foafssl
tyler gillies
--
Everyone Loves Tea
http://www.everyonelovestea.com
Henry Story
On 19 Mar 2010, at 23:06, tyler gillies wrote:
> I am requesting that the foafssl.org callback include foaf:nickname in
> nickname variable
I am just working on foafssl.org now.
It is intended as a stepping stone, to help people get going without needing to set up the most expensive bit of foaf+ssl, namely - until DNSsec perhaps - paying a CA for a server certificate.
There are a huge number of parameters that one could return along with the webid.
We could just re-use the openid attribute exchange spec here, but that won't be something I can do immediately.
Can you not GET the WebId and get all the information from it in RDF? That gives you a lot more than what foafssl.org can offer you.
Henry
>
> --
> Everyone Loves Tea
> http://www.everyonelovestea.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foaf.me" group.
> To post to this group, send email to foa...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to foafme+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foafme?hl=en.
>
tyler gillies
Henry Story
On 19 Mar 2010, at 23:21, tyler gillies wrote:
> Just a request, I don't really need it. It would just let me be lazy ;)
Yes, it's a good idea. I'll add it to the list of things to do, but it will take some time to get to.
Henry
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Henry Story <henry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19 Mar 2010, at 23:06, tyler gillies wrote:
>>
>>> I am requesting that the foafssl.org callback include foaf:nickname in
>>> nickname variable
>>
>> I am just working on foafssl.org now.
>>
>> It is intended as a stepping stone, to help people get going without
>> needing to set up the most expensive bit of foaf+ssl, namely - until DNSsec
>> perhaps - paying a CA for a server certificate.
>>
>> There are a huge number of parameters that one could return along with the
>> webid.
>>
>> We could just re-use the openid attribute exchange spec here, but that
>> won't be something I can do immediately.
>>
>> Can you not GET the WebId and get all the information from it in RDF? That
>> gives you a lot more than what foafssl.org can offer you.
>>
>> Henry
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Everyone Loves Tea
>>> http://www.everyonelovestea.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "foaf.me" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to foa...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> foafme+un...@googlegroups.com<foafme%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/foafme?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "
>> foaf.me" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to foa...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> foafme+un...@googlegroups.com<foafme%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/foafme?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Everyone Loves Tea
> http://www.everyonelovestea.com
>
Natanael L
authentification. :)
http://web.monkeysphere.info/
http://web.monkeysphere.info/why/
tyler gillies
Henry Story
On 24 Mar 2010, at 15:03, Natanael L wrote:
> Monkeyspphere could let you skip that part and go with WOT for
> authentification. :)
> http://web.monkeysphere.info/
> http://web.monkeysphere.info/why/
True. But it's not a good idea to be on two bleeding edges at once. With foaf+ssl we are leading a new project. If we tie our demos to another research project, then there will be a double learning curve for people to go through:
foaf+ssl and monkeysphere
Monkeysphere probably requires setting up a plugin in the browser, and if we ask users to do that there may well be an amalgamation in first time users thinking that foaf+ssl requires the plugin.
So that would just slow the development of foaf+ssl at present, and introduce more complexity and debugging....
Henry
Henry Story
On 24 Mar 2010, at 15:10, tyler gillies wrote:
> will foaf+ssl work if you install a self signed server cert?
It does. The Cheese lover's club has a self signed server cert.
http://esw.w3.org/Foaf%2Bssl/RelyingParties
It is good that we have one demo with a self-signed-server cert but if all of them had that, then the ease of use story of foaf+ssl would be lost.
Henry
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Henry Story <henry...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19 Mar 2010, at 23:06, tyler gillies wrote:
>>
>>> I am requesting that the foafssl.org callback include foaf:nickname in
>>> nickname variable
>>
>> I am just working on foafssl.org now.
>>
>> It is intended as a stepping stone, to help people get going without
>> needing to set up the most expensive bit of foaf+ssl, namely - until DNSsec
>> perhaps - paying a CA for a server certificate.
>>
>> There are a huge number of parameters that one could return along with the
>> webid.
>>
>> We could just re-use the openid attribute exchange spec here, but that
>> won't be something I can do immediately.
>>
>> Can you not GET the WebId and get all the information from it in RDF? That
>> gives you a lot more than what foafssl.org can offer you.
>>
>> Henry
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Everyone Loves Tea
>>> http://www.everyonelovestea.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "foaf.me" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to foa...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> foafme+un...@googlegroups.com<foafme%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/foafme?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "
>> foaf.me" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to foa...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> foafme+un...@googlegroups.com<foafme%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/foafme?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Everyone Loves Tea
> http://www.everyonelovestea.com
>
Melvin Carvalho
will foaf+ssl work if you install a self signed server cert?
Yes, I run my own personal test version on amazon ec2 with a self signed cert (snakeoil)
http://foaf.cc/
Instructions for setting up: https://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/foaf/EC2_Hosting
Akbar Hossain
You might want to look at sparcool.net
Which returns json representations.
We also do something similiar on publickey.info . Although we would
need to extend it out a little bit more. To give access to more
relations.
Thanks
>> foafme+un...@googlegroups.com<foafme%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/foafme?hl=en.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "
>> foaf.me" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to foa...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> foafme+un...@googlegroups.com<foafme%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/foafme?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Everyone Loves Tea
> http://www.everyonelovestea.com
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "foaf.me" group.
> To post to this group, send email to foa...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> foafme+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/foafme?hl=en.
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device