Food prices driven up by global warming

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Chape...@aol.com

unread,
May 10, 2011, 2:27:30 PM5/10/11
to CJoh...@mpr.org, tker...@mchsi.com, heerm...@yahoo.com, mooseho...@yahoo.com, alf...@aol.com, ptrs...@netscape.net, simm...@comcast.net, pme...@mpr.org, mnsp...@hotmail.com, stsi...@hotmail.com, RRB...@attglobal.net, rrb...@attglobal.net, BBerg...@aol.com, tl...@lahey.com, hsh...@aol.com, wa...@comcast.net, je...@stewart.incline-village.nv.us, forestry-f...@googlegroups.com
 

Food prices driven up by global warming, study shows

Scientists warn that farming practices must be adapted to a warmer world and rises in global population

water crisis, california, drought, wheat crops
Food prices have risen 20%, say scientists, as warmer temperatures cause dehydration and prevent pollination in crop plants. Photograph: David McNew/Getty Images

Global warming has already harmed the world's food production and has driven up food prices by as much as 20% over recent decades, new research has revealed.

The drop in the productivity of crop plants around the world was not caused by changes in rainfall but was because higher temperatures can cause dehydration, prevent pollination and lead to slowed photosynthesis.

Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute, Washington DC, said the findings indicate a turning point: "Agriculture as it exists today evolved over 11,000 years of reasonably stable climate, but that climate system is no more." Adaptation is difficult because our knowledge of the future is not strong enough to drive new investments, he said, "so we just keep going, hoping for the best."

The scientists say their work shows how crucial it is to find ways to adapt farming to a warmer world, to ensure that rises in global population are matched by rising food production. "It is vital," said Wolfram Schlenker, at Columbia University in New York and one of the research team. "If we continue to have the same seed varieties and temperatures continue to rise, then food prices will rise further. [Addressing] that is the big question."

The new research joins a small number of studies in which the fingerprint of climate change has been separated from natural variations in weather and other factors, demonstrating that the effects of warming have already been felt in the world. Scientists have shown that the chance of the severe heatwave that killed thousands in Europe in 2003 was made twice as likely by global warming, while other work showed that the floods that caused £3.5bn of damage in England in 2000 were made two to three times more likely.

Food prices have reached new record highs this year, and have been implicated as a trigger for unrest in the Middle East and Africa. A rising appetite for meat is a critical factor, said Wolfram. "We actually have enough calories to feed the world quite comfortably, the problem is meat is really inefficient," as many kilogrammes of grain are needed to produce one kilogramme of meat, he said. "As countries get richer and have a preference for meat, which is more expensive, they price people in poorer countries out of the market."

"The research provides evidence of big shifts in wheat and maize production," commented Prof Tim Wheeler at the Walker Institute for Climate System Research, Reading University, UK, who added it had involved "heroic" statistical analysis. But he said that, while long-term climate change impacts were another pressure on food prices, short-term price spikes were linked to extreme weather events, such as the Russian heatwaves and wildfires in 2010.

The study, published in the journal Science, examined how rising temperatures affected the annual crop yields of all major producer nations between 1980 and 2008. Computer models were used to show how much grain would have been harvested in the absence of warming. Overall, yields have been rising over the last decades and the models took this into account. The scientists found that global wheat production was 33m tonnes (5.5%) lower than it would have been without warming and maize production was 23m tonnes (3.8%) lower. Specific countries fared worse than the average, with Russia losing 15% of its potential wheat crop, and Brazil, Mexico and Italy suffering above average losses. Some countries experienced lower production of rice and soybeans, although these drops were offset by gains in other countries.

The losses drove up food prices by as much as 18.9%, the team calculated, although the rise could be as low as 6.4% if the increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere strongly boosts plant growth and yields - a factor that is not well understood by scientists.

Global food prices have risen by about 200% in recent years, says Schlenker. Other causes of the rise are the increased demand for meat and the diversion of food into biofuels. Nonetheless, the researchers conclude that the negative impact on crops overall is "likely to be incurring large economic and health costs".

The US, which has the world's largest share of overall production, stood out in the analysis because it appears to have lost no production to climate change as yet. Schlenker said this was because the rise in temperature there was very small compared to other parts of the world. This was perhaps due simply to luck with the weather, or the cooling influence of aerosol particles, such as soot, that blocks warming.

"US farmers are having a good time in the sense that their yields have not been impacted much and prices have been pretty high, so for them it has been pretty profitable," he said. "But most climate models predict that eventually the US will warm."

Adapting farming to climate change could involved moving to cooler areas as existing areas warm, said Schlenker, but often soils are poorer in the new locations. He highlighted the potential of biotechnology - genetic engineering - to develop new crop varieties that are more resistant to heat, but said the potential remains unproven. "What happens over the next 20 years depends on how optimistic you are about finding those extra ways of adapting."

lrl...@aol.com

unread,
May 10, 2011, 3:56:44 PM5/10/11
to forestry-f...@googlegroups.com
Roy,

I usually enjoy most of what you post, but the article below is nothing more than BS.  

