http://gitorious.org/xdg-specs/xdg-specs/blobs/master/specifications/FMPSpecs/specification.txt
From my perspective putting in more RFC-style language will make this a
1.0 spec -- now's a great time to chime in if there's something about
the spec you don't like (that isn't something that can be fixed in a new
version, such as new tag types).
--Jeff
What about them? Can you provide some details as to what you think is
missing, with respect to cue files, and that belong in file metadata?
Thanks,
Jeff
OK, I see what you're saying. But as I have no experience with them,
please propose a workable solution.
> According to CUE sheet syntax
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cue_sheet_(computing)#Cue_sheet_syntax),
> this can be realised using REM command.
I don't see, from looking at that page, what the REM command has to do
with anything. That's information in a cue file, not in file metadata.
I assume you mean, will ignore REM strings with FMPS info in them.
Anyways, while this sounds nice, I would suggest making this a task for
v1.1 or so of the spec. There's also license information we'd like to
put in there. But right now I think new functionality should be
restricted in favor of releasing v1.0 soon.
P.S. I like the MS batch-file REM comment name...
--Jeff