Case 4

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Gabriel Bowers

unread,
Apr 21, 2011, 8:57:48 PM4/21/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com

Did Chacko mention which chapters are prevalent to Case 4 in class?

alex smirnov

unread,
Apr 21, 2011, 10:06:12 PM4/21/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
nope

Robert Binkley

unread,
Apr 23, 2011, 1:21:57 PM4/23/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com

Wow, it's a thick case.  Anyone want to meet today to discuss?

Rob


This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.

shanks...@gmail.com

unread,
Apr 23, 2011, 2:16:26 PM4/23/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
Can't today. How about tomorrow at 11?

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T


From: Robert Binkley <Robert....@xilinx.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:21:57 -0700
Subject: RE: Case 4

Robert Binkley

unread,
Apr 23, 2011, 2:37:39 PM4/23/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com

I'm booked for tomorrow.  Im heading to the library right now and will be on campus until 3.  if anyone wants to meet today let me know.

Rob
408 806 9900





 -----Original Message-----
From:   shanks...@gmail.com [mailto:shanks...@gmail.com]
Sent:   Saturday, April 23, 2011 11:16 AM Pacific Standard Time
To:     fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
Subject:        Re: Case 4

Can't today. How about tomorrow at 11?
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

alex smirnov

unread,
Apr 23, 2011, 4:20:55 PM4/23/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
I might be join on the phone tomorrow.  If you set up a meeting, I'll do my best to try to dial in.

pn

unread,
Apr 24, 2011, 2:14:41 AM4/24/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
Can we have the meeting later in the evening?

I am not clear on Exhibit 4.  The total does not seem to add up to 100% ...maybe I am interpreting it correctly...any one taken a look at this? 

Thanks
Padma

Gabriel Bowers

unread,
Apr 24, 2011, 2:21:17 AM4/24/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
Were there any points made in class this week that we should use in
our write up for this case?

On 4/24/11, pn <pad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can we have the meeting later in the evening?
>
> I am not clear on Exhibit 4. The total does not seem to add up to 100%
> ...maybe I am interpreting it correctly...any one taken a look at this?
>
> Thanks
> Padma
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:20 PM, alex smirnov <alex.s...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I might be join on the phone tomorrow. If you set up a meeting, I'll do
>> my
>> best to try to dial in.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:16 AM, <shanks...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Can't today. How about tomorrow at 11?
>>>
>>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: * Robert Binkley <Robert....@xilinx.com>
>>> *Sender: * fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
>>> *Date: *Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:21:57 -0700
>>> *To: *<fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com>; <
>>> fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com>
>>> *ReplyTo: * fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
>>> *Subject: *RE: Case 4


>>>
>>> Wow, it's a thick case. Anyone want to meet today to discuss?
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: alex smirnov
>>> [mailto:alex.s...@gmail.com<alex.s...@gmail.com>
>>> ]
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 07:06 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>> To: fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
>>> Subject: Re: Case 4
>>>
>>> nope
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Gabriel Bowers <gabrie...@gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Did Chacko mention which chapters are prevalent to Case 4 in class?
>>> >
>>>
>>> This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named
>>> recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be
>>> proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are
>>> not
>>> the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message
>>> or
>>> any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments
>>> immediately.
>>>
>>
>>
>

--
Sent from my mobile device

shashank saggar

unread,
Apr 24, 2011, 7:11:33 AM4/24/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com

Don't think he did. I will be on my way back from a business trip back in the evening and won't be able to make it anytime after 11:30 - 12:30.

In case you guys want to meet after class tomorrow, that works for me.

Shashank

On Apr 24, 2011 2:21 AM, "Gabriel Bowers" <gabrie...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dinesh Kantaria

unread,
Apr 24, 2011, 11:11:38 AM4/24/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
After class tomorrow would be good for me too.

Dinesh

Shashank Saggar

unread,
Apr 24, 2011, 11:45:12 AM4/24/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
I haven't had a chance to finish my analysis yet. If you guys want, I can organize the web meeting for us to meet at 11:30. If that time does not work for everyone, sounds like tomorrow after class works best.

Thoughts?

Shashank

alex smirnov

unread,
Apr 24, 2011, 12:10:49 PM4/24/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
i guess tomorrow after class it is...

reading this case is like pulling teeth  =(

Dinesh Kantaria

unread,
Apr 24, 2011, 1:07:48 PM4/24/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
Is anyone have any problem of login to Harvard Publishing to access the case? I am not able to login since 8:30AM.

Dinesh

alex smirnov

unread,
Apr 24, 2011, 1:11:19 PM4/24/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dinesh,

I bought them all at once.  Here's the case attached.
The Investment Fund for Foundations (TIFF) in 2009.pdf

Dinesh Kantaria

unread,
Apr 24, 2011, 1:24:52 PM4/24/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
Alex,

That was I did and I was reading last night but for some reason today it doesn't let me in.

Anyway I really appreciated your help on this.

Thank you very much.

Dinesh

<The Investment Fund for Foundations (TIFF) in 2009.pdf>

Dinesh Kantaria

unread,
Apr 24, 2011, 6:30:03 PM4/24/11
to fnc_455_s...@googlegroups.com
Padma,

I think you are right the total is more than 100%.

If you remember, professor said "Futures" doesn't count for the balance sheet. In this case Futures is 12.8% allocated, about $7.7Ms, so I think they are not counting this because there is no real money allocated for this transactions.

Dinesh
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages