leverage using the other side's lawyer
Kingsman Funding
In a recent ongoing case the other attorney knowingly brought fraud on the court and now they have brought an ethics complaint with bar association against him. It only takes a few of these and you are out of practice in that state.
I once knew an attorney who gave back his entire fee when an irate client ridiculously became persuaded he had negotiated for her in bad faith with her opponent when the reality is the deal he told her to take was a very amicable one. But she believed otherwise and threatened to make a complaint to the bar association. Even though he would have been entirely vindicated he did not want to have that mark of a complaint on his record. So these things are very important to attorneys and especially so when they have really done some thing or made a serious mistake.
Below is an excerpt from that action with the state bar:
At hearing on Summary Judgment, Mr. xxxxxx promised to have the original note for our inspection. He did not and was ordered by the court to bring the original for the court and our inspection at the earliest date available.
On April 10th 2018, Mr. xxxxx made the supposed “Original” Note available for our inspection and witnessed by a person appointed by the court. Please, refer to our AFFIDAVIT Note Inspection April 10th 2018 Missoula county Courthouse filed April 16th 2018 and AFFIDAVIT Holder in Due Course filed January 25th 2018, herein attached which explains the inspection and that the note presented had a stamped blank endorsement where there had been no endorsement before on copies previously presented as being ‘a true and correct copy’ of the original note to which an allonge was allegedly attached but which copy of the allonge originally came with the deed of trust not the note and was never shown to have ever been attached to any copies of the note.
Thus Mr. xxxx has knowingly presented as evidence in this case two entirely different versions of what he has presented in supposed honor both times as either being the actual note or a ‘true and correct copy of the note’, yet knowing one or the other was a fraudulently represented document intended to deceive the court and the plaintiff for the benefit of his client in this case.
This attorney has some explaining to do and there is no way to explain what he has done because he was either negligent or crooked in what he did and he should be disbarred. If a case goes on long enough there will likely be something like this that comes to light that you can use in your own case. Dr Weatherly
On another very important subject let me add something.
Most people don't understand this, but God was in Christ paying for all our sins on the cross and its over and done and finished and He's not angry with us about anything any more.
The Bible says, He is for us, not against us.
He died in our place to purchase us for Himself and if you'll give in to Him, there's nothing He won't be able to do in your life.
I know, I have been with Him for 40 years.
And when we finally leave this world, we'll live with Him forever,
if we belong to Him.
If you need to think about that or you have someone in mind that does, I'll be glad to talk with them. My number again was 662-489-6554. I just wanted you to know that.
Dr.. Weatherly