Another RIA Test Automation Tool

[dreamhead]

Hi, all!

RIATest is another RIA test automation tool.whose concept is similar
to Fluorida. I don't like its testing script syntax, but I think we
may get some ideas from it.

http://riatest.com/

News From InfoQ:
English: http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/03/riatest-beta-released
Chinse: http://www.infoq.com/cn/news/2008/03/riatest-beta-released

Ye Zheng
--
Everything is simple!

[咖啡屋的鼠标]

I think its concept similar to FunFx and its script also looks like FunFx.It also depends on automation framework.

ps: My English is poor. So I'm afraid that I can't express my opinions completly.Shall we need to talk in English? Is there a rule or something?

2008/3/12, dreamhead <dreamh...@gmail.com>:

[dreamhead]

Thank you for your conclusion.
It is a limitation to depends on automation frame. As we have known,
FunFX is not welcome and very slow.

If we regard Fluorida as REAL open source project, not just a Chinse
open source project, English is a better choice. Don't worry about
your English, more practice will help you.

Ye Zheng

2008/3/12, 咖啡屋的鼠标 <tj1...@gmail.com>:

--
Everything is simple!

[Gigix]

Quote RIATest:
"It lets you record your interaction with application or write test
scripts manually and then plays back the test script. "

Although it's not in my interest to record and playback test scripts,
a cast number of popular functional testing tools (such as Selenium
and Abbot) provide that functionality. Shall we consider it seriously,
or just stay away from it?

On Mar 12, 11:30 pm, dreamhead <dreamhead...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your conclusion.
> It is a limitation to depends on automation frame. As we have known,
> FunFX is not welcome and very slow.
>
> If we regard Fluorida as REAL open source project, not just a Chinse
> open source project, English is a better choice. Don't worry about
> your English, more practice will help you.
>
> Ye Zheng
>

> 2008/3/12, 咖啡屋的鼠标 <tj19...@gmail.com>:

>
>
>
> > I think its concept similar to FunFx and its script also looks like FunFx.It
> > also depends on automation framework.
>
> > ps: My English is poor. So I'm afraid that I can't express my opinions
> > completly.Shall we need to talk in English? Is there a rule or something?
>

> > 2008/3/12, dreamhead <dreamhead...@gmail.com>:

[咖啡屋的鼠标]

Well, I see.
I also think FunFx is not a good choice for Flex Developer.

在08-3-12，dreamhead <dreamh...@gmail.com> 写道：

--
鼠标
=======
我的博客：http://www.blogjava.net/tj19832
我的twitter：http://twitter.com/tj19832

[dreamhead]

I don't think it should have very high priority to record and playback
test scripts. Currently, We'd better focus on main functionality. But
it's good point which we can record it in our future TODO list.

Ye Zheng

在 08-3-12，Gigix<gigi...@gmail.com> 写道：

--
Everything is simple!

[咖啡屋的鼠标]

I think we can consider it in the future. It is easy to record and translate the actions to our script.

在08-3-12，咖啡屋的鼠标 <tj1...@gmail.com> 写道：