch from/to RBA Dept. of ICAI HO in
connection with the Building roject. However,
we are not sure whether all the emails sent by/received by ICAI HO have been
made available to us. In view of the same, you are requested to arrange to make available soft copies of emails
sent by and received by ICAI HO (either RBA or other authorities) from
Varanasi Branch or its office bearers on the subject of Building Project.
Copies of emails from 2011 till date should be provided to us.
xxxx
xxxx
v The reply of the learned Secretary
Audit Committee is as follows:-
xxxx
xxxx
3.
We are directing the branch to provide you copies of all official communications
between the branch and HO from 2011 till date.
xxxx
xxxx
[refer Page No. 3 of Enclosure
Volume I of the Forensic Audit Report]
v Really, the Audit Committee Secretary was quaker of the Monarch 2015-16. The
reply was strange but rattan of the Jehovah [Monarch] 2015-16.
v Though the Forensic Auditor is employed being kea but he forget that members are not sheep. The Forensic
Audit Report is the romance, crystal-lens for the Jehovah [Monarch] 2015-16, the libel but being crystal-lens to panegyrist for him, it
is luciferous to lieutenant but a lemonade for the Crown Emperor [Monarch]
2015-16. The photograph speaks that the junto like CA Manoj Agrawal, CA
Vishwajeet Singh, CA Sudeshna Basu, CA Shree Prakash Panday & CA Vinay
Kumar Agarwal are liege pursuivant of
the Xangti [i.e. Monarch 2015-16].
CA Ravi Holani Mb No:-
9425109183,
9425115728 0751-2365815 20, Pandit vihar Colony Gola Ka Mandir Gwalior
CA. Manoj Agrawal and CA. Vinay Kumar Agrawal,
partner of CA. Sanjay Kant presenting records and complaining against the
Institute to the Minister CA. PiyushGoyal