Fwd: Pancetta

9 views
Skip to first unread message

Jim Kendall

unread,
Apr 23, 2012, 9:37:10 AM4/23/12
to food



Begin forwarded message:

From: James EKendall <jeke...@me.com>
Date: April 23, 2012 8:30:48 AM CDT
To: James EKendall <jimke...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Fwd: Pancetta



Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: James EKendall <jeke...@me.com>
Date: April 23, 2012 8:26:30 AM CDT
To: food <Foodsa...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Pancetta

As a producer of Pancetta----using trichina free bellies----I was wondering if a 6 log reduction on salmonella would allow me to use bellies that have not been certified as trichina free? Thanks for any help in this matter.     JK

Sent from my iPad

Jim Kendall

unread,
Apr 23, 2012, 9:39:26 AM4/23/12
to Foodsa...@googlegroups.com

Pete Snyder

unread,
Apr 23, 2012, 9:56:27 AM4/23/12
to Jim Kendall, Foodsa...@googlegroups.com
Jim,

Since trichina is easier to inactivate than salmonella, if you have
process validation studies that show a 6 log salmonella reduction, that
would also give adequate trichina reduction.

Pete Snyder

Jim Kendall wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>

>> *From:* James EKendall <jeke...@me.com <mailto:jeke...@me.com>>
>> *Date:* April 23, 2012 8:30:48 AM CDT
>> *To:* James EKendall <jimke...@sbcglobal.net
>> <mailto:jimke...@sbcglobal.net>>
>> *Subject:* *Fwd: Pancetta*


>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>

>>> *From:* James EKendall <jeke...@me.com <mailto:jeke...@me.com>>
>>> *Date:* April 23, 2012 8:26:30 AM CDT
>>> *To:* food <Foodsa...@googlegroups.com
>>> <mailto:Foodsa...@googlegroups.com>>
>>> *Subject:* *Pancetta*


>>>
>>> As a producer of Pancetta----using trichina free bellies----I was
>>> wondering if a 6 log reduction on salmonella would allow me to use
>>> bellies that have not been certified as trichina free? Thanks for
>>> any help in this matter. JK
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad

> --
> You received this message because you subscribed to the "Foodsafe" group.
> To post to this group, send email to Foodsa...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> Foodsafe-lis...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/foodsafe-list
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/foodsafe-list>
> If you're having problems with the list, contact Cindy Roberts at
> foodsa...@gmail.com

--
O Peter Snyder, PhD
Hospitality Institute of Technology and Management
670 Transfer Rd, St Paul Mn 55114
Tel 651-646-7077
email: osn...@hi-tm.com

Carl Custer

unread,
Apr 23, 2012, 11:01:15 AM4/23/12
to Pete Snyder, Jim Kendall, Foodsa...@googlegroups.com
Pete is correct (Ain't he always) but it also depends on what kind of
treatment.
If it's a surface treatment for salmonellae, it won't hit any
inter-muscular Trichinella cysts.
If it's heat, just refer to the table in 9 CFR 318.10(c)(1).
If it's a curing treatment, that's tougher. Folks used to use the
coppa or capocollo treatments for pancetta: 9 CFR318.10(c)(3)(ii &
iii)
The heat treatment in appendix A is nice because it also inactivates
much more than salmonellae and trichinae.

Sent from my T41 ThinkPad in Spring, Texas
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages