Public Forum Format
Ted Cady
One proposal for the Public Forums is to have an AGS opposition presentation, and not have presentations by DCR, AGS or TSC members. I think it is assumed that, for lack of a better identifier, the "80-20 group" would like to present its issues. However, again for lack of a better identifier, the "forestry group" also did not get what it wanted and should also be allowed to present. Or, the presenter should be someone in neither camp that presents both groups basic positions. The "neither camp presenter" has the advantage of allowing "third party" concerns, such as mine about timber sale revenue to communities and money for maintenance, to be incorporated into the presentation.
________________________________________
PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com
Heidi Ricci
I wouldn't mind a neutral person presenting the alternative views so
long as what they present is accurate and inclusive - how would that be
ensured?
And I agree that your concerns regarding local community costs and
revenue sharing issues should be included in the list of issues raised
by some stakeholders but not addressed in the report (although I don't
agree that timber income is the only or best way to address those
concerns).
Heidi
Bill and all,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Forest Futures Advisory Group of Stakeholders" group.
To post to this group, send email to
forest-futures-advisor...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
forest-futures-advisory-group-of-stakeholders+unsubscribe@googlegroups.c
om.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/forest-futures-advisory-group-of-stakehol
ders?hl=en.