some things to check related to arteries

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Alan Ruttenberg

unread,
Jul 23, 2010, 12:07:39 AM7/23/10
to fma-owl-2009
This one is wrong:

Wall of artery regional part of Interlobular artery of liver

All of these have 'regional part of' 'artery' assertions (and
sometimes others) that are, strictly speaking, correct, but don't work
in the inverse direction.

Wall of brachiocephalic artery
Wall of common carotid artery
Wall of coronary artery
Wall of left common carotid artery
Wall of left coronary artery
Wall of left pulmonary artery
Wall of left subclavian artery
Wall of pulmonary artery
Wall of pulmonary trunk
Wall of right common carotid artery
Wall of right coronary artery
Wall of right middle cerebral artery
Wall of right pulmonary artery
Wall of right subclavian artery
Wall of subclavian artery

-Alan

mej...@comcast.net

unread,
Jul 23, 2010, 1:50:40 PM7/23/10
to fma-ow...@googlegroups.com




----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanrut...@gmail.com>
To: "fma-owl-2009" <fma-ow...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 9:07:39 PM
Subject: some things to check related to arteries

This one is wrong:

Wall of artery regional part of Interlobular artery of liver


OM: I have corrected this. Thanks.



All of these have 'regional part of' 'artery' assertions (and
sometimes others) that are, strictly speaking, correct, but don't work
in the inverse direction.

OM:
The inverse works depending on which subproperty of part relation is used:

Wall of brachiocephalic artery is a constitutional_part-of brachiocephalic artery
Inverse- brachiocephalic artery has_constitutional_part Wall of brachiocephalic artery

Wall of brachiocephalic artery is a regional_part-of wall of systemic arterial tree
Inverse- Wall of systemic arterial tree has_regional_part Wall of brachiocephalic artery

Alan Ruttenberg

unread,
Jul 24, 2010, 8:11:12 PM7/24/10
to fma-ow...@googlegroups.com
> All of these have 'regional part of' 'artery' assertions (and
> sometimes others) that are, strictly speaking, correct, but don't work
> in the inverse direction.

My bad on this. These were the result of an overenthusiastic heuristic
assignment of regional parts based on name by some code of mine. Next
iteration of my code will more carefully record where assertions come
from.

-Alan

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages