Dear Colleagues,
As promised to
get this out asap.
As discussed
last week:
Optimization of
the source disk size as part of importing on OCP - this will help us saving
storage costs as most of the legacy has massive allocated sizes which are
under utilized.
Noted.
Included in the June planning deck for discussion.
Golden image -
container images of standard operating systems e.g. container image for
Windows 2012 R2 which everyone can use. This will also enable efficient
GitOps.
I see this as a good proposal. I will review with users. Adding a note in June planning discussion.
Good news from
26/05:
Miguel spent 1.5
hours with us yesterday and helped us making Konveyor (upstream) work on
OCP 4.6. Thanks to Miguel. We will do the same with supported MTV on OCP
4.7.
Blog from yesterday's
work: https://er-vishalanand.medium.com/zero-touch-rehosting-of-legacy-monolith-applications-to-openshift-container-platform-in-bulk-9611de15f53b
Thanks for the blog post!. Nice read. I wish many others in the migration space would read it.
Adding +Michelle Nicosia for awareness.
Other thoughts:
Konveyor does
not give us option to customize cpu and memory as auto-import used to give
us that option. This may limit our capability to optimize infra resources
while rehosting. Is there an option ?
Currently the option is not there.
Other operating
systems rehosting template support on OpenShift Virtualization e.g.
Ubuntu, CentOS etc. fails importing - any suggestions ?
Please wait for the release of Forklift 2.0 and MTV 2.0 and try again.
Also, if you want to take over some issues and submit Pull Requests ... you will be more than welcomed! 😁
Support of RHEL
(7,8,9) and Windows (2012R2, 16, 19, 10) is good but limits our capability
to rehost other OS / VMs running on the source legacy side - any suggestions
?
We can keep working on that. Feel free to open another thread, in forklift-dev, to discuss the details.
How about having
Analysis toolkit (call it ATV) - this should gives us some view on MTV
UI on the source allocation vs utlization vs to-be allocated ?
Is ATV an existing tool?
If so, is it open-source or can it become open-source? Could we review it?
Warm regards !
Best regards,
Vishal Anand,
M*
Thought
Leader Architect (IBM Certified)
IBM
Sr. Inventor, Member of the IBM Academy of Technology, IBM IDT Member
Email:vian...@ie.ibm.com
Mobile: +353 87 4001 299
Technology
Campus, Damastown Industrial Estate, Mulhuddart, Dublin 15 - Ireland.