You should be ashamed of yourself.  Global warming, whether AGW or natural, is not driving global food prices, period.

Perhaps global demand to use food crops for other than food has more influence on prices.

Anyway, the real world trumps global warming any day; as a cause for anything !  We have way too many people on this globe trying to achieve the same thing...

Some will win, some will loose...  Nothing has changed for thousands of years.

No, the sky is not falling...

Larry

Lawrence Lake, RPF
Redding, CA


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Forestry-Focus Public" group.
To post to this group, send email to forestry-f...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to forestry-focus-p...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/forestry-focus-public?hl=en.

Chape...@aol.com

unread,
May 10, 2011, 4:15:48 PM5/10/11
to forestry-f...@googlegroups.com, CJoh...@mpr.org, tker...@mchsi.com, heerm...@yahoo.com, mooseho...@yahoo.com, alf...@aol.com, ptrs...@netscape.net, simm...@comcast.net, pme...@mpr.org, mnsp...@hotmail.com, stsi...@hotmail.com, RRB...@attglobal.net, rrb...@attglobal.net, BBerg...@aol.com, tl...@lahey.com, hsh...@aol.com, wa...@comcast.net, je...@stewart.incline-village.nv.us
Larry,'
 
Look, what I posted is about an article published in Science. That means they have to have actual evidence to back up their claim. It has already made it through the peer review process. I am sure it will incite others to examine the same issue.
 
The article does not say that global warming is driving food prices by itself -- it says that global warming is one of the factors that are leading to increased food prices. I don't find that particularly surprising.
 
For example, there was other new research that came out about two months ago that has shown that any increase in temperatures in the tropics leads to decreased corn production -- every day that the temperatures goes over a certain threshold (about 90 degrees I think) corn pollination shuts down and yields fall. Any increase in temperature increases the number of days over this threshold.
 
Cheers,
 
Roy

Lee Laechelt

unread,
May 10, 2011, 7:29:18 PM5/10/11
to forestry-f...@googlegroups.com

Roy –

 

Perhaps the belief in global warming has driven up food prices as the believers have encouraged governments to mandate conversion of food to ethanol, etc. 20% might be about right.

 

Lee

 

 

--

Larry Miller

unread,
May 10, 2011, 9:38:21 PM5/10/11
to forestry-f...@googlegroups.com, CJoh...@mpr.org, tker...@mchsi.com, heerm...@yahoo.com, mooseho...@yahoo.com, alf...@aol.com, ptrs...@netscape.net, simm...@comcast.net, pme...@mpr.org, mnsp...@hotmail.com, stsi...@hotmail.com, rrb...@attglobal.net, BBerg...@aol.com, tl...@lahey.com, hsh...@aol.com, wa...@comcast.net, je...@stewart.incline-village.nv.us
Roy,

Nonsense.  I posted the myth of "objective" "peer" review, especially as it pertains to climate "science."

Do you want me to post it again?

Here is a link with REAL DATA, not just projections made on inaccurate models, showing how US crop production has fared during the era of so-called "runaway global warming."

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/05/06/stanford-claims-farmers-dodged-impacts-of-global-warming-in-the-usa-but-you-have-to-find-it-first/#more-39350
 
Regards,
 
Larry

"Think what you do when you run in debt; you give another power over your liberty." Benjamin Franklin

"When injustice becomes law, RESISTANCE  becomes duty." Thomas Jefferson

"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them."  Thomas Jefferson
 
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."  Margaret Thatcher

Chape...@aol.com

unread,
May 10, 2011, 10:35:19 PM5/10/11
to forestry-f...@googlegroups.com
 
 
In a message dated 5/10/2011 8:38:23 P.M. Central Daylight Time, tree...@yahoo.com writes:
Roy,

Nonsense.  I posted the myth of "objective" "peer" review, especially as it pertains to climate "science."

Do you want me to post it again?

Here is a link with REAL DATA, not just projections made on inaccurate models, showing how US crop production has fared during the era of so-called "runaway global warming."

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/05/06/stanford-claims-farmers-dodged-impacts-of-global-warming-in-the-usa-but-you-have-to-find-it-first/#more-39350
 
Regards,
 
Larry
 
Larry,
 
Mighty strange what you post as evidence. Here is a quote from your web site --

From Stanford University via Eurekalert

"US farmers dodge the impacts of global warming — at least for now

Global warming is likely already taking a toll on world wheat and corn production, according to a new study led by Stanford University researchers. But the United States, Canada and northern Mexico have largely escaped the trend.

“It appears as if farmers in North America got a pass on the first round of global warming,” said David Lobell, an assistant professor of environmental Earth system science at Stanford University. “That was surprising, given how fast we see weather has been changing in agricultural areas around the world as a whole.”

So it says that global warming is reducing crop yields around the world and the US has been lucky. What's your point, Larry?
 
And look at the crazy graph on your What's Up with That site:
 

Now have a look at US temperature for the same period:

Now that is a graph that would never pass an honest peer review. If that horizontal line is the average, then I'll eat my red hat!
 
You won't find much science on What's Up With That.
 
Please resend you peer review article -- I don't recall it very well.
 
Roy
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages