Fwd: MEC E 460 - Drawings Confusion

[Abhishek Soni]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mike Lipsett <mlip...@ualberta.ca>
Date: Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: MEC E 460 - Drawings Confusion
To: Abhishek Soni <ams...@ualberta.ca>


Hello
That is described in the lecture notes from Friday which will be posted this evening. An unmodified supplied part only needs to be shown in outline, as necessary to show assembly, confirm that it fits, etc.

Regards,
MGL

On 2013-03-24, at 19:08, Abhishek Soni <ams...@ualberta.ca> wrote:

> Hello Dr. Lipsett,
>
> Sorry for bombarding your email today, just need to clarify one last time regarding the drawings. Most of the components in our subsystems are suggested to be bought from vendors so do we need to include their overall drawings in our drawing package? For example, we have suggested to buy tapered roller bearing and deep grooved ball bearings from NSK bearings. So, should we include the bearing's drawing with its critical dimensions? (Overall thickness, inner tolerances and the height)
>
> Thanks,
> Abhishek