Sir,
The gap should not be less than 90 days. I don't think there any drafting error in this aspect .
Regards,
Please correct me if I am wrong but I understand that the provision requires that the gap should exceed or equal 90 days.
So, sufficient compliance can be done in such case where Board Meetings are held in (say) April and September in case of small company.
Regards,
Vishal Agarwal
Dear Vishal ji,As per section 173(5), the gap between two Board Meetings should not be more than 90 days. This practically makes aa mokery of the same sub-section, permitting one meeting in each half of the calender year.
Regards,Manoj Sethia, FCA,ACS,ACMAM.Sethia & Co.Chartered Accountants3,Bentinck Street (2nd Floor)Kolkata - 700 001Ph : +91 33 65366663, 22100875Cell : +919830553604Mail : mset...@gmail.com"It is not in the stars to hold our destiny but in ourselves"
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Vishal Agarwal <vishalag...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks & Regards,Your opinions in the matter would be highly appreciated.Respected Professionals,
This is further to fact that the company had held a Board Meeting in between 01st Jan 2014 to 31st March 2014 and thereby sufficiently complied with 173(5) requiring a Board Meeting to be held in first half of the calendar year.
Pursuant to Sec 173(5) of Companies Act, 2013 , can a private limited company having paid up capital upto Rs. 50 Lakhs ( thereby being a small company) hold its first Board Meeting on 29 August 2014 and file MGT 14 ,disclosing Directors interest, within 30 days therefrom without attracting liability to pay additional fees or contravening the law ?
